Literature DB >> 23382621

Advanced endoscopic technologies for colorectal cancer screening.

Keith L Obstein, Pietro Valdastri.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in men and the second most common cancer in women worldwide. Diagnosing colorectal has been increasingly successful due to advances in technology. Flexible endoscopy is considered to be an effective method for early diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal cancer, making it a popular choice for screening programs. However, millions of people who may benefit from endoscopic colorectal cancer screening fail to have the procedure performed. Main reasons include psychological barriers due to the indignity of the procedure, fear of procedure related pain, bowel preparation discomfort, and potential need for sedation. Therefore, an urgent need for new technologies addressing these issues clearly exists. In this review, we discuss a set of advanced endoscopic technologies for colorectal cancer screening that are either already available or close to clinical trial. In particular, we focus on visual-inspection-only advanced flexible colonoscopes, interventional colonoscopes with alternative propulsion mechanisms, wireless capsule colonoscopy, and technologies for intraprocedural bowel cleansing. Many of these devices have the potential to reduce exam related patient discomfort, obviate the need for sedation, increase diagnostic yield, reduce learning curves, improve access to screening, and possibly avert the need for a bowel preparation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Capsule colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer; Endoscopy; Screening; Technology

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23382621      PMCID: PMC3558566          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i4.431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  51 in total

1.  Development of a colon endoscope robot that adjusts its locomotion through the use of reinforcement learning.

Authors:  G Trovato; M Shikanai; G Ukawa; J Kinoshita; N Murai; J W Lee; H Ishii; A Takanishi; K Tanoue; S Ieiri; K Konishi; M Hashizume
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Magnetic shells for gastrointestinal endoscopic capsules as a means to control their motion.

Authors:  Federico Carpi; Stefano Galbiati; Angelo Carpi
Journal:  Biomed Pharmacother       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 6.529

3.  Wireless therapeutic endoscopic capsule: in vivo experiment.

Authors:  P Valdastri; C Quaglia; E Susilo; A Menciassi; P Dario; C N Ho; G Anhoeck; M O Schurr
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Controlled navigation of endoscopic capsules: concept and preliminary experimental investigations.

Authors:  Federico Carpi; Stefano Galbiati; Angelo Carpi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Functional evaluation of the endotics system, a new disposable self-propelled robotic colonoscope: in vitro tests and clinical trial.

Authors:  Felice Cosentino; Emanuele Tumino; Giovanni Rubis Passoni; Elisabetta Morandi; Alfonso Capria
Journal:  Int J Artif Organs       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.595

6.  MedJet--a new CO2-based disposable cleaning device allows safe and effective bowel cleansing during colonoscopy: a pilot study.

Authors:  R Kiesslich; N Schuster; A Hoffman; M Goetz; P R Galle; E Santo; Z Halpern
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  Computer-assisted colonoscopy (the NeoGuide Endoscopy System): results of the first human clinical trial ("PACE study").

Authors:  Axel Eickhoff; Jacques van Dam; Ralf Jakobs; Valerie Kudis; Dirk Hartmann; Ulrich Damian; Uwe Weickert; Dieter Schilling; Jürgen F Riemann
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Inspection of the human stomach using remote-controlled capsule endoscopy: a feasibility study in healthy volunteers (with videos).

Authors:  Jutta Keller; Christiane Fibbe; Frank Volke; Jeremy Gerber; Alexander C Mosse; Meike Reimann-Zawadzki; Elisha Rabinovitz; Peter Layer; Daniel Schmitt; Viola Andresen; Ulrich Rosien; Paul Swain
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Prospective multicenter performance evaluation of the second-generation colon capsule compared with colonoscopy.

Authors:  R Eliakim; K Yassin; Y Niv; Y Metzger; J Lachter; E Gal; B Sapoznikov; F Konikoff; G Leichtmann; Z Fireman; Y Kopelman; S N Adler
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  An adequate level of training for technical competence in screening and diagnostic colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter evaluation of the learning curve.

Authors:  Suck-Ho Lee; Il-Kwun Chung; Sun-Joo Kim; Jin-Oh Kim; Bong-Min Ko; Young Hwangbo; Won Ho Kim; Dong Hun Park; Sang Kil Lee; Cheol Hee Park; Il-Hyun Baek; Dong Il Park; Seun-Ja Park; Jeong-Seon Ji; Byung-Ik Jang; Yoon-Tae Jeen; Jeong Eun Shin; Jeong-Sik Byeon; Chang-Soo Eun; Dong Soo Han
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Current state of micro-robots/devices as substitutes for screening colonoscopy: assessment based on technology readiness levels.

Authors:  Silvia C Tapia-Siles; Stuart Coleman; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Autonomously Controlled Magnetic Flexible Endoscope for Colon Exploration.

Authors:  Piotr R Slawinski; Addisu Z Taddese; Kyle B Musto; Shabnam Sarker; Pietro Valdastri; Keith L Obstein
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Emerging Issues and Future Developments in Capsule Endoscopy.

Authors:  Piotr R Slawinski; Keith L Obstein; Pietro Valdastri
Journal:  Tech Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-01-01

4.  Endoscopists with low adenoma detection rates benefit from high-definition endoscopy.

Authors:  Elisabeth Waldmann; Martha Britto-Arias; Irina Gessl; Georg Heinze; Petra Salzl; Daniela Sallinger; Michael Trauner; Werner Weiss; Arnulf Ferlitsch; Monika Ferlitsch
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Colorectal cancer: from prevention to personalized medicine.

Authors:  Gemma Binefa; Francisco Rodríguez-Moranta; Alex Teule; Manuel Medina-Hayas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Intelligent magnetic manipulation for gastrointestinal ultrasound.

Authors:  Joseph C Norton; Piotr R Slawinski; Holly S Lay; James W Martin; Benjamin F Cox; Gerard Cummins; Marc P Y Desmulliez; Richard E Clutton; Keith L Obstein; Sandy Cochran; Pietro Valdastri
Journal:  Sci Robot       Date:  2019-06-19

Review 7.  Efficacy of ultra-low volume (≤1 L) bowel preparation fluids: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Milou L M van Riswijk; Kelly E van Keulen; Peter D Siersema
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 6.337

8.  Feasibility of automated target centralization in colonoscopy.

Authors:  N van der Stap; E D Rozeboom; H J M Pullens; F van der Heijden; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  A hydraulically driven colonoscope.

Authors:  Stuart A Coleman; Silvia C Tapia-Siles; Markus Pakleppa; Jan B Vorstius; Robert P Keatch; Benjie Tang; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Cecal intubation rates in different eras of endoscopic technological development.

Authors:  Maciej Matyja; Artur Pasternak; Mirosław Szura; Michał Pędziwiatr; Piotr Major; Kazimierz Rembiasz
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 1.195

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.