Literature DB >> 19622721

Socioeconomic and racial patterns of colorectal cancer screening among Medicare enrollees in 2000 to 2005.

Chyke A Doubeni1, Adeyinka O Laiyemo, George Reed, Terry S Field, Robert H Fletcher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lower rates of screening among minorities and low-income populations contribute to colorectal cancer health disparities. Therefore, we examined patterns of colorectal cancer screening and associations with race-ethnicity, education, and income over time.
METHODS: Repeated cross-sectional data from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey of noninstitutionalized colorectal cancer-free Medicare enrollees ages 65 to 80 years interviewed in 2000 (n = 8,355), 2003 (n = 7,922), and 2005 (n = 7,646). We examined rates of colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy use within 5 years (recent endoscopy), colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy use >5 years previously, or fecal occult blood test (FOBT) within 2 years.
RESULTS: Among those included in the analyses, there was a steady increase in recent endoscopy rates and decrease in FOBT use over the 6-year period among all racial, educational, and income groups. During each of the survey years, those less educated or in lower-income groups were less likely to undergo colorectal cancer screening in a dose-response fashion. In multinomial regression analyses that adjusted for factors including health insurance, there were no significant differences in recent endoscopy or FOBT rates between Blacks or Hispanics and Whites, but differences by education and income remained. Compared with those in higher-income group, lower-income enrollees had lower rates of screening, and differences by income were larger for enrollees residing in metropolitan areas.
CONCLUSION: Among Medicare beneficiaries, there are persistent colorectal cancer screening disparities due to a complex combination of socioeconomic disadvantages from lower education and income, place of residence, and inadequate insurance. However, insurance alone does not eliminate socioeconomic differences in colorectal cancer screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19622721      PMCID: PMC3018698          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  32 in total

1.  Cost effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in the elderly.

Authors:  J L Wagner; R C Herdman; S Wadhwa
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-11-15       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Patient race/ethnicity and quality of patient-physician communication during medical visits.

Authors:  Rachel L Johnson; Debra Roter; Neil R Powe; Lisa A Cooper
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Health disparities based on socioeconomic inequities: implications for urban health care.

Authors:  Kevin Fiscella; David R Williams
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Is there endoscopic capacity to provide colorectal cancer screening to the unscreened population in the United States?

Authors:  Laura C Seeff; Diane L Manninen; Fred B Dong; Sajal K Chattopadhyay; Marion R Nadel; Florence K L Tangka; Noelle-Angelique M Molinari
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Colorectal cancer screening, 1997-1999: role of income, insurance and policy.

Authors:  E Kathleen Adams; Kenneth E Thorpe; Edmund R Becker; Peter J Joski; Jennifer Flome
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Patterns and predictors of colorectal cancer test use in the adult U.S. population.

Authors:  Laura C Seeff; Marion R Nadel; Carrie N Klabunde; Trevor Thompson; Jean A Shapiro; Sally W Vernon; Ralph J Coates
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study.

Authors:  J S Mandel; J H Bond; T R Church; D C Snover; G M Bradley; L M Schuman; F Ederer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J V Selby; G D Friedman; C P Quesenberry; N S Weiss
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-03-05       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

Authors:  S J Winawer; A G Zauber; M N Ho; M J O'Brien; L S Gottlieb; S S Sternberg; J D Waye; M Schapiro; J H Bond; J F Panish
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  A profile of the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey.

Authors:  G S Adler
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1994
View more
  73 in total

1.  Despite 'welcome to Medicare' benefit, one in eight enrollees delay first use of part B services for at least two years.

Authors:  Frank A Sloan; Kofi F Acquah; Paul P Lee; Devdutta G Sangvai
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Primary care, economic barriers to health care, and use of colorectal cancer screening tests among Medicare enrollees over time.

Authors:  Chyke A Doubeni; Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Angela C Young; Carrie N Klabunde; George Reed; Terry S Field; Robert H Fletcher
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Impact of Medicare Age Eligibility on Health Spending among U.S. and Foreign-Born Adults.

Authors:  Wassim Tarraf; Gail A Jensen; Hector M González
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Challenges and possible solutions to colorectal cancer screening for the underserved.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; Daniel A Sussman; Chyke A Doubeni; Daniel S Anderson; Lukejohn Day; Amar R Deshpande; B Joseph Elmunzer; Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Jeanette Mendez; Ma Somsouk; James Allison; Taft Bhuket; Zhuo Geng; Beverly B Green; Steven H Itzkowitz; Maria Elena Martinez
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Effect of a patient navigator program on the volume and quality of colonoscopy.

Authors:  Benjamin Lebwohl; Alfred I Neugut; Eliezer Stavsky; Sonia Villegas; Corinne Meli; Orlando Rodriguez; Carmen Franco; Marian S Krauskopf; Richard Rosenberg
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.062

6.  Rates and predictors of colorectal cancer screening by race among motivated men participating in a Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment Program.

Authors:  Michael J Hall; Karen Ruth; Veda N Giri
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Race and colorectal cancer disparities: health-care utilization vs different cancer susceptibilities.

Authors:  Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Chyke Doubeni; Paul F Pinsky; V Paul Doria-Rose; Robert Bresalier; Lois E Lamerato; E David Crawford; Paul Kvale; Mona Fouad; Thomas Hickey; Thomas Riley; Joel Weissfeld; Robert E Schoen; Pamela M Marcus; Philip C Prorok; Christine D Berg
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Concerns and challenges in flexible sigmoidoscopy screening.

Authors:  Akeem O Adebogun; Christine D Berg; Adeyinka O Laiyemo
Journal:  Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2012-08

9.  Secular trends in colon and rectal cancer relative survival.

Authors:  Carolyn M Rutter; Eric A Johnson; Eric J Feuer; Amy B Knudsen; Karen M Kuntz; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening Across Healthcare Systems.

Authors:  Andrea N Burnett-Hartman; Shivan J Mehta; Yingye Zheng; Nirupa R Ghai; Dale F McLerran; Jessica Chubak; Virginia P Quinn; Celette Sugg Skinner; Douglas A Corley; John M Inadomi; Chyke A Doubeni
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 5.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.