Literature DB >> 25060101

Shared genetic pathways contribute to the tolerance of endogenous and low-dose exogenous DNA damage in yeast.

Kevin Lehner1, Sue Jinks-Robertson2.   

Abstract

DNA damage that escapes repair and blocks replicative DNA polymerases is tolerated by bypass mechanisms that fall into two general categories: error-free template switching and error-prone translesion synthesis. Prior studies of DNA damage responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae have demonstrated that repair mechanisms are critical for survival when a single, high dose of DNA damage is delivered, while bypass/tolerance mechanisms are more important for survival when the damage level is low and continuous (acute and chronic damage, respectively). In the current study, epistatic interactions between DNA-damage tolerance genes were examined and compared when haploid yeast cells were exposed to either chronic ultraviolet light or chronic methyl methanesulfonate. Results demonstrate that genes assigned to error-free and error-prone bypass pathways similarly promote survival in the presence of each type of chronic damage. In addition to using defined sources of chronic damage, rates of spontaneous mutations generated by the Pol ζ translesion synthesis DNA polymerase (complex insertions in a frameshift-reversion assay) were used to infer epistatic interactions between the same genes. Similar epistatic interactions were observed in analyses of spontaneous mutation rates, suggesting that chronic DNA-damage responses accurately reflect those used to tolerate spontaneous lesions. These results have important implications when considering what constitutes a safe and acceptable level of exogenous DNA damage.
Copyright © 2014 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage; lesion bypass; template switch; translesion synthesis; yeast

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25060101      PMCID: PMC4196610          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.114.168617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  47 in total

1.  Two RING finger proteins mediate cooperation between ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes in DNA repair.

Authors:  H D Ulrich; S Jentsch
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-07-03       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  The Srs2 helicase prevents recombination by disrupting Rad51 nucleoprotein filaments.

Authors:  Xavier Veaute; Josette Jeusset; Christine Soustelle; Stephen C Kowalczykowski; Eric Le Cam; Francis Fabre
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO.

Authors:  Carsten Hoege; Boris Pfander; George-Lucian Moldovan; George Pyrowolakis; Stefan Jentsch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-09-12       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Genetic requirements for spontaneous and transcription-stimulated mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Jennifer A Freedman; Sue Jinks-Robertson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  A second set of loxP marker cassettes for Cre-mediated multiple gene knockouts in budding yeast.

Authors:  U Gueldener; J Heinisch; G J Koehler; D Voss; J H Hegemann
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Dissection of the functions of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD6 postreplicative repair group in mutagenesis and UV sensitivity.

Authors:  P Cejka; V Vondrejs; Z Storchová
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Control of spontaneous and damage-induced mutagenesis by SUMO and ubiquitin conjugation.

Authors:  Philipp Stelter; Helle D Ulrich
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  DNA helicase Srs2 disrupts the Rad51 presynaptic filament.

Authors:  Lumir Krejci; Stephen Van Komen; Ying Li; Jana Villemain; Mothe Sreedhar Reddy; Hannah Klein; Thomas Ellenberger; Patrick Sung
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Requirement of RAD52 group genes for postreplication repair of UV-damaged DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Venkateswarlu Gangavarapu; Satya Prakash; Louise Prakash
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Yeast MPH1 gene functions in an error-free DNA damage bypass pathway that requires genes from Homologous recombination, but not from postreplicative repair.

Authors:  K Anke Schürer; Christian Rudolph; Helle D Ulrich; Wilfried Kramer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  4 in total

1.  DNA Damage Tolerance Pathway Choice Through Uls1 Modulation of Srs2 SUMOylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Karol Kramarz; Seweryn Mucha; Ireneusz Litwin; Anna Barg-Wojas; Robert Wysocki; Dorota Dziadkowiec
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Effects of chain length and geometry on the activation of DNA damage bypass by polyubiquitylated PCNA.

Authors:  Tomio S Takahashi; Hans-Peter Wollscheid; Jonathan Lowther; Helle D Ulrich
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Regulation of HLTF-mediated PCNA polyubiquitination by RFC and PCNA monoubiquitination levels determines choice of damage tolerance pathway.

Authors:  Yuji Masuda; Satoshi Mitsuyuki; Rie Kanao; Asami Hishiki; Hiroshi Hashimoto; Chikahide Masutani
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Fanconi Anaemia-Like Mph1 Helicase Backs up Rad54 and Rad5 to Circumvent Replication Stress-Driven Chromosome Bridges.

Authors:  Jonay García-Luis; Félix Machín
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 4.096

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.