Literature DB >> 28664331

Benefit of the UltraZoom beamforming technology in noise in cochlear implant users.

Isabelle Mosnier1,2, Nathalie Mathias3, Jonathan Flament4,5, Dorith Amar4,5, Amelie Liagre-Callies4, Stephanie Borel4, Emmanuèle Ambert-Dahan4, Olivier Sterkers6,4, Daniele Bernardeschi6,4.   

Abstract

The objectives of the study were to demonstrate the audiological and subjective benefits of the adaptive UltraZoom beamforming technology available in the Naída CI Q70 sound processor, in cochlear-implanted adults upgraded from a previous generation sound processor. Thirty-four adults aged between 21 and 89 years (mean 53 ± 19) were prospectively included. Nine subjects were unilaterally implanted, 11 bilaterally and 14 were bimodal users. The mean duration of cochlear implant use was 7 years (range 5-15 years). Subjects were tested in quiet with monosyllabic words and in noise with the adaptive French Matrix test in the best-aided conditions. The test setup contained a signal source in front of the subject and three noise sources at +/-90° and 180°. The noise was presented at a fixed level of 65 dB SPL and the level of speech signal was varied to obtain the speech reception threshold (SRT). During the upgrade visit, subjects were tested with the Harmony and with the Naída CI sound processors in omnidirectional microphone configuration. After a take-home phase of 2 months, tests were repeated with the Naída CI processor with and without UltraZoom. Subjective assessment of the sound quality in daily environments was recorded using the APHAB questionnaire. No difference in performance was observed in quiet between the two processors. The Matrix test in noise was possible in the 21 subjects with the better performance. No difference was observed between the two processors for performance in noise when using the omnidirectional microphone. At the follow-up session, the median SRT with the Naída CI processor with UltraZoom was -4 dB compared to -0.45 dB without UltraZoom. The use of UltraZoom improved the median SRT by 3.6 dB (p < 0.0001, Wilcoxon paired test). When looking at the APHAB outcome, improvement was observed for speech understanding in noisy environments (p < 0.01) and in aversive situations (p < 0.05) in the group of 21 subjects who were able to perform the Matrix test in noise and for speech understanding in noise (p < 0.05) in the group of 13 subjects with the poorest performance, who were not able to perform the Matrix test in noise. The use of UltraZoom beamforming technology, available on the new sound processor Naída CI, improves speech performance in difficult and realistic noisy conditions when the cochlear implant user needs to focus on the person speaking at the front. Using the APHAB questionnaire, a subjective benefit for listening in background noise was also observed in subjects with good performance as well as in those with poor performance. This study highlighted the importance of upgrading CI recipients to new technology and to include assessment in noise and subjective feedback evaluation as part of the process.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Speech intelligibility in noise; Speech processor; Subjective benefit; Upgrading

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28664331     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-017-4651-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  18 in total

1.  Performance of an adaptive beamforming noise reduction scheme for hearing aid applications. II. Experimental verification of the predictions.

Authors:  M Kompis; N Dillier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Comparison of three types of French speech-in-noise tests: a multi-center study.

Authors:  Sofie Jansen; Heleen Luts; Kirsten Carola Wagener; Birger Kollmeier; Matthieu Del Rio; René Dauman; Chris James; Bernard Fraysse; Emilie Vormès; Bruno Frachet; Jan Wouters; Astrid van Wieringen
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Speech understanding in background noise with the two-microphone adaptive beamformer BEAM in the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear Implant System.

Authors:  Ann Spriet; Lieselot Van Deun; Kyriaky Eftaxiadis; Johan Laneau; Marc Moonen; Bas van Dijk; Astrid van Wieringen; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Adam A Hersbach; Komal Arora; Stefan J Mauger; Pam W Dawson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Robustness of an adaptive beamforming method for hearing aids.

Authors:  P M Peterson; S M Wei; W M Rabinowitz; P M Zurek
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1990

6.  Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable.

Authors:  A R Thornton; M J Raffin
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1978-09

7.  Results of a pilot study with a signal enhancement algorithm for HiRes 120 cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Andreas Buechner; Martina Brendel; Hilke Saalfeld; Leonid Litvak; Carolin Frohne-Buechner; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Evaluation of different signal processing options in unilateral and bilateral cochlear freedom implant recipients using R-Space background noise.

Authors:  Alison M Brockmeyer; Lisa G Potts
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Cochlear implant microphone location affects speech recognition in diffuse noise.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Kolberg; Sterling W Sheffield; Timothy J Davis; Linsey W Sunderhaus; René H Gifford
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 10.  An evidence-based systematic review of directional microphones and digital noise reduction hearing aids in school-age children with hearing loss.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Rebecca A Venediktov; Jaumeiko J Coleman; Hillary M Leech
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 1.493

View more
  7 in total

1.  Benefits in noise from sound processor upgrade in thirty-three cochlear implant users for more than 20 years.

Authors:  Isabelle Mosnier; Olivier Sterkers; Yann Nguyen; Ghizlene Lahlou
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Effect of Microphone Configuration and Sound Source Location on Speech Recognition for Adult Cochlear Implant Users with Current-Generation Sound Processors.

Authors:  Robert T Dwyer; Jillian Roberts; René H Gifford
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  [Influence of directional microphones on listening effort in middle ear implant users].

Authors:  Daniela Hollfelder; Lukas Prein; Tim Jürgens; Anke Leichtle; Karl-Ludwig Bruchhage
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 1.330

4.  Effect of Microphone Location and Beamforming Technology on Speech Recognition in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Jourdan T Holder; Adrian L Taylor; Linsey W Sunderhaus; René H Gifford
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Speech Intelligibility and Spatial Release From Masking Improvements Using Spatial Noise Reduction Algorithms in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Ayham Zedan; Tim Jürgens; Ben Williges; Birger Kollmeier; Konstantin Wiebe; Julio Galindo; Thomas Wesarg
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Adult Users of the Oticon Medical Neuro Cochlear Implant System Benefit from Beamforming in the High Frequencies.

Authors:  Bianca Bastos Cordeiro; Marcos Roberto Banhara; Carlos Maurício Cardeal Mendes; Fabiana Danieli; Ariane Laplante-Lévesque; Chadlia Karoui; Michel Hoen; Marine Ardoint; Fanny Gauvrit; Romane Demullier; Christophe Vincent
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2021-04-16

7.  Speech understanding in diffuse steady noise in typically hearing and hard of hearing listeners.

Authors:  Julie Bestel; Elsa Legris; Frédéric Rembaud; Thierry Mom; John J Galvin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 3.752

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.