Literature DB >> 23832798

Statistical shape modeling of cam femoroacetabular impingement.

Michael D Harris1, Manasi Datar, Ross T Whitaker, Elizabeth R Jurrus, Christopher L Peters, Andrew E Anderson.   

Abstract

Statistical shape modeling (SSM) was used to quantify 3D variation and morphologic differences between femurs with and without cam femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). 3D surfaces were generated from CT scans of femurs from 41 controls and 30 cam FAI patients. SSM correspondence particles were optimally positioned on each surface using a gradient descent energy function. Mean shapes for groups were defined. Morphological differences between group mean shapes and between the control mean and individual patients were calculated. Principal component analysis described anatomical variation. Among all femurs, the first six modes (or principal components) captured significant variations, which comprised 84% of cumulative variation. The first two modes, which described trochanteric height and femoral neck width, were significantly different between groups. The mean cam femur shape protruded above the control mean by a maximum of 3.3 mm with sustained protrusions of 2.5-3.0 mm along the anterolateral head-neck junction/distal anterior neck. SSM described variations in femoral morphology that corresponded well with areas prone to damage. Shape variation described by the first two modes may facilitate objective characterization of cam FAI deformities; variation beyond may be inherent population variance. SSM could characterize disease severity and guide surgical resection of bone.
Copyright © 2013 Orthopaedic Research Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cam; femoroacetabular impingement; hip; statistical shape modeling

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23832798      PMCID: PMC4137561          DOI: 10.1002/jor.22389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  32 in total

1.  Reconstruction and quantification of the carotid artery bifurcation from 3-D ultrasound images.

Authors:  Dean C Barratt; Ben B Ariff; Keith N Humphries; Simon A McG Thom; Alun D Hughes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Abnormal extension of the femoral head epiphysis as a cause of cam impingement.

Authors:  K A Siebenrock; K H A Wahab; S Werlen; M Kalhor; M Leunig; R Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: evaluation of the effect of the size of the resection. Surgical technique.

Authors:  Rodrigo M Mardones; Carlos Gonzalez; Qingshan Chen; Mark Zobitz; Kenton R Kaufman; Robert T Trousdale
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Treatment of femoro-acetabular impingement with surgical dislocation and débridement in young adults.

Authors:  Christopher L Peters; Jill A Erickson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Three-dimensional computed tomography of the hip in the assessment of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Paul E Beaulé; Edward Zaragoza; Kambiz Motamedi; Nathan Copelan; Frederick J Dorey
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Three-dimensional quantification of femoral head shape in controls and patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Michael D Harris; Shawn P Reese; Christopher L Peters; Jeffrey A Weiss; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  M Beck; M Kalhor; M Leunig; R Ganz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-07

8.  The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement.

Authors:  H P Nötzli; T F Wyss; C H Stoecklin; M R Schmid; K Treiber; J Hodler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-05

9.  Sex differences in age-related remodeling of the femur and tibia.

Authors:  C B Ruff; W C Hayes
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 10.  Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  Reinhold Ganz; Javad Parvizi; Martin Beck; Michael Leunig; Hubert Nötzli; Klaus A Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  32 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: Which Two-dimensional Radiographic Measurements of Cam Femoroacetabular Impingement Best Describe the Three-dimensional Shape of the Proximal Femur?

Authors:  Jonathan H Rylander
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Coracoacromial morphology: a contributor to recurrent traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability?

Authors:  Matthijs Jacxsens; Shireen Y Elhabian; Sarah E Brady; Peter N Chalmers; Robert Z Tashjian; Heath B Henninger
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Does Removal of Subchondral Cortical Bone Provide Sufficient Resection Depth for Treatment of Cam Femoroacetabular Impingement?

Authors:  Penny R Atkins; Stephen K Aoki; Ross T Whitaker; Jeffrey A Weiss; Christopher L Peters; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Multiscale musculoskeletal modelling, data-model fusion and electromyography-informed modelling.

Authors:  J Fernandez; J Zhang; T Heidlauf; M Sartori; T Besier; O Röhrle; D Lloyd
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 3.906

5.  Deformable multisurface segmentation of the spine for orthopedic surgery planning and simulation.

Authors:  Rabia Haq; Jérôme Schmid; Roderick Borgie; Joshua Cates; Michel A Audette
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-02-22

6.  Patient-specific anatomical and functional parameters provide new insights into the pathomechanism of cam FAI.

Authors:  K C Geoffrey Ng; Mario Lamontagne; Andrew P Adamczyk; Kawan S Rakhra; Kawan S Rahkra; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Statistical shape modeling of femur shape variability in female patients with hip dysplasia.

Authors:  Brecca M M Gaffney; Travis J Hillen; Jeffrey J Nepple; John C Clohisy; Michael D Harris
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Early morphologic changes in trapeziometacarpal joint bones with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  M T Y Schneider; J Zhang; C G Walker; J J Crisco; A-P C Weiss; A L Ladd; P M F Nielsen; T Besier
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  Which Two-dimensional Radiographic Measurements of Cam Femoroacetabular Impingement Best Describe the Three-dimensional Shape of the Proximal Femur?

Authors:  Penny R Atkins; YoungJae Shin; Praful Agrawal; Shireen Y Elhabian; Ross T Whitaker; Jeffrey A Weiss; Stephen K Aoki; Christopher L Peters; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Cam deformity and the omega angle, a novel quantitative measurement of femoral head-neck morphology: a 3D CT gender analysis in asymptomatic subjects.

Authors:  Vasco V Mascarenhas; Paulo Rego; Pedro Dantas; Augusto Gaspar; Francisco Soldado; José G Consciência
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.