Literature DB >> 21852264

Once-only sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: follow-up findings of the Italian Randomized Controlled Trial--SCORE.

Nereo Segnan1, Paola Armaroli, Luigina Bonelli, Mauro Risio, Stefania Sciallero, Marco Zappa, Bruno Andreoni, Arrigo Arrigoni, Luigi Bisanti, Claudia Casella, Cristiano Crosta, Fabio Falcini, Franco Ferrero, Adriano Giacomin, Orietta Giuliani, Alessandra Santarelli, Carmen Beatriz Visioli, Roberto Zanetti, Wendy S Atkin, Carlo Senore.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A single flexible sigmoidoscopy at around the age of 60 years has been proposed as an effective strategy for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening.
METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on CRC incidence and mortality. A questionnaire to assess the eligibility and interest in screening was mailed to 236,568 men and women, aged 55-64 years, who were randomly selected from six trial centers in Italy. Of the 56,532 respondents, interested and eligible subjects were randomly assigned to the intervention group (invitation for flexible sigmoidoscopy; n = 17,148) or the control group (no further contact; n = 17,144), between June 14, 1995, and May 10, 1999. Flexible sigmoidoscopy was performed on 9911 subjects. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were performed to compare the CRC incidence and mortality rates in the intervention and control groups. Per-protocol analysis was adjusted for noncompliance.
RESULTS: A total of 34,272 subjects (17,136 in each group) were included in the follow-up analysis. The median follow-up period was 10.5 years for incidence and 11.4 years for mortality; 251 subjects were diagnosed with CRC in the intervention group and 306 in the control group. Overall incidence rates in the intervention and control groups were 144.11 and 176.43, respectively, per 100,000 person-years. CRC-related death was noted in 65 subjects in the intervention group and 83 subjects in the control group. Mortality rates in the intervention and control groups were 34.66 and 44.45, respectively, per 100,000 person-years. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the rate of CRC incidence was statistically significantly reduced in the intervention group by 18% (rate ratio [RR] = 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.69 to 0.96), and the mortality rate was non-statistically significantly reduced by 22% (RR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.56 to 1.08) compared with the control group. In the per-protocol analysis, both CRC incidence and mortality rates were statistically significantly reduced among the screened subjects; CRC incidence was reduced by 31% (RR = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.56 to 0.86) and mortality was reduced by 38% (RR = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.40 to 0.96) compared with the control group.
CONCLUSION: A single flexible sigmoidoscopy screening between ages 55 and 64 years was associated with a substantial reduction of CRC incidence and mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21852264     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djr284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  191 in total

Review 1.  Screening for colorectal cancer: established and emerging modalities.

Authors:  Nikhil Pawa; Tan Arulampalam; John D Norton
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  Quantifying the potential benefit of sigmoidoscopic rescreening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Noel S Weiss; Polly A Newcomb
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Association between colonoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality in a US cohort according to site of cancer and colonoscopist specialty.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Joan L Warren; Michael J Barrett; Therese A Stukel; V Paul Doria-Rose
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Principles of Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Paul F Pinsky
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: long-term follow-up of the randomised US PLCO cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Eric A Miller; Paul F Pinsky; Robert E Schoen; Philip C Prorok; Timothy R Church
Journal:  Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-11-29

6.  Physician characteristics associated with higher adenoma detection rate.

Authors:  Ateev Mehrotra; Michele Morris; Rebecca A Gourevitch; David S Carrell; Daniel A Leffler; Sherri Rose; Julia B Greer; Seth D Crockett; Andrew Baer; Robert E Schoen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 7.  Colorectal cancer screening--optimizing current strategies and new directions.

Authors:  Ernst J Kuipers; Thomas Rösch; Michael Bretthauer
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  Public reporting of colonoscopy quality is associated with an increase in endoscopist adenoma detection rate.

Authors:  Heitham Abdul-Baki; Robert E Schoen; Katie Dean; Sherri Rose; Daniel A Leffler; Eliathamby Kuganeswaran; Michele Morris; David Carrell; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Can we achieve an 80% screening rate for colorectal cancer by 2018 in the United States?

Authors:  Electra D Paskett; Fadlo R Khuri
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Cost-effectiveness of patient navigation to increase adherence with screening colonoscopy among minority individuals.

Authors:  Uri Ladabaum; Ajitha Mannalithara; Lina Jandorf; Steven H Itzkowitz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.