Literature DB >> 21830189

Colonoscopy and fecal occult blood test use in Germany: results from a large insurance-based cohort.

C Stock1, P Ihle, I Schubert, H Brenner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Colonoscopy and guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests (FOBT) are recommended and offered for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in Germany. We aimed to explore their utilization in a large insurance-based cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Claims data from between 2000 and 2008 were collected for 170493 individuals who were insured by a large health insurance plan in the federal state of Hesse, Germany. The percentages of individuals who had recently utilized CRC screening-related procedures were calculated. Additionally, multiple test use and identification of CRC screening providers were ascertained.
RESULTS: Following the inception of the current CRC screening program in 2002, colonoscopy utilization rates varied only slightly and FOBT use decreased in individuals aged ≥50 years. At the end of 2008, the age-standardized percentages of individuals who had undergone colonoscopy within ≤10 years were 23% for men and 26% for women. The proportions of individuals who had used FOBT within ≤1 year were 14% for men and 22% for women. Patient education had been utilized by 38% of eligible persons and was increasingly followed by screening colonoscopy. For women, practices that specialized in gynecology were the main providers of FOBT (93%) and patient education (61%).
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides new insights into the inter-related utilization of colonoscopy, FOBT, and patient education in Germany, and may be particularly informative for the design of strategies to increase CRC screening uptake. It indicates that sex differences in CRC screening test use could result to a large extent from general visits to different types of specialist physicians involved in the CRC screening process. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21830189     DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1256504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  16 in total

1.  Variation in colorectal cancer testing between primary care physicians: a cross-sectional study in Switzerland.

Authors:  Alexander Leonhard Braun; Emanuele Prati; Yonas Martin; Charles Dvořák; Kali Tal; Nikola Biller-Andorno; Jean-Luc Bulliard; Jacques Cornuz; Kevin Selby; Reto Auer
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Change in colorectal cancer (CRC) testing rates associated with the introduction of the first organized screening program in canton Uri, Switzerland: Evidence from insurance claims data analyses from 2010 to 2018.

Authors:  Sarah Bissig; Lamprini Syrogiannouli; Rémi Schneider; Kali Tal; Kevin Selby; Cinzia Del Giovane; Jean-Luc Bulliard; Oliver Senn; Cyril Ducros; Christian P R Schmid; Urs Marbet; Reto Auer
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-06-10

3.  Improvement in colorectal cancer outcomes over time is limited to patients with left-sided disease.

Authors:  Holger Rumpold; M Hackl; A Petzer; D Wolf
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 4.322

Review 4.  Colorectal cancer screening--optimizing current strategies and new directions.

Authors:  Ernst J Kuipers; Thomas Rösch; Michael Bretthauer
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Screening colonoscopy and risk for incident late-stage colorectal cancer diagnosis in average-risk adults: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Chyke A Doubeni; Sheila Weinmann; Kenneth Adams; Aruna Kamineni; Diana S M Buist; Arlene S Ash; Carolyn M Rutter; V Paul Doria-Rose; Douglas A Corley; Robert T Greenlee; Jessica Chubak; Andrew Williams; Aimee R Kroll-Desrosiers; Eric Johnson; Joseph Webster; Kathryn Richert-Boe; Theodore R Levin; Robert H Fletcher; Noel S Weiss
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 6.  Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies.

Authors:  Hermann Brenner; Christian Stock; Michael Hoffmeister
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-04-09

7.  Neighborhood socioeconomic status and use of colonoscopy in an insured population--a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Chyke A Doubeni; Guruprasad D Jambaulikar; Hassan Fouayzi; Scott B Robinson; Margaret J Gunter; Terry S Field; Douglas W Roblin; Robert H Fletcher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Inter-physician variation in follow-up colonoscopies after screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Christian Stock; Michael Hoffmeister; Berndt Birkner; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Sex differences in colorectal cancer survival: population-based analysis of 164,996 colorectal cancer patients in Germany.

Authors:  Ondrej Majek; Adam Gondos; Lina Jansen; Katharina Emrich; Bernd Holleczek; Alexander Katalinic; Alice Nennecke; Andrea Eberle; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Adherence to physician recommendations for surveillance in opportunistic colorectal cancer screening: the necessity of organized surveillance.

Authors:  Christian Stock; Bernd Holleczek; Michael Hoffmeister; Thomas Stolz; Christa Stegmaier; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.