Literature DB >> 24366029

Causes and consequences of replication stress.

Michelle K Zeman1, Karlene A Cimprich1.   

Abstract

Replication stress is a complex phenomenon that has serious implications for genome stability, cell survival and human disease. Generation of aberrant replication fork structures containing single-stranded DNA activates the replication stress response, primarily mediated by the kinase ATR (ATM- and Rad3-related). Along with its downstream effectors, ATR stabilizes and helps to restart stalled replication forks, avoiding the generation of DNA damage and genome instability. Understanding this response may be key to diagnosing and treating human diseases caused by defective responses to replication stress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24366029      PMCID: PMC4354890          DOI: 10.1038/ncb2897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Cell Biol        ISSN: 1465-7392            Impact factor:   28.824


  139 in total

1.  Cotranscriptionally formed DNA:RNA hybrids mediate transcription elongation impairment and transcription-associated recombination.

Authors:  Pablo Huertas; Andrés Aguilera
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 2.  DNA damage sensing by the ATM and ATR kinases.

Authors:  Alexandre Maréchal; Lee Zou
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 3.  Transcription-replication encounters, consequences and genomic instability.

Authors:  Anne Helmrich; Monica Ballarino; Evgeny Nudler; Laszlo Tora
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 15.369

Review 4.  ATR signalling: more than meeting at the fork.

Authors:  Edward A Nam; David Cortez
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.857

5.  Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint.

Authors:  J A Tercero; J F Diffley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Hydroxyurea-stalled replication forks become progressively inactivated and require two different RAD51-mediated pathways for restart and repair.

Authors:  Eva Petermann; Manuel Luís Orta; Natalia Issaeva; Niklas Schultz; Thomas Helleday
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  RNase H2-initiated ribonucleotide excision repair.

Authors:  Justin L Sparks; Hyongi Chon; Susana M Cerritelli; Thomas A Kunkel; Erik Johansson; Robert J Crouch; Peter M Burgers
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 8.  The balancing act of DNA repeat expansions.

Authors:  Jane C Kim; Sergei M Mirkin
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 5.578

9.  The Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 (MRN) complex has a specific role in the activation of Chk1 in response to stalled replication forks.

Authors:  Joon Lee; William G Dunphy
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 4.138

10.  RNase H and postreplication repair protect cells from ribonucleotides incorporated in DNA.

Authors:  Federico Lazzaro; Daniele Novarina; Flavio Amara; Danielle L Watt; Jana E Stone; Vincenzo Costanzo; Peter M Burgers; Thomas A Kunkel; Paolo Plevani; Marco Muzi-Falconi
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 17.970

View more
  756 in total

1.  TopBP1-mediated DNA processing during mitosis.

Authors:  Irene Gallina; Signe Korbo Christiansen; Rune Troelsgaard Pedersen; Michael Lisby; Vibe H Oestergaard
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 2.  DNA replication stress: from molecular mechanisms to human disease.

Authors:  Sergio Muñoz; Juan Méndez
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  SLFN11 promotes stalled fork degradation that underlies the phenotype in Fanconi anemia cells.

Authors:  Yusuke Okamoto; Masako Abe; Anfeng Mu; Yasuko Tempaku; Colette B Rogers; Ayako L Mochizuki; Yoko Katsuki; Masato T Kanemaki; Akifumi Takaori-Kondo; Alexandra Sobeck; Anja-Katrin Bielinsky; Minoru Takata
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  ATR Plays a Direct Antiapoptotic Role at Mitochondria, which Is Regulated by Prolyl Isomerase Pin1.

Authors:  Benjamin A Hilton; Zhengke Li; Phillip R Musich; Hui Wang; Brian M Cartwright; Moises Serrano; Xiao Zhen Zhou; Kun Ping Lu; Yue Zou
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  SLFN11 Blocks Stressed Replication Forks Independently of ATR.

Authors:  Junko Murai; Sai-Wen Tang; Elisabetta Leo; Simone A Baechler; Christophe E Redon; Hongliang Zhang; Muthana Al Abo; Vinodh N Rajapakse; Eijiro Nakamura; Lisa M Miller Jenkins; Mirit I Aladjem; Yves Pommier
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Ca2+-Stimulated AMPK-Dependent Phosphorylation of Exo1 Protects Stressed Replication Forks from Aberrant Resection.

Authors:  Shan Li; Zeno Lavagnino; Delphine Lemacon; Lingzhen Kong; Alessandro Ustione; Xuewen Ng; Yuanya Zhang; Yingchun Wang; Bin Zheng; Helen Piwnica-Worms; Alessandro Vindigni; David W Piston; Zhongsheng You
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  Chromatin immunoprecipitation to detect DNA replication and repair factors.

Authors:  Mariana C Gadaleta; Osamu Iwasaki; Chiaki Noguchi; Ken-Ichi Noma; Eishi Noguchi
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2015

8.  Human CST abundance determines recovery from diverse forms of DNA damage and replication stress.

Authors:  Feng Wang; Jason Stewart; Carolyn M Price
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.534

9.  Zika Virus Infection Induces DNA Damage Response in Human Neural Progenitors That Enhances Viral Replication.

Authors:  Christy Hammack; Sarah C Ogden; Joseph C Madden; Angelica Medina; Chongchong Xu; Ernest Phillips; Yuna Son; Allaura Cone; Serena Giovinazzi; Ruth A Didier; David M Gilbert; Hongjun Song; Guoli Ming; Zhexing Wen; Margo A Brinton; Akash Gunjan; Hengli Tang
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  Hair follicle stem cell replication stress drives IFI16/STING-dependent inflammation in hidradenitis suppurativa.

Authors:  Cindy Orvain; Yea-Lih Lin; Francette Jean-Louis; Hakim Hocini; Barbara Hersant; Yamina Bennasser; Nicolas Ortonne; Claire Hotz; Pierre Wolkenstein; Michele Boniotto; Pascaline Tisserand; Cécile Lefebvre; Jean-Daniel Lelièvre; Monsef Benkirane; Philippe Pasero; Yves Lévy; Sophie Hüe
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 14.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.