Literature DB >> 15931174

SUMO-modified PCNA recruits Srs2 to prevent recombination during S phase.

Boris Pfander1, George-Lucian Moldovan, Meik Sacher, Carsten Hoege, Stefan Jentsch.   

Abstract

Damaged DNA, if not repaired before replication, can lead to replication fork stalling and genomic instability; however, cells can switch to different damage bypass modes that permit replication across lesions. Two main bypasses are controlled by ubiquitin modification of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), a homotrimeric DNA-encircling protein that functions as a polymerase processivity factor and regulator of replication-linked functions. Upon DNA damage, PCNA is modified at the conserved lysine residue 164 by either mono-ubiquitin or a lysine-63-linked multi-ubiquitin chain, which induce error-prone or error-free replication bypasses of the lesions. In S phase, even in the absence of exogenous DNA damage, yeast PCNA can be alternatively modified by the small ubiquitin-related modifier protein SUMO; however the consequences of this remain controversial. Here we show by genetic analysis that SUMO-modified PCNA functionally cooperates with Srs2, a helicase that blocks recombinational repair by disrupting Rad51 nucleoprotein filaments. Moreover, Srs2 displays a preference for interacting directly with the SUMO-modified form of PCNA, owing to a specific binding site in its carboxy-terminal tail. Our finding suggests a model in which SUMO-modified PCNA recruits Srs2 in S phase in order to prevent unwanted recombination events of replicating chromosomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15931174     DOI: 10.1038/nature03665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  304 in total

1.  Dual recruitment of Cdc48 (p97)-Ufd1-Npl4 ubiquitin-selective segregase by small ubiquitin-like modifier protein (SUMO) and ubiquitin in SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase-mediated genome stability functions.

Authors:  Minghua Nie; Aaron Aslanian; John Prudden; Johanna Heideker; Ajay A Vashisht; James A Wohlschlegel; John R Yates; Michael N Boddy
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Regulation of DNA cross-link repair by the Fanconi anemia/BRCA pathway.

Authors:  Hyungjin Kim; Alan D D'Andrea
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Synaptonemal complex formation and meiotic checkpoint signaling are linked to the lateral element protein Red1.

Authors:  Christian S Eichinger; Stefan Jentsch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Ubiquitin signalling in DNA replication and repair.

Authors:  Helle D Ulrich; Helen Walden
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 94.444

5.  The mutational spectrum of non-CpG DNA varies with CpG content.

Authors:  Jean-Claude Walser; Anthony V Furano
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  A variant of the breast cancer type 2 susceptibility protein (BRC) repeat is essential for the RECQL5 helicase to interact with RAD51 recombinase for genome stabilization.

Authors:  M Nurul Islam; Nicolas Paquet; David Fox; Eloise Dray; Xiao-Feng Zheng; Hannah Klein; Patrick Sung; Weidong Wang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  The preference for error-free or error-prone postreplication repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae exposed to low-dose methyl methanesulfonate is cell cycle dependent.

Authors:  Dongqing Huang; Brian D Piening; Amanda G Paulovich
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  UvrD303, a hyperhelicase mutant that antagonizes RecA-dependent SOS expression by a mechanism that depends on its C terminus.

Authors:  Richard C Centore; Michael C Leeson; Steven J Sandler
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Putative antirecombinase Srs2 DNA helicase promotes noncrossover homologous recombination avoiding loss of heterozygosity.

Authors:  Tohru Miura; Takehiko Shibata; Kohji Kusano
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Defects in DNA lesion bypass lead to spontaneous chromosomal rearrangements and increased cell death.

Authors:  Kristina H Schmidt; Emilie B Viebranz; Lorena B Harris; Hamed Mirzaei-Souderjani; Salahuddin Syed; Robin Medicus
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2009-12-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.