Literature DB >> 26431708

Safety and efficiency of femoral artery access closure with a novel biodegradable closure device: a prospective single-centre pilot study.

Karla M Treitl1, Alma Ali2, Marcus Treitl2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Vascular closure devices can accelerate haemostasis after arteriotomy, but induce scarring. The aim of the study was to prospectively analyse the feasibility of a novel biodegradable arterial closure device (CD).
METHODS: Two hundred fifty-five patients (183 male; age 36-98 years) with an access vessel diameter >3 mm received the biodegradable CD after endovascular therapy. Technical success rate, time-to-haemostasis (TTH) and time-to-ambulation (TTA) were measured. Puncture site complications were categorized as minor (local hematoma, minor bleeding) or major (pseudoaneurysm, embolization, dissection, thrombotic occlusion, hematoma/major bleeding requiring surgery, access site infection).
RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 98.8 % (252 cases); device failure occurred in three cases (1.2 %). The average TTH and TTA were 11.3 ± 26.9 s and 73.0 ± 126.3 min. The major complication rate was 1.6 %, with three pseudoaneurysms and one retroperitoneal bleeding. The minor complication rate was 2.0 %, with five small hematomas. Neither cardiovascular risk factors nor access vessel characteristics had statistically significant influence on adverse events. Re-puncture was uncomplicated in 32 cases after 155.0 ± 128.8 days.
CONCLUSIONS: Handling of the new biodegradable CD is safe. The complication rates are tolerably low and comparable to other CDs. Post-procedural sonography showed no significant palpable subcutaneous changes in the access site. KEY POINTS: • VCDs can increase time efficiency and patient comfort after intervention. • In this prospective single-centre-study, biodegradable CD was safe and easily applicable. • Its major and minor complication rates are comparable to other CDs. • Its mean time-to-haemostasis and time-to-ambulation were 11.3 ± 26.9 s and 73.0 ± 126.3 min. • Post-procedural sonography showed no significant palpable subcutaneous changes at the access site.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biodegradable implants; Endovascular techniques; Time-to-ambulation; Time-to-haemostasis; Vascular closure device

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26431708     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-4023-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  16 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of randomized trials on the efficacy of vascular closure devices after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty.

Authors:  Fausto Biancari; Vito D'Andrea; Carlo Di Marco; Grazia Savino; Valentina Tiozzo; Antonio Catania
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 2.  An overview of vascular closure devices: what every radiologist should know.

Authors:  L Q Hon; A Ganeshan; S M Thomas; D Warakaulle; J Jagdish; R Uberoi
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 3.  Quality improvement guidelines for vascular access and closure device use.

Authors:  Rahul A Sheth; T Gregory Walker; Wael E Saad; Sean R Dariushnia; Suvranu Ganguli; Mark J Hogan; Eric J Hohenwalter; Sanjeeva P Kalva; Dheeraj K Rajan; Leann S Stokes; Darryl A Zuckerman; Boris Nikolic
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 4.  Arterial closure devices versus manual compression for femoral haemostasis in interventional radiological procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rajib Das; Kamran Ahmed; Thanos Athanasiou; Robert A Morgan; Anna-Maria Belli
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  [S3 guidelines for diagnostics and treatment of peripheral arterial occlusive disease].

Authors:  P Huppert; J Tacke; H Lawall
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Histologic and duplex comparison of the perclose and angio-seal percutaneous closure devices.

Authors:  Nicholas J Gargiulo; Frank J Veith; Takao Ohki; Lawrence A Scher; George L Berdejo; Evan C Lipsitz; Mark Menegus; Mark Greenberg
Journal:  Vascular       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.285

7.  Effect of a closure device on complication rates in high-local-risk patients: results of a randomized multicenter trial.

Authors:  Bernard Chevalier; Bernard Lancelin; Rene Koning; Michel Henry; Antoine Gommeaux; Remy Pilliere; Meyer Elbaz; Thierry Lefevre; Kamel Boughalem; Jean Marco; Patrick Dupouy
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Vascular complications after balloon and new device angioplasty.

Authors:  J J Popma; L F Satler; A D Pichard; K M Kent; A Campbell; Y C Chuang; C Clark; A J Merritt; T A Bucher; M B Leon
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  CIRSE vascular closure device registry.

Authors:  Jim A Reekers; Stefan Müller-Hülsbeck; Martin Libicher; Eli Atar; Jens Trentmann; Pierre Goffette; Jan Borggrefe; Kamil Zeleňák; Pieter Hooijboer; Anna-Maria Belli
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 10.  Fibronectin at select sites binds multiple growth factors and enhances their activity: expansion of the collaborative ECM-GF paradigm.

Authors:  Jia Zhu; Richard A F Clark
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 8.551

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.