Literature DB >> 20430429

Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Wendy S Atkin1, Rob Edwards, Ines Kralj-Hans, Kate Wooldrage, Andrew R Hart, John M A Northover, D Max Parkin, Jane Wardle, Stephen W Duffy, Jack Cuzick.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide and has a high mortality rate. We tested the hypothesis that only one flexible sigmoidoscopy screening between 55 and 64 years of age can substantially reduce colorectal cancer incidence and mortality.
METHODS: This randomised controlled trial was undertaken in 14 UK centres. 170 432 eligible men and women, who had indicated on a previous questionnaire that they would accept an invitation for screening, were randomly allocated to the intervention group (offered flexible sigmoidoscopy screening) or the control group (not contacted). Randomisation by sequential number generation was done centrally in blocks of 12, with stratification by trial centre, general practice, and household type. The primary outcomes were the incidence of colorectal cancer, including prevalent cases detected at screening, and mortality from colorectal cancer. Analyses were intention to treat and per protocol. The trial is registered, number ISRCTN28352761.
FINDINGS: 113 195 people were assigned to the control group and 57 237 to the intervention group, of whom 112 939 and 57 099, respectively, were included in the final analyses. 40 674 (71%) people underwent flexible sigmoidoscopy. During screening and median follow-up of 11.2 years (IQR 10.7-11.9), 2524 participants were diagnosed with colorectal cancer (1818 in control group vs 706 in intervention group) and 20 543 died (13 768 vs 6775; 727 certified from colorectal cancer [538 vs 189]). In intention-to-treat analyses, colorectal cancer incidence in the intervention group was reduced by 23% (hazard ratio 0.77, 95% CI 0.70-0.84) and mortality by 31% (0.69, 0.59-0.82). In per-protocol analyses, adjusting for self-selection bias in the intervention group, incidence of colorectal cancer in people attending screening was reduced by 33% (0.67, 0.60-0.76) and mortality by 43% (0.57, 0.45-0.72). Incidence of distal colorectal cancer (rectum and sigmoid colon) was reduced by 50% (0.50, 0.42-0.59; secondary outcome). The numbers needed to be screened to prevent one colorectal cancer diagnosis or death, by the end of the study period, were 191 (95% CI 145-277) and 489 (343-852), respectively.
INTERPRETATION: Flexible sigmoidoscopy is a safe and practical test and, when offered only once between ages 55 and 64 years, confers a substantial and longlasting benefit. FUNDING: Medical Research Council, National Health Service R&D, Cancer Research UK, KeyMed. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20430429     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60551-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  530 in total

Review 1.  Fecal immunochemical tests compared with guaiac fecal occult blood tests for population-based colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Linda Rabeneck; R Bryan Rumble; Frank Thompson; Michael Mills; Curtis Oleschuk; Alexandra Whibley; Hans Messersmith; Nancy Lewis
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.522

2.  Modestly increased use of colonoscopy when copayments are waived.

Authors:  Shabnam Khatami; Lei Xuan; Rolando Roman; Song Zhang; Charles McConnel; Ethan A Halm; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 11.382

3.  Magnetic air capsule robotic system: proof of concept of a novel approach for painless colonoscopy.

Authors:  P Valdastri; G Ciuti; A Verbeni; A Menciassi; P Dario; A Arezzo; M Morino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Screening for colorectal cancer: established and emerging modalities.

Authors:  Nikhil Pawa; Tan Arulampalam; John D Norton
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 46.802

5.  Quantifying the potential benefit of sigmoidoscopic rescreening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Noel S Weiss; Polly A Newcomb
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Colonoscopy: diagnostic yield of flexible sigmoidoscopy and CTC.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 46.802

7.  Association between colonoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality in a US cohort according to site of cancer and colonoscopist specialty.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Joan L Warren; Michael J Barrett; Therese A Stukel; V Paul Doria-Rose
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Physician characteristics associated with higher adenoma detection rate.

Authors:  Ateev Mehrotra; Michele Morris; Rebecca A Gourevitch; David S Carrell; Daniel A Leffler; Sherri Rose; Julia B Greer; Seth D Crockett; Andrew Baer; Robert E Schoen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 9.  Colorectal cancer screening--optimizing current strategies and new directions.

Authors:  Ernst J Kuipers; Thomas Rösch; Michael Bretthauer
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 66.675

10.  Public reporting of colonoscopy quality is associated with an increase in endoscopist adenoma detection rate.

Authors:  Heitham Abdul-Baki; Robert E Schoen; Katie Dean; Sherri Rose; Daniel A Leffler; Eliathamby Kuganeswaran; Michele Morris; David Carrell; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 9.427

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.