Literature DB >> 23413103

Three-dimensional quantification of femoral head shape in controls and patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement.

Michael D Harris1, Shawn P Reese, Christopher L Peters, Jeffrey A Weiss, Andrew E Anderson.   

Abstract

An objective measurement technique to quantify 3D femoral head shape was developed and applied to normal subjects and patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). 3D reconstructions were made from high-resolution CT images of 15 cam and 15 control femurs. Femoral heads were fit to ideal geometries consisting of rotational conchoids and spheres. Geometric similarity between native femoral heads and ideal shapes was quantified. The maximum distance native femoral heads protruded above ideal shapes and the protrusion area were measured. Conchoids provided a significantly better fit to native femoral head geometry than spheres for both groups. Cam-type FAI femurs had significantly greater maximum deviations (4.99 ± 0.39 mm and 4.08 ± 0.37 mm) than controls (2.41 ± 0.31 mm and 1.75 ± 0.30 mm) when fit to spheres or conchoids, respectively. The area of native femoral heads protruding above ideal shapes was significantly larger in controls when a lower threshold of 0.1 mm (for spheres) and 0.01 mm (for conchoids) was used to define a protrusion. The 3D measurement technique described herein could supplement measurements of radiographs in the diagnosis of cam-type FAI. Deviations up to 2.5 mm from ideal shapes can be expected in normal femurs while deviations of 4-5 mm are characteristic of cam-type FAI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23413103      PMCID: PMC3640621          DOI: 10.1007/s10439-013-0762-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  44 in total

Review 1.  Anterior femoroacetabular impingement: part I. Techniques of joint preserving surgery.

Authors:  Martin Lavigne; Javad Parvizi; Martin Beck; Klaus A Siebenrock; Reinhold Ganz; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Abnormal extension of the femoral head epiphysis as a cause of cam impingement.

Authors:  K A Siebenrock; K H A Wahab; S Werlen; M Kalhor; M Leunig; R Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The hip joint as a conchoid shape.

Authors:  F Menschik
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement.

Authors:  H P Nötzli; T F Wyss; C H Stoecklin; M R Schmid; K Treiber; J Hodler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-05

5.  Patient-specific acetabular shape modelling: comparison among sphere, ellipsoid and conchoid parameterisations.

Authors:  Pietro Cerveri; Alfonso Manzotti; Guido Baroni
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 1.763

6.  Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect. A MRI-based quantitative anatomical study of the femoral head-neck offset.

Authors:  K Ito; M A Minka; M Leunig; S Werlen; R Ganz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-03

7.  Etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  W H Harris
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Sex differences in age-related remodeling of the femur and tibia.

Authors:  C B Ruff; W C Hayes
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Acetabular angles and femoral anteversion in dysplastic hips in adults: CT investigation.

Authors:  S Anda; T Terjesen; K A Kvistad; S Svenningsen
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 10.  Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  Reinhold Ganz; Javad Parvizi; Martin Beck; Michael Leunig; Hubert Nötzli; Klaus A Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  20 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: Which Two-dimensional Radiographic Measurements of Cam Femoroacetabular Impingement Best Describe the Three-dimensional Shape of the Proximal Femur?

Authors:  Jonathan H Rylander
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Does Removal of Subchondral Cortical Bone Provide Sufficient Resection Depth for Treatment of Cam Femoroacetabular Impingement?

Authors:  Penny R Atkins; Stephen K Aoki; Ross T Whitaker; Jeffrey A Weiss; Christopher L Peters; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The effect of using different coordinate systems on in-vivo hip angles can be estimated from computed tomography images.

Authors:  Keisuke Uemura; Penny R Atkins; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Correlations between the alpha angle and femoral head asphericity: Implications and recommendations for the diagnosis of cam femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Michael D Harris; Ashley L Kapron; Christopher L Peters; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Statistical shape modeling of cam femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Michael D Harris; Manasi Datar; Ross T Whitaker; Elizabeth R Jurrus; Christopher L Peters; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2013-07-07       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Patient-specific anatomical and functional parameters provide new insights into the pathomechanism of cam FAI.

Authors:  K C Geoffrey Ng; Mario Lamontagne; Andrew P Adamczyk; Kawan S Rakhra; Kawan S Rahkra; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  The influence of radiographic viewing perspective and demographics on the critical shoulder angle.

Authors:  Thomas Suter; Ariane Gerber Popp; Yue Zhang; Chong Zhang; Robert Z Tashjian; Heath B Henninger
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  In-vivo quantification of dynamic hip joint center errors and soft tissue artifact.

Authors:  Niccolo M Fiorentino; Penny R Atkins; Michael J Kutschke; K Bo Foreman; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2016-09-11       Impact factor: 2.840

9.  Accuracy of Functional and Predictive Methods to Calculate the Hip Joint Center in Young Non-pathologic Asymptomatic Adults with Dual Fluoroscopy as a Reference Standard.

Authors:  Niccolo M Fiorentino; Michael J Kutschke; Penny R Atkins; K Bo Foreman; Ashley L Kapron; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  3D CT segmentation of CAM type femoroacetabular impingement-reliability and relationship of CAM lesion with anthropomorphic features.

Authors:  Lihua Zhang; Joel E Wells; Riham Dessouky; Adam Gleason; Rajiv Chopra; Yonatan Chatzinoff; Nicholas P Fey; Yin Xi; Avneesh Chhabra
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.