Literature DB >> 24944469

Colorectal cancer: from prevention to personalized medicine.

Gemma Binefa1, Francisco Rodríguez-Moranta1, Alex Teule1, Manuel Medina-Hayas1.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a very heterogeneous disease that is caused by the interaction of genetic and environmental factors. CRC develops through a gradual accumulation of genetic and epigenetic changes, leading to the transformation of normal colonic mucosa into invasive cancer. CRC is one of the most prevalent and incident cancers worldwide, as well as one of the most deadly. Approximately 1235108 people are diagnosed annually with CRC, and 609051 die from CRC annually. The World Health Organization estimates an increase of 77% in the number of newly diagnosed cases of CRC and an increase of 80% in deaths from CRC by 2030. The incidence of CRC can benefit from different strategies depending on its stage: health promotion through health education campaigns (when the disease is not yet present), the implementation of screening programs (for detection of the disease in its early stages), and the development of nearly personalized treatments according to both patient characteristics (age, sex) and the cancer itself (gene expression). Although there are different strategies for screening and although the number of such strategies is increasing due to the potential of emerging technologies in molecular marker application, not all strategies meet the criteria required for screening tests in population programs; the three most accepted tests are the fecal occult blood test (FOBT), colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy. FOBT is the most used method for CRC screening worldwide and is also the primary choice in most population-based screening programs in Europe. Due to its non-invasive nature and low cost, it is one of the most accepted techniques by population. CRC is a very heterogeneous disease, and with a few exceptions (APC, p53, KRAS), most of the genes involved in CRC are observed in a small percentage of cases. The design of genetic and epigenetic marker panels that are able to provide maximum coverage in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia seems a reasonable strategy. In recent years, the use of DNA, RNA and protein markers in different biological samples has been explored as strategies for CRC diagnosis. Although there is not yet sufficient evidence to recommend the analysis of biomarkers such as DNA, RNA or proteins in the blood or stool, it is likely that given the quick progression of technology tools in molecular biology, increasingly sensitive and less expensive, these tools will gradually be employed in clinical practice and will likely be developed in mass.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biological markers; Colorectal cancer; Drug therapy; Mass screening; Prevention

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24944469      PMCID: PMC4051918          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i22.6786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  240 in total

1.  Diet and cancer prevention: Contributions from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study.

Authors:  Carlos A Gonzalez; Elio Riboli
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice.

Authors:  D K Rex; E Y Rahmani; J H Haseman; G T Lemmel; S Kaster; J S Buckley
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 randomized phase III trial after a median follow-up of 11 years.

Authors:  Rolf Sauer; Torsten Liersch; Susanne Merkel; Rainer Fietkau; Werner Hohenberger; Clemens Hess; Heinz Becker; Hans-Rudolf Raab; Marie-Therese Villanueva; Helmut Witzigmann; Christian Wittekind; Tim Beissbarth; Claus Rödel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Detection of hypermethylated vimentin in urine of patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin P Song; Surbhi Jain; Selena Y Lin; Quan Chen; Timothy M Block; Wei Song; Dean E Brenner; Ying-Hsiu Su
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 5.568

5.  The clinical benefit of bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer is independent of K-ras mutation status: analysis of a phase III study of bevacizumab with chemotherapy in previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Herbert I Hurwitz; Jing Yi; William Ince; William F Novotny; Oliver Rosen
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2009-01-14

6.  Circulating tumor cells in colorectal cancer: correlation with clinical and pathological variables.

Authors:  J Sastre; M L Maestro; J Puente; S Veganzones; R Alfonso; S Rafael; J A García-Saenz; M Vidaurreta; M Martín; M Arroyo; M T Sanz-Casla; E Díaz-Rubio
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Herbert Hurwitz; Louis Fehrenbacher; William Novotny; Thomas Cartwright; John Hainsworth; William Heim; Jordan Berlin; Ari Baron; Susan Griffing; Eric Holmgren; Napoleone Ferrara; Gwen Fyfe; Beth Rogers; Robert Ross; Fairooz Kabbinavar
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  CT colonography of colorectal polyps: a metaanalysis.

Authors:  Jacob Sosna; Martina M Morrin; Jonathan B Kruskal; Philip T Lavin; Max P Rosen; Vassilios Raptopoulos
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 9.  Blood markers for early detection of colorectal cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sabrina Hundt; Ulrike Haug; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  What would make getting colorectal cancer screening easier? Perspectives from screeners and nonscreeners.

Authors:  Gilda G Medina; Amy McQueen; Anthony J Greisinger; L Kay Bartholomew; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 2.260

View more
  106 in total

Review 1.  Fecal DNA testing for colorectal cancer screening: Molecular targets and perspectives.

Authors:  Amaninder Dhaliwal; Panagiotis J Vlachostergios; Katerina G Oikonomou; Yitzchak Moshenyat
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-10-15

2.  Meta-analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in identification of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hongyuan Jia; Xuelei Ma; Yang Zhao; Jingyi Zhao; Rongjun Liu; Zihang Chen; Jinna Chen; Jingwen Huang; Yanyan Li; Jing Zhang; Feng Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15

3.  Yogurt consumption and colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Samara B Rifkin; Francis M Giardiello; Xiangzhu Zhu; Linda M Hylind; Reid M Ness; Julia L Drewes; Harvey J Murff; Emma H Spence; Walter E Smalley; Joell J Gills; Gerard E Mullin; David Kafonek; Louis La Luna; Wei Zheng; Cynthia L Sears; Martha J Shrubsole
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 3.718

4.  Comprehensive analysis of differentially expressed lncRNAs as diagnostic and prognostic markers for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Xunlei Zhang; Xingsong Zhang; Lili Shen; Li Song; Jindong Wu; Guangxin Cao; Xin Chen; Bin Zhu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Angiopoietin and vascular endothelial growth factor expression in colorectal disease models.

Authors:  Wei-Xin Liu; Shou-Zhi Gu; Shen Zhang; Yi Ren; Li-Xuan Sang; Cong Dai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  AQP8 inhibits colorectal cancer growth and metastasis by down-regulating PI3K/AKT signaling and PCDH7 expression.

Authors:  De Qing Wu; Zi Feng Yang; Ke Jian Wang; Xing Yu Feng; Ze Jian Lv; Yong Li; Zhi Xiang Jian
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 6.166

7.  Expression of the apoptosis repressor with caspase recruitment domain (ARC) in liver metastasis of colorectal cancer and its correlation with DNA mismatch repair proteins and p53.

Authors:  Csaba Tóth; Jeannine Meinrath; Esther Herpel; Jutta Derix; Jochen Fries; Reinhard Buettner; Peter Schirmacher; Sebastian Heikaus
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  The bacterial genotoxin colibactin promotes colon tumor growth by modifying the tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Guillaume Dalmasso; Antony Cougnoux; Julien Delmas; Arlette Darfeuille-Michaud; Richard Bonnet
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2014

9.  Promoter hypermethylation and downregulation of the FAS gene may be involved in colorectal carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Mehdi Manoochehri; Nasim Borhani; Ashraf Karbasi; Ameneh Koochaki; Bahram Kazemi
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Metformin and aspirin treatment could lead to an improved survival rate for Type 2 diabetic patients with stage II and III colorectal adenocarcinoma relative to non-diabetic patients.

Authors:  Ariella De Monte; Davide Brunetti; Luigi Cattin; Francesca Lavanda; Erica Naibo; Maria Malagoli; Giorgio Stanta; Serena Bonin
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-01-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.