Literature DB >> 27017623

DNA Replication Stress Phosphoproteome Profiles Reveal Novel Functional Phosphorylation Sites on Xrs2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Dongqing Huang1, Brian D Piening1, Jacob J Kennedy1, Chenwei Lin1, Corey W Jones-Weinert1, Ping Yan1, Amanda G Paulovich2.   

Abstract

In response to replication stress, a phospho-signaling cascade is activated and required for coordination of DNA repair and replication of damaged templates (intra-S-phase checkpoint) . How phospho-signaling coordinates the DNA replication stress response is largely unknown. We employed state-of-the-art liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) approaches to generate high-coverage and quantitative proteomic and phospho-proteomic profiles during replication stress in yeast, induced by continuous exposure to the DNA alkylating agent methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) . We identified 32,057 unique peptides representing the products of 4296 genes and 22,061 unique phosphopeptides representing the products of 3183 genes. A total of 542 phosphopeptides (mapping to 339 genes) demonstrated an abundance change of greater than or equal to twofold in response to MMS. The screen enabled detection of nearly all of the proteins known to be involved in the DNA damage response, as well as many novel MMS-induced phosphorylations. We assessed the functional importance of a subset of key phosphosites by engineering a panel of phosphosite mutants in which an amino acid substitution prevents phosphorylation. In total, we successfully mutated 15 MMS-responsive phosphorylation sites in seven representative genes including APN1 (base excision repair); CTF4 and TOF1 (checkpoint and sister-chromatid cohesion); MPH1 (resolution of homologous recombination intermediates); RAD50 and XRS2 (MRX complex); and RAD18 (PRR). All of these phosphorylation site mutants exhibited MMS sensitivity, indicating an important role in protecting cells from DNA damage. In particular, we identified MMS-induced phosphorylation sites on Xrs2 that are required for MMS resistance in the absence of the MRX activator, Sae2, and that affect telomere maintenance.
Copyright © 2016 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage checkpoint; DNA damage response; genetic interaction; homologous recombination; mass spectrometry; methyl methanesulfonate; phosphorylation; telomere

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27017623      PMCID: PMC4858785          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.115.185231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  83 in total

Review 1.  Protein kinases--the major drug targets of the twenty-first century?

Authors:  Philip Cohen
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Role of DNA damage-induced replication checkpoint in promoting lesion bypass by translesion synthesis in yeast.

Authors:  Vincent Pagès; Sergio R Santa Maria; Louise Prakash; Satya Prakash
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Sae2 promotes DNA damage resistance by removing the Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 complex from DNA and attenuating Rad53 signaling.

Authors:  Huan Chen; Roberto A Donnianni; Naofumi Handa; Sarah K Deng; Julyun Oh; Leonid A Timashev; Stephen C Kowalczykowski; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  An overview of Cdk1-controlled targets and processes.

Authors:  Jorrit M Enserink; Richard D Kolodner
Journal:  Cell Div       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 5.130

5.  The preference for error-free or error-prone postreplication repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae exposed to low-dose methyl methanesulfonate is cell cycle dependent.

Authors:  Dongqing Huang; Brian D Piening; Amanda G Paulovich
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 6.  Causes and consequences of replication stress.

Authors:  Michelle K Zeman; Karlene A Cimprich
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 7.  The clinical manifestation of a defective response to DNA double-strand breaks as exemplified by Nijmegen breakage syndrome.

Authors:  I Demuth; M Digweed
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2007-12-10       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  The budding yeast Rad9 checkpoint protein is subjected to Mec1/Tel1-dependent hyperphosphorylation and interacts with Rad53 after DNA damage.

Authors:  J E Vialard; C S Gilbert; C M Green; N F Lowndes
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  A perturbed ubiquitin landscape distinguishes between ubiquitin in trafficking and in proteolysis.

Authors:  Inbal Ziv; Yulia Matiuhin; Donald S Kirkpatrick; Zoi Erpapazoglou; Sebastien Leon; Marina Pantazopoulou; Woong Kim; Steven P Gygi; Rosine Haguenauer-Tsapis; Noa Reis; Michael H Glickman; Oded Kleifeld
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 5.911

10.  Chemical genetics reveals a specific requirement for Cdk2 activity in the DNA damage response and identifies Nbs1 as a Cdk2 substrate in human cells.

Authors:  Lara Wohlbold; Karl A Merrick; Saurav De; Ramon Amat; Jun Hyun Kim; Stéphane Larochelle; Jasmina J Allen; Chao Zhang; Kevan M Shokat; John H J Petrini; Robert P Fisher
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.