Literature DB >> 20215967

Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults.

Arlene C Neuman1, Marcin Wroblewski, Joshua Hajicek, Adrienne Rubinstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to determine how combinations of noise levels and reverberation typical of ranges found in current classrooms will affect speech recognition performance of typically developing children with normal speech, language, and hearing and to compare their performance with that of adults with normal hearing. Speech recognition performance was measured using the Bamford-Kowal-Bench Speech in Noise test. A virtual test paradigm represented the signal reaching a student seated in the back of a classroom with a volume of 228 m and with varied reverberation time (0.3, 0.6, and 0.8 sec). The signal to noise ratios required for 50% performance (SNR-50) and for 95% performance were determined for groups of children aged 6 to 12 yrs and a group of young adults with normal hearing.
DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional developmental study incorporating a repeated measures design. Experimental variables included age and reverberation time. A total of 63 children with normal hearing and typically developing speech and language and nine adults with normal hearing were tested. Nine children were included in each age group (6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 yrs).
RESULTS: The SNR-50 increased significantly with increased reverberation and decreased significantly with increasing age. On average, children required positive SNRs for 50% performance, whereas thresholds for adults were close to 0 dB or <0 dB for the conditions tested. When reverberant SNR-50 was compared with adult SNR-50 without reverberation, adults did not exhibit an SNR loss, but children aged 6 to 8 yrs exhibited a moderate SNR loss and children aged 9 to 12 yrs exhibited a mild SNR loss. To obtain average speech recognition scores of 95% at the back of the classroom, an SNR > or = 10 dB is required for all children at the lowest reverberation time, of > or = 12 dB for children up to age 11 yrs at the 0.6-sec reverberant condition, and of > or = 15 dB for children aged 7 to 11 yrs at the 0.8-sec condition. The youngest children require even higher SNRs in the 0.8-sec condition.
CONCLUSIONS: Results highlight changes in speech recognition performance with age in elementary school children listening to speech in noisy, reverberant classrooms. The more reverberant the environment, the better the SNR required. The younger the child, the better the SNR required. Results support the importance of attention to classroom acoustics and emphasize the need for maximizing SNR in classrooms, especially in classrooms designed for early childhood grades.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20215967     DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181d3d514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  54 in total

1.  Current and planned cochlear implant research at New York University Laboratory for Translational Auditory Research.

Authors:  Mario A Svirsky; Matthew B Fitzgerald; Arlene Neuman; Elad Sagi; Chin-Tuan Tan; Darlene Ketten; Brett Martin
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Experimental investigation of the effects of the acoustical conditions in a simulated classroom on speech recognition and learning in children.

Authors:  Daniel L Valente; Hallie M Plevinsky; John M Franco; Elizabeth C Heinrichs-Graham; Dawna E Lewis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Evaluation of a spectral subtraction strategy to suppress reverberant energy in cochlear implant devices.

Authors:  Kostas Kokkinakis; Christina Runge; Qudsia Tahmina; Yi Hu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Perception of consonants in reverberation and noise by adults fitted with bimodal devices.

Authors:  Michelle Mason; Kostas Kokkinakis
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 5.  Remote Microphone Technology for Children with Hearing Loss or Auditory Processing Issues.

Authors:  Erin C Schafer; Benjamin Kirby; Sharon Miller
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2020-12-16

6.  Reverberation suppression in cochlear implants using a blind channel-selection strategy.

Authors:  Oldooz Hazrati; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Objective speech intelligibility measurement for cochlear implant users in complex listening environments.

Authors:  João F Santos; Stefano Cosentino; Oldooz Hazrati; Philipos C Loizou; Tiago H Falk
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 2.017

8.  [On the effect of reverberation on speech intelligibility by cochlear implant listeners].

Authors:  R Mühler; M Ziese; D Rostalski; J L Verhey
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  Simultaneous suppression of noise and reverberation in cochlear implants using a ratio masking strategy.

Authors:  Oldooz Hazrati; Seyed Omid Sadjadi; Philipos C Loizou; John H L Hansen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Influence of hearing loss on children's identification of spondee words in a speech-shaped noise or a two-talker masker.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Andrea Hillock-Dunn; Nicole Duncan; Patricia A Roush; Emily Buss
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.