Literature DB >> 17499223

Synchronizing timelines: relations between fixation durations and N400 amplitudes during sentence reading.

Michael Dambacher1, Reinhold Kliegl.   

Abstract

We examined relations between eye movements (single-fixation durations) and RSVP-based event-related potentials (ERPs; N400s) recorded during reading the same sentences in two independent experiments. Longer fixation durations correlated with larger N400 amplitudes. Word frequency and predictability of the fixated word as well as the predictability of the upcoming word accounted for this covariance in a path-analytic model. Moreover, larger N400 amplitudes entailed longer fixation durations on the next word, a relation accounted for by word frequency. This pattern offers a neurophysiological correlate for the lag-word frequency effect on fixation durations: word processing is reliably expressed not only in fixation durations on currently fixated words, but also in those on subsequently fixated words.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17499223     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.04.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  20 in total

1.  Never Seem to Find the Time: Evaluating the Physiological Time Course of Visual Word Recognition with Regression Analysis of Single Item ERPs.

Authors:  Sarah Laszlo; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2014

Review 2.  Eye movements and brain electric potentials during reading.

Authors:  Reinhold Kliegl; Michael Dambacher; Olaf Dimigen; Arthur M Jacobs; Werner Sommer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-09-14

3.  Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition.

Authors:  Daniel Schmidtke; Kazunaga Matsuki; Victor Kuperman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Pay now or pay later: aging and the role of boundary salience in self-regulation of conceptual integration in sentence processing.

Authors:  Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow; Matthew C Shake; Joseph R Miles; Kenton Lee; Xuefei Gao; George McConkie
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2010-03

5.  Subsequent to suppression: Downstream comprehension consequences of noun/verb ambiguity in natural reading.

Authors:  Mallory C Stites; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations.

Authors:  Eyal M Reingold; Erik D Reichle; Mackenzie G Glaholt; Heather Sheridan
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Language processing in reading and speech perception is fast and incremental: implications for event-related potential research.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 3.251

8.  Evidence for direct control of eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Michael Dambacher; Timothy J Slattery; Jinmian Yang; Reinhold Kliegl; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Out of the corner of my eye: Foveal semantic load modulates parafoveal processing in reading.

Authors:  Brennan R Payne; Mallory C Stites; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Word frequency in fast priming: Evidence for immediate cognitive control of eye-movements during reading.

Authors:  Daniel J Schad; Sarah Risse; Timothy Slattery; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2014-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.