Literature DB >> 25048279

Patient-specific anatomical and functional parameters provide new insights into the pathomechanism of cam FAI.

K C Geoffrey Ng1, Mario Lamontagne, Andrew P Adamczyk, Kawan S Rakhra, Kawan S Rahkra, Paul E Beaulé.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) represents a constellation of anatomical and clinical features, but definitive diagnosis is often difficult. The high prevalence of cam deformity of the femoral head in the asymptomatic population as well as clinical factors leading to the onset of symptoms raises questions as to what other factors increase the risk of cartilage damage and hip pain. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose was to identify any differences in anatomical parameters and squat kinematics among symptomatic, asymptomatic, and control individuals and if these parameters can determine individuals at risk of developing symptoms of cam FAI.
METHODS: Forty-three participants (n = 43) were recruited and divided into three groups: symptomatic (12), asymptomatic (17), and control (14). Symptomatic participants presented a cam deformity (identified by an elevated alpha angle on CT images), pain symptoms, clinical signs, and were scheduled for surgery. The other recruited volunteers were blinded and unaware whether they had a cam deformity. After the CT data were assessed for an elevated alpha angle, participants with a cam deformity but who did not demonstrate any clinical signs or symptoms were considered asymptomatic, whereas participants without a cam deformity and without clinical signs or symptoms were considered healthy control subjects. For each participant, anatomical CT parameters (axial alpha angle, radial alpha angle, femoral head-neck offset, femoral neck-shaft angle, medial proximal femoral angle, femoral torsion, acetabular version) were evaluated. Functional squat parameters (maximal squat depth, pelvic range of motion) were determined using a motion capture system. A stepwise discriminant function analysis was used to determine which of the parameters were most suitable to classify each participant with their respective subgroup.
RESULTS: The symptomatic group showed elevated alpha angles and lower femoral neck-shaft angles, whereas the asymptomatic group showed elevated alpha angles in comparison with the control group. The best discriminating parameters to determine symptoms were radial alpha angle, femoral neck-shaft angle, and pelvic range of motion (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of a cam deformity, indications of a decreased femoral neck-shaft angle and reduced pelvic range of motion can identify those at risk of symptomatic FAI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25048279      PMCID: PMC4353517          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3797-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  44 in total

1.  New frontiers in cartilage imaging of the hip.

Authors:  Paul E Beaulé; Young-Jo Kim; Kawan S Rakhra; David Stelzeneder; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2012

2.  The relationship between acetabular retroversion and osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  W Y Kim; C E Hutchinson; J G Andrew; P D Allen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-06

Review 3.  Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis--what the radiologist should know.

Authors:  Moritz Tannast; Klaus A Siebenrock; Suzanne E Anderson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Predictors of progression of osteoarthritis in femoroacetabular impingement: a radiological study with a minimum of ten years follow-up.

Authors:  N V Bardakos; R N Villar
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-02

5.  Femoroacetabular impingement: can the alpha angle be estimated?

Authors:  Mohamed R Nouh; Mark E Schweitzer; Leon Rybak; Jodi Cohen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement: early outcomes measures.

Authors:  Christopher M Larson; M Russell Giveans
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Cam impingement causes osteoarthritis of the hip: a nationwide prospective cohort study (CHECK).

Authors:  Rintje Agricola; Marinus P Heijboer; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra; Jan A N Verhaar; Harrie Weinans; Jan H Waarsing
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Acetabular cartilage delamination in femoroacetabular impingement. Risk factors and magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis.

Authors:  Lucas A Anderson; Christopher L Peters; Brandon B Park; Gregory J Stoddard; Jill A Erickson; Julia R Crim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 9.  Femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Ara Kassarjian; Mélanie Brisson; William E Palmer
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 3.528

10.  Is the frog lateral plain radiograph a reliable predictor of the alpha angle in femoroacetabular impingement?

Authors:  S Konan; F Rayan; F S Haddad
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-01
View more
  20 in total

1.  Cam FAI and Smaller Neck Angles Increase Subchondral Bone Stresses During Squatting: A Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  K C Geoffrey Ng; Giulia Mantovani; Mario Lamontagne; Michel R Labrosse; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Does Cartilage Degenerate in Asymptomatic Hips With Cam Morphology?

Authors:  George Grammatopoulos; Gerd Melkus; Kawan Rakhra; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Can combining femoral and acetabular morphology parameters improve the characterization of femoroacetabular impingement?

Authors:  Heinse W Bouma; Tom Hogervorst; Emmanuel Audenaert; Peter Krekel; Paulien M van Kampen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Increased Hip Stresses Resulting From a Cam Deformity and Decreased Femoral Neck-Shaft Angle During Level Walking.

Authors:  K C Geoffrey Ng; Giulia Mantovani; Mario Lamontagne; Michel R Labrosse; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Abnormal Joint Moment Distributions and Functional Performance During Sit-to-Stand in Femoroacetabular Impingement Patients.

Authors:  Michael A Samaan; Benedikt J Schwaiger; Matthew C Gallo; Thomas M Link; Alan L Zhang; Sharmila Majumdar; Richard B Souza
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 2.298

6.  Associations Between Movement Impairments and Function, Treatment Recommendations, and Treatment Plans for People With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.

Authors:  Lindsey Brown-Taylor; Chase Pendley; Kathryn Glaws; W Kelton Vasileff; John Ryan; Marcie Harris-Hayes; Stephanie L Di Stasi
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2021-09-01

7.  Bony morphology of the hip in professional ballet dancers compared to athletes.

Authors:  Susan Mayes; April-Rose Ferris; Peter Smith; Andrew Garnham; Jill Cook
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Etiology of Femoroacetabular Impingement in Athletes: A Review of Recent Findings.

Authors:  Amir A Zadpoor
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 9.  Hip Osteoarthritis: Etiopathogenesis and Implications for Management.

Authors:  Nicholas J Murphy; Jillian P Eyles; David J Hunter
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 10.  Hip Joint Stresses Due to Cam-Type Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review of Finite Element Simulations.

Authors:  K C Geoffrey Ng; Mario Lamontagne; Michel R Labrosse; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.