Literature DB >> 9302622

The hip joint as a conchoid shape.

F Menschik1.   

Abstract

The hip joint is not an exact ball and socket joint. In a meridian section, the mean deviation from a conchoid shape is quite small, so that this shape might better describe the joint's shape. This conclusion was reached by measuring the cartilaginous and osseous shapes of eight normal hip joints (multiorgan donors with average of age 33 yr, range 19-46 yr) using a CNC coordinate measuring machine (CMM). On two additional hip joints, only the osseous shape was determined. A rotational axis was first determined by finding parallels of latitude at the femoral head and acetabulum. At the meridian sections, the best-fitting circle or conchoid was determined from the scanned measuring points, using least-squares regression. Two perpendicular meridians were then measured for each sample and used to evaluate the three-dimensional shape. The medium squared deviation showed a better fit for a conchoid shape compared to a sphere for all samples tested. Furthermore, the equation of the conchoid for the femoral head (r = a + b cos phi) and that for the acetabulum (r' = a' + b' cos phi) were related in that a = b' and b = a' within mean deviation factors of 4%. Their special shape makes the joint less likely to sublux compared to a ball and socket joint. In addition, the rolling and gliding mechanisms between the two shapes may result in less wear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9302622     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(97)00051-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  19 in total

1.  The layer concept: utilization in determining the pain generators, pathology and how structure determines treatment.

Authors:  Peter Draovitch; Jaime Edelstein; Bryan T Kelly
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-03

2.  Effects of idealized joint geometry on finite element predictions of cartilage contact stresses in the hip.

Authors:  Andrew E Anderson; Benjamin J Ellis; Steve A Maas; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  [Fluoroscopy-based 3D navigation of complex correction osteotomies at the proximal femur].

Authors:  R Burgkart; H Gottschling; M Roth; R Gradinger; A Schweikard
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Personalized models of bones based on radiographic photogrammetry.

Authors:  E Berthonnaud; R Hilmi; J Dimnet
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  The accuracy of the use of functional hip motions on localization of the center of the hip.

Authors:  Andrew D Speirs; Daniel L Benoit; Mélanie L Beaulieu; Mario Lamontagne; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-09-07

6.  Articular surface remodeling of the hip after periacetabular osteotomy.

Authors:  Brian J Rasquinha; Junaid Sayani; John F Rudan; Gavin C A Wood; Randy E Ellis
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Morphological analysis of the acetabular cartilage surface in elderly subjects.

Authors:  Keisuke Akiyama; Takashi Sakai; Junichiro Koyanagi; Hideki Yoshikawa; Kazuomi Sugamoto
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 8.  Subject-specific analysis of joint contact mechanics: application to the study of osteoarthritis and surgical planning.

Authors:  Corinne R Henak; Andrew E Anderson; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  Translatory hip kinematics measured with optoelectronic surgical navigation.

Authors:  Sima Zakani; John F Rudan; Randy E Ellis
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 2.924

10.  A new discrete element analysis method for predicting hip joint contact stresses.

Authors:  Christine L Abraham; Steve A Maas; Jeffrey A Weiss; Benjamin J Ellis; Christopher L Peters; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.