Literature DB >> 19844894

Functional evaluation of the endotics system, a new disposable self-propelled robotic colonoscope: in vitro tests and clinical trial.

Felice Cosentino1, Emanuele Tumino, Giovanni Rubis Passoni, Elisabetta Morandi, Alfonso Capria.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Currently, the best method for CRC screening is colonoscopy, which ideally (where possible) is performed under partial or deep sedation. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of the Endotics System, a new robotic device composed of a workstation and a disposable probe, in performing accurate and well-tolerated colonoscopies. This new system could also be considered a precursor of other innovating vectors for atraumatic locomotion through natural orifices such as the bowel. The flexible probe adapts its shape to the complex contours of the colon, thereby exerting low strenuous forces during its movement. These novel characteristics allow for a painless and safe colonoscopy, thus eliminating all major associated risks such as infection, cardiopulmonary complications and colon perforation.
METHODS: An experimental study was devised to investigate stress pattern differences between traditional and robotic colonoscopy, in which 40 enrolled patients underwent both robotic and standard colonoscopy within the same day.
RESULTS: The stress pattern related to robotic colonoscopy was 90% lower than that of standard colonoscopy. Additionally, the robotic colonoscopy demonstrated a higher diagnostic accuracy, since, due to the lower insufflation rate, it was able to visualize small polyps and angiodysplasias not seen during the standard colonoscopy. All patients rated the robotic colonoscopy as virtually painless compared to the standard colonoscopy, ranking pain and discomfort as 0.9 and 1.1 respectively, on a scale of O to 10, versus 6.9 and 6.8 respectively for the standard device.
CONCLUSIONS: The new Endotics System demonstrates efficacy in the diagnosis of colonic pathologies using a procedure nearly completely devoid of pain. Therefore, this system can also be looked upon as the first step toward developing and implementing colonoscopy with atraumatic locomotion through the bowel while maintaining a high level of diagnostic accuracy;

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19844894     DOI: 10.1177/039139880903200806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Artif Organs        ISSN: 0391-3988            Impact factor:   1.595


  20 in total

Review 1.  Application of robotics in gastrointestinal endoscopy: A review.

Authors:  Baldwin Po Man Yeung; Philip Wai Yan Chiu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Evaluation of a novel flexible snake robot for endoluminal surgery.

Authors:  Nisha Patel; Carlo A Seneci; Jianzhong Shang; Konrad Leibrandt; Guang-Zhong Yang; Ara Darzi; Julian Teare
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Robotic colonoscopy: efficacy, tolerability and safety. Preliminary clinical results from a pilot study.

Authors:  Antonello Trecca; Filippo Catalano; Antonino Bella; Raffaele Borghini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Nonparametric Online Learning Control for Soft Continuum Robot: An Enabling Technique for Effective Endoscopic Navigation.

Authors:  Kit-Hang Lee; Denny K C Fu; Martin C W Leong; Marco Chow; Hing-Choi Fu; Kaspar Althoefer; Kam Yim Sze; Chung-Kwong Yeung; Ka-Wai Kwok
Journal:  Soft Robot       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 8.071

5.  Endotics system vs colonoscopy for the detection of polyps.

Authors:  Emanuele Tumino; Rodolfo Sacco; Marco Bertini; Michele Bertoni; Giuseppe Parisi; Alfonso Capria
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Robotics in Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Dan Cater; Arpita Vyas; Dinesh Vyas
Journal:  Am J Robot Surg       Date:  2014-06

Review 7.  Advanced endoscopic technologies for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Keith L Obstein; Pietro Valdastri
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Colonoscopy, pain and fears: Is it an indissoluble trinomial?

Authors:  Lucio Trevisani; Angelo Zelante; Sergio Sartori
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-06-16

9.  A Novel Inchworm-Inspired Soft Robotic Colonoscope Based on a Rubber Bellows.

Authors:  Jinyan Chen; Jianlin Yang; Feng Qian; Qing Lu; Yu Guo; Zhijun Sun; Chao Chen
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-17       Impact factor: 3.523

Review 10.  The endoscopy evolution: 'the superscope era'.

Authors:  Nisha Patel; Ara Darzi; Julian Teare
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.