Literature DB >> 30516653

CORR Insights®: Which Two-dimensional Radiographic Measurements of Cam Femoroacetabular Impingement Best Describe the Three-dimensional Shape of the Proximal Femur?

Jonathan H Rylander1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2019        PMID： 30516653      PMCID： PMC6345309          DOI： 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN： 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


× No keyword cloud information.
  11 in total

1.  Validity of the alpha angle measurement on plain radiographs in the evaluation of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Cefin Barton; Matias J Salineros; Kawan S Rakhra; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: evaluation of the effect of the size of the resection. Surgical technique.

Authors:  Rodrigo M Mardones; Carlos Gonzalez; Qingshan Chen; Mark Zobitz; Kenton R Kaufman; Robert T Trousdale
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Radiographic evaluation of the hip has limited reliability.

Authors:  John C Clohisy; John C Carlisle; Robert Trousdale; Young-Jo Kim; Paul E Beaule; Patrick Morgan; Karen Steger-May; Perry L Schoenecker; Michael Millis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip.

Authors:  John C Clohisy; John C Carlisle; Paul E Beaulé; Young-Jo Kim; Robert T Trousdale; Rafael J Sierra; Michael Leunig; Perry L Schoenecker; Michael B Millis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 5.  A review of femoroacetabular impingement in athletes.

Authors:  Michael J Keogh; Mark E Batt
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Statistical shape modeling of cam femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Michael D Harris; Manasi Datar; Ross T Whitaker; Elizabeth R Jurrus; Christopher L Peters; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2013-07-07       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Three-dimensional quantification of femoral head shape in controls and patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Michael D Harris; Shawn P Reese; Christopher L Peters; Jeffrey A Weiss; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Which Two-dimensional Radiographic Measurements of Cam Femoroacetabular Impingement Best Describe the Three-dimensional Shape of the Proximal Femur?

Authors:  Penny R Atkins; YoungJae Shin; Praful Agrawal; Shireen Y Elhabian; Ross T Whitaker; Jeffrey A Weiss; Stephen K Aoki; Christopher L Peters; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Quantitative comparison of cortical bone thickness using correspondence-based shape modeling in patients with cam femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Penny R Atkins; Shireen Y Elhabian; Praful Agrawal; Michael D Harris; Ross T Whitaker; Jeffrey A Weiss; Christopher L Peters; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Emerging ideas: Novel 3-D quantification and classification of cam lesions in patients with femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Richard W Kang; Adam B Yanke; Alejandro A Espinoza Orias; Alejandro Espinoza Orias; Nozomu Inoue; Shane J Nho
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 4.176
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.