Literature DB >> 12594688

Effect of a closure device on complication rates in high-local-risk patients: results of a randomized multicenter trial.

Bernard Chevalier1, Bernard Lancelin, Rene Koning, Michel Henry, Antoine Gommeaux, Remy Pilliere, Meyer Elbaz, Thierry Lefevre, Kamel Boughalem, Jean Marco, Patrick Dupouy.   

Abstract

Clinical trials have shown that coronary stenting is associated with a high level of complications at the access site. Arterial sealing devices have proven their efficacy in obtaining immediate hemostasis after sheath removal, in allowing early ambulation, and in improving patient comfort. However, there is no report showing a reduction of local complications related to their use. The purpose of this multicenter study was to compare randomly the efficacy of Angio-Seal versus compression methods of hemostasis in reducing the rate of access site complications after coronary angioplasty in 612 selected patients with higher risk of local events satisfying at least one of the following high-risk criteria: age > 70, previous puncture at the same site, history of hypertension, treatment with ticlopidine at least 2 days before the procedure, use of abciximab, 8 Fr access, prolonged heparin treatment after the angioplasty, and use of lytics if fibrinogen > 1 g/l. Group A (n = 306) had immediate sheath removal, Angio-Seal implantation, and cessation of bed rest 4 hr after the intervention. Group B (n = 306) had sheath removal according to local practice and cessation of bed rest 6-18 hr after the hemostasis procedure, also according to local practice. Clinical follow-up was done at 1 hr, 4 hr, 24 hr, discharge, and 7 days and a systematic color flow duplex sonography was performed to confirm diagnosis of access site complication. In group A, device deployment and immediate hemostasis were obtained in, respectively, 96.8% and 87% of patients. Time to hemostasis was shorter in group A: 5 vs. 52 min (P < 0.001). Cessation of bed rest was dramatically reduced in group A (438 +/- 450 min) vs. group B (952 +/- 308 min; P < 0.001). The cumulative rate of complications, using a composite primary endpoint, at 7 days was significantly different between the two groups: 5.9% of group A patients and 18% of group B patients (P < 0.001). This difference was mainly due to the dramatic reduction of prolonged bleeding in group A patients. Angio-Seal device use in high-local-risk patients allows immediate sheath removal and hemostasis with a reduction of local event rate despite a higher level of anticoagulation, compared to regular compression techniques, directly related to a dramatic decrease of prolonged bleeding. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12594688     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.10431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  17 in total

1.  Safety and efficiency of femoral artery access closure with a novel biodegradable closure device: a prospective single-centre pilot study.

Authors:  Karla M Treitl; Alma Ali; Marcus Treitl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Bleeding avoidance strategies. Consensus and controversy.

Authors:  Harold L Dauerman; Sunil V Rao; Frederic S Resnic; Robert J Applegate
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Comparison of Exo-Seal(®) and Angio-Seal (®) for arterial puncture site closure: A randomized, multicenter, single-blind trial.

Authors:  Johannes Ketterle; Harald Rittger; Inga Helmig; Lutz Klinghammer; Stefan Zimmermann; Wolfgang Hohenforst-Schmidt; Johannes Brachmann; Holger Nef; Stephan Achenbach; Christian Schlundt
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 1.443

4.  A cost-minimization analysis of the angio-seal vascular closure device following percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Frederic S Resnic; Nipun Arora; Michael Matheny; Matthew R Reynolds
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  An evaluation of immediate sheath removal and use of the Angio-Seal vascular closure device in neuroradiological interventions.

Authors:  L Pierot; D Herbreteau; S Bracard; J Berge; C Cognard
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  The frequency of vascular complications associated with the use of vascular closure devices varies by indication for cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  Emilia Stegemann; Rainer Hoffmann; Steven Marso; Berthold Stegemann; Nikolaus Marx; Thomas Lauer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 5.460

7.  Incidence of delayed angiographic femoral artery complications using the EXOSEAL vascular closure device.

Authors:  Ramesh Grandhi; Xiaoran Zhang; David Panczykowski; Phillip Choi; Christopher T Hunnicutt; Ashutosh P Jadhav; Andrew F Ducruet; Tudor Jovin; Brian Jankowitz
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 1.610

8.  [Arterial closure devices. What device for which clinical situation?].

Authors:  M Treitl; K M Eberhardt; D Maxien; B Behrends; M F Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 0.635

9.  Revascularization for patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Chan-Hee Lee; Ung Kim
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 3.243

10.  Vascular closure device failure in contemporary practice.

Authors:  Venkatesan D Vidi; Michael E Matheny; Usha S Govindarajulu; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Susan L Robbins; Vikram V Agarwal; Sripal Bangalore; Frederic S Resnic
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 11.195

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.