Literature DB >> 28674975

Elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: can preoperative imaging descriptors improve the predictive power of a survival model?

Mina Park1,2, Seung-Koo Lee1, Jong Hee Chang3, Seok-Gu Kang3, Eui Hyun Kim3, Se Hoon Kim4, Mi Kyung Song5, Bo Gyoung Ma5, Sung Soo Ahn6.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify independent prognostic factors among preoperative imaging features in elderly glioblastoma patients and to evaluate whether these imaging features, in addition to clinical features, could enhance the predictive power of survival models. This retrospective study included 108 patients ≥65 years of age with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Preoperative clinical features (age and KPS), postoperative clinical features (extent of surgery and postoperative treatment), and preoperative MRI features were assessed. Univariate and multivariate cox proportional hazards regression analyses for overall survival were performed. The integrated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (iAUC) was calculated to evaluate the added value of imaging features in the survival model. External validation was independently performed with 40 additional patients ≥65 years of age with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Eloquent area involvement, multifocality, and ependymal involvement on preoperative MRI as well as clinical features including age, preoperative KPS, extent of resection, and postoperative treatment were significantly associated with overall survival on univariate Cox regression. On multivariate analysis, extent of resection and ependymal involvement were independently associated with overall survival and preoperative KPS showed borderline significance. The model with both preoperative clinical and imaging features showed improved prediction of overall survival compared to the model with preoperative clinical features (iAUC, 0.670 vs. 0.600, difference 0.066, 95% CI 0.021-0.121). Analysis of the validation set yielded similar results (iAUC, 0.790 vs. 0.670, difference 0.123, 95% CI 0.021-0.260), externally validating this observation. Preoperative imaging features, including eloquent area involvement, multifocality, and ependymal involvement, in addition to clinical features, can improve the predictive power for overall survival in elderly glioblastoma patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aged; Glioblastoma; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prognosis; Survival analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28674975     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-017-2544-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  42 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of preoperative MRI scans in glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  M A Hammoud; R Sawaya; W Shi; P F Thall; N E Leeds
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Outcome of conventional treatment and prognostic factor in elderly glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Sung Woon Oh; Tae Keun Jee; Doo-Sik Kong; Do-Hyun Nam; Jung-Il Lee; Ho Jun Seol
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  Recursive partitioning analysis of prognostic factors in three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group malignant glioma trials.

Authors:  W J Curran; C B Scott; J Horton; J S Nelson; A S Weinstein; A J Fischbach; C H Chang; M Rotman; S O Asbell; R E Krisch
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-05-05       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  A proposed classification system that projects outcomes based on preoperative variables for adult patients with glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Kaisorn Chaichana; Scott Parker; Alessandro Olivi; Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 5.  Epidemiology of primary brain tumors: current concepts and review of the literature.

Authors:  Margaret Wrensch; Yuriko Minn; Terri Chew; Melissa Bondy; Mitchel S Berger
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.300

6.  MR imaging predictors of molecular profile and survival: multi-institutional study of the TCGA glioblastoma data set.

Authors:  David A Gutman; Lee A D Cooper; Scott N Hwang; Chad A Holder; Jingjing Gao; Tarun D Aurora; William D Dunn; Lisa Scarpace; Tom Mikkelsen; Rajan Jain; Max Wintermark; Manal Jilwan; Prashant Raghavan; Erich Huang; Robert J Clifford; Pattanasak Mongkolwat; Vladimir Kleper; John Freymann; Justin Kirby; Pascal O Zinn; Carlos S Moreno; Carl Jaffe; Rivka Colen; Daniel L Rubin; Joel Saltz; Adam Flanders; Daniel J Brat
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Glioblastoma in the elderly: the effect of aggressive and modern therapies on survival.

Authors:  Ranjith Babu; Jordan M Komisarow; Vijay J Agarwal; Shervin Rahimpour; Akshita Iyer; Dylan Britt; Isaac O Karikari; Peter M Grossi; Steven Thomas; Allan H Friedman; Cory Adamson
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Presentation, management, and outcome of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in elderly patients.

Authors:  Shota Tanaka; Fredric B Meyer; Jan C Buckner; Joon H Uhm; Elizabeth S Yan; Ian F Parney
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Outcomes in newly diagnosed elderly glioblastoma patients after concomitant temozolomide administration and hypofractionated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Ludovic T Nguyen; Socheat Touch; Hélène Nehme-Schuster; Delphine Antoni; Sokha Eav; Jean-Baptiste Clavier; Nicolas Bauer; Céline Vigneron; Roland Schott; Pierre Kehrli; Georges Noël
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  A comparison of long-term survivors and short-term survivors with glioblastoma, subventricular zone involvement: a predictive factor for survival?

Authors:  Sebastian Adeberg; Tilman Bostel; Laila König; Thomas Welzel; Juergen Debus; Stephanie E Combs
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.481

View more
  3 in total

1.  Surgical treatment of glioblastoma in the elderly: the impact of complications.

Authors:  Michael Karsy; Nam Yoon; Lillian Boettcher; Randy Jensen; Lubdha Shah; Joel MacDonald; Sarah T Menacho
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Effect of patient age on glioblastoma perioperative treatment costs: a value driven outcome database analysis.

Authors:  Brandon A Sherrod; Nicholas T Gamboa; Christopher Wilkerson; Herschel Wilde; Mohammed A Azab; Michael Karsy; Randy L Jensen; Sarah T Menacho
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Identification of magnetic resonance imaging features for the prediction of molecular profiles of newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Authors:  Sung Soo Ahn; Chansik An; Yae Won Park; Kyunghwa Han; Jong Hee Chang; Se Hoon Kim; Seung-Koo Lee; Soonmee Cha
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.130

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.