Literature DB >> 11827085

Sublexical or lexical effects on serial recall of nonwords?

Steven Roodenrys1, Melinda Hinton.   

Abstract

S. E. Gathercole, C. R. Frankish, S. J. Pickering, and S. Peaker (1999) reported 2 experiments in which they manipulated phonotactic properties of nonword stimuli and observed the effects on serial recall. Their results show superior recall for items consisting of more frequent phoneme pairs (biphone frequency). Biphone frequency was counted as the number of 3 phoneme words in which the phoneme pair occurs. In the first experiment of the current article, the authors made the same manipulation while controlling for the number of lexical neighbors and found no effect of biphone frequency. In the second experiment, the authors manipulated neighborhood size while controlling biphone frequency and found a significant effect of neighborhood size. The authors argued that serial recall of nonwords is influenced by lexical rather than sublexical knowledge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11827085     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.28.1.29

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  30 in total

1.  Twisting tongues and memories: Explorations of the relationship between language production and verbal working memory.

Authors:  Daniel J Acheson; Maryellen C Macdonald
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  Online learning from input versus offline memory evolution in adult word learning: effects of neighborhood density and phonologically related practice.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel; Daniel E Bontempo; Natalie S Pak
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel; Jonna Armbrüster; Tiffany P Hogan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Phonotactic probability and past tense use by children with specific language impairment and their typically developing peers.

Authors:  Laurence B Leonard; Jennifer Davis; Patricia Deevy
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.346

5.  Phonological similarity neighborhoods and children's short-term memory: typical development and dyslexia.

Authors:  Jennifer M Thomson; Ulla Richardson; Usha Goswami
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-10

6.  The word-length effect provides no evidence for decay in short-term memory.

Authors:  Stephan Lewandowsky; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-10

7.  Visual similarity effects on short-term memory for order: the case of verbally labeled pictorial stimuli.

Authors:  Marie Poirer; Jean Saint-Aubin; Karen Musselwhite; Thulasi Mohanadas; Ghuson Mahammed
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-06

8.  The effect of time on word learning: an examination of decay of the memory trace and vocal rehearsal in children with and without specific language impairment.

Authors:  Mary Alt; Tammie Spaulding
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 2.288

9.  Extracting phonological patterns for L2 word learning: the effect of poor phonological awareness.

Authors:  Chieh-Fang Hu
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2014-10

10.  Word learning by children with phonological delays: differentiating effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel; Jill R Hoover
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 2.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.