Literature DB >> 26450507

Switching between filter settings reduces the efficient utilization of visual working memory.

Kerstin Jost1, Ulrich Mayr2.   

Abstract

The capacity limitation of working memory requires that only relevant information gains access to the workspace, while irrelevant information is kept out. Thus, the ability to use attention to filter out irrelevant information is an important factor in how efficiently the limited storage space is used. Here, we examined to what degree the requirement to flexibly change filter settings affects filtering efficiency. Participants were presented with visual objects in different colors, and a cue presented in advance indicated which objects had to be stored. The contralateral delay activity, an event-related brain potential that reflects working-memory load was used to assess filtering efficiency during the retention interval. The data of two experiments showed that when filter settings had to be adjusted on a trial-by-trial basis, more irrelevant information passed the gate to working memory. Moreover, this switching-induced filtering deficit was restricted to those items that matched the previous, but currently irrelevant, filter settings. Thus, lingering effects of the selection history seem to counteract goal-directed encoding, and thus constitute an important attentional limitation for the efficient utilization of our limited workspace.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contralateral delay activity; Filtering efficiency; Individual differences; Switching between filter settings; Visual working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26450507     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-015-0380-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  36 in total

1.  Long-term memory and the control of attentional control.

Authors:  Ulrich Mayr; David Kuhns; Jason Hubbard
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Age-related top-down suppression deficit in the early stages of cortical visual memory processing.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley; Wesley Clapp; Jon Kelley; Kevin McEvoy; Robert T Knight; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Andrew W McCollough; Maro G Machizawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: investigating a "dimension-weighting" account.

Authors:  A Found; H J Müller
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-01

Review 5.  Top-down modulation: bridging selective attention and working memory.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 6.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

7.  A neural theory of visual attention: bridging cognition and neurophysiology.

Authors:  Claus Bundesen; Thomas Habekost; Soren Kyllingsbaek
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Priming of pop-out modulates attentional target selection in visual search: behavioural and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Martin Eimer; Monika Kiss; Theodore Cheung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Electrophysiological markers of visual dimension changes and response changes.

Authors:  Thomas Töllner; Klaus Gramann; Hermann J Müller; Monika Kiss; Martin Eimer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 10.  Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy.

Authors:  Edward Awh; Artem V Belopolsky; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  5 in total

1.  Gestalt grouping cues can improve filtering performance in visual working memory.

Authors:  Ayala S Allon; Gili Vixman; Roy Luria
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-05-29

2.  Early selection versus late correction: Age-related differences in controlling working memory contents.

Authors:  Tina Schwarzkopp; Ulrich Mayr; Kerstin Jost
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2016-06-02

3.  Selection History Modulates Working Memory Capacity.

Authors:  Bo-Cheng Kuo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-10-07

Review 4.  Allocation of resources in working memory: Theoretical and empirical implications for visual search.

Authors:  Stanislas Huynh Cong; Dirk Kerzel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-03-17

5.  A direct comparison of attentional orienting to spatial and temporal positions in visual working memory.

Authors:  Anna Heuer; Martin Rolfs
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-07-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.