Literature DB >> 23456042

[Arterial closure devices. What device for which clinical situation?].

M Treitl1, K M Eberhardt, D Maxien, B Behrends, M F Reiser.   

Abstract

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE: Access site complications after endovascular catheterization sometimes require open surgery and negatively impair safety, patient comfort and reimbursement. Increasing numbers of procedures and patients with multiple anticoagulants as well as cost pressure explain the demand for an immediate and stable access site closure. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL
METHODS: Manual compression followed by compression bandage and bed rest for 4-24 h is still the gold standard but is unable to prevent access site complications in all cases. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Arterial vascular closure devices allow immediate and stable closure of the puncture channel either by suture or by implantation of occluding foreign bodies or gluing fluids. PERFORMANCE: The safety has been proven in several clinical trials. The main advantage lies in closing large lumen access sites without surgery and in patients treated with multiple anticoagulants as well as in outpatient procedures. ACHIEVEMENTS: They have become a valuable supplement to the interventional arsenal. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: The physician, however, has to decide between different systems and mechanisms with respect to patient constitution, selected access vessel and level of calcification and diameter. Furthermore, all systems require a defined training prior the first use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23456042     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-012-2423-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  33 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of percutaneous vascular closure devices after diagnostic catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Paul T Vaitkus
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.022

2.  Unselected percutaneous access with large vessel closure for endovascular aortic surgery: experience and predictors of technical success.

Authors:  M J Metcalfe; J R W Brownrigg; S A Black; T Loosemore; I M Loftus; M M Thompson
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 7.069

Review 3.  An overview of vascular closure devices: what every radiologist should know.

Authors:  L Q Hon; A Ganeshan; S M Thomas; D Warakaulle; J Jagdish; R Uberoi
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  Incidence and results of arterial complications among 16,350 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  S C Babu; G O Piccorelli; P M Shah; J H Stein; R H Clauss
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Suitability of Exoseal vascular closure device for antegrade femoral artery puncture site closure.

Authors:  Christopher Schmelter; Andrea Liebl; Nektarios Poullos; Volker Ruppert; Dierk Vorwerk
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Vascular complications after percutaneous coronary intervention following hemostasis with the Mynx vascular closure device versus the AngioSeal vascular closure device.

Authors:  Shah Azmoon; Anthony L Pucillo; Wilbert S Aronow; Ramin Ebrahimi; Joseph Vozzolo; Archana Rajdev; Kumar Kalapatapu; Jae H Ro; Craig Hjemdahl-Monsen
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.022

7.  Experimental experiences with the collagen sponge as hemostaticum and tampon.

Authors:  M Chvapil; R Holusa
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1968-06

8.  Arteriotomy closure device safety after percutaneous coronary intervention in the direct thrombin inhibitor era: a comparative study.

Authors:  Gus Theodos; Chad Raymond; Matthew C Becker; Julie Thornton; Stephen G Ellis; Deepak L Bhatt; Russell E Raymond
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Cardiva Catalyst II vascular access management device in percutaneous diagnostic and interventional procedures with same-day discharge (Catalyst II trial).

Authors:  R Stefan Kiesz; Barbara K Wiernek; Szymon L Wiernek; Charlotte Merritt; Tomas Ybarra; Adam Iwanski; Piotr P Buszman; Radoslaw Szymanski; Jack L Martin; Pawel E Buszman
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.487

10.  Effect of a closure device on complication rates in high-local-risk patients: results of a randomized multicenter trial.

Authors:  Bernard Chevalier; Bernard Lancelin; Rene Koning; Michel Henry; Antoine Gommeaux; Remy Pilliere; Meyer Elbaz; Thierry Lefevre; Kamel Boughalem; Jean Marco; Patrick Dupouy
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  1 in total

1.  Safety and efficiency of femoral artery access closure with a novel biodegradable closure device: a prospective single-centre pilot study.

Authors:  Karla M Treitl; Alma Ali; Marcus Treitl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 5.315

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.