Isabelle Mosnier1, Olivier Sterkers2, Yann Nguyen2, Ghizlene Lahlou2. 1. UF Implants Auditifs et Explorations Fonctionnelles, Service ORL, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Sorbonne Université, GHU Pitié-Salpêtrière Boulevard de l'Hôpital, Bâtiment Paul Castaigne, 47-83 Bd de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France. isabelle.mosnier@aphp.fr. 2. UF Implants Auditifs et Explorations Fonctionnelles, Service ORL, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Sorbonne Université, GHU Pitié-Salpêtrière Boulevard de l'Hôpital, Bâtiment Paul Castaigne, 47-83 Bd de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Some oldest patients rehabilitated with a cochlear implant more than 20 years ago could still be upgraded with new generations of speech processor (SP). The aim of this study was to show the benefit of a recent generation of SP in this population. METHODS: A monocentric prospective study was designed to evaluate the performance of 33 ancient CI22M users implanted between 1989 and 1997 and upgraded with the late compatible sound processor CP900. Performance was evaluated in quiet and noise with Framatix, an automated adaptative test. RESULTS: Performance using Framatix significantly improved with the CP900, with a decrease of the median speech perception threshold of 6 dB in quiet (p < 0.05) and 5,3 dB in noise (p < 0.0005). No subjective benefit using the APHAB questionnaire was observed. CONCLUSION: Upgrading of cochlear implant recipients who were implanted more than 20 years ago with recent compatible and new technological SP provide benefit in speech recognition in noise.
PURPOSE: Some oldest patients rehabilitated with a cochlear implant more than 20 years ago could still be upgraded with new generations of speech processor (SP). The aim of this study was to show the benefit of a recent generation of SP in this population. METHODS: A monocentric prospective study was designed to evaluate the performance of 33 ancient CI22M users implanted between 1989 and 1997 and upgraded with the late compatible sound processor CP900. Performance was evaluated in quiet and noise with Framatix, an automated adaptative test. RESULTS: Performance using Framatix significantly improved with the CP900, with a decrease of the median speech perception threshold of 6 dB in quiet (p < 0.05) and 5,3 dB in noise (p < 0.0005). No subjective benefit using the APHAB questionnaire was observed. CONCLUSION: Upgrading of cochlear implant recipients who were implanted more than 20 years ago with recent compatible and new technological SP provide benefit in speech recognition in noise.
Entities:
Keywords:
Hearing in noise; Long-term benefit; Speech processor; Upgrading
Authors: Sofie Jansen; Heleen Luts; Kirsten Carola Wagener; Birger Kollmeier; Matthieu Del Rio; René Dauman; Chris James; Bernard Fraysse; Emilie Vormès; Bruno Frachet; Jan Wouters; Astrid van Wieringen Journal: Int J Audiol Date: 2011-11-28 Impact factor: 2.117
Authors: Gill Livingston; Andrew Sommerlad; Vasiliki Orgeta; Sergi G Costafreda; Jonathan Huntley; David Ames; Clive Ballard; Sube Banerjee; Alistair Burns; Jiska Cohen-Mansfield; Claudia Cooper; Nick Fox; Laura N Gitlin; Robert Howard; Helen C Kales; Eric B Larson; Karen Ritchie; Kenneth Rockwood; Elizabeth L Sampson; Quincy Samus; Lon S Schneider; Geir Selbæk; Linda Teri; Naaheed Mukadam Journal: Lancet Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 202.731