Literature DB >> 16118434

Synthetic genetic array analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Amy Hin Yan Tong, Charles Boone.   

Abstract

Synthetic lethality occurs when the combination of two mutations leads to an inviable organism. Screens for synthetic lethal genetic interactions have been used extensively to identify genes whose products buffer one another or impinge on the same essential pathway. For the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we developed a method termed Synthetic Genetic Array (SGA) analysis, which offers an efficient approach for the systematic construction of double mutants and enables a global analysis of synthetic lethal genetic interactions. In a typical SGA screen, a query mutation is crossed to an ordered array of approx 5000 viable gene deletion mutants (representing approximately 80% of all yeast genes) such that meiotic progeny harboring both mutations can be scored for fitness defects. This array-based approach automates yeast genetic analysis in general and can be easily adapted for a number of different screens, including genetic suppression, plasmid shuffling, dosage lethality, or suppression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16118434     DOI: 10.1385/1-59259-958-3:171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  279 in total

1.  Roles for Gcn5 in promoting nucleosome assembly and maintaining genome integrity.

Authors:  Rebecca J Burgess; Zhiguo Zhang
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Yet1p and Yet3p, the yeast homologs of BAP29 and BAP31, interact with the endoplasmic reticulum translocation apparatus and are required for inositol prototrophy.

Authors:  Joshua D Wilson; Charles Barlowe
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  The endosomal trafficking factors CORVET and ESCRT suppress plasma membrane residence of the renal outer medullary potassium channel (ROMK).

Authors:  Timothy D Mackie; Bo-Young Kim; Arohan R Subramanya; Daniel J Bain; Allyson F O'Donnell; Paul A Welling; Jeffrey L Brodsky
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  The regulatory utilization of genetic redundancy through responsive backup circuits.

Authors:  Ran Kafri; Melissa Levy; Yitzhak Pilpel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Why Dom34 stimulates growth of cells with defects of 40S ribosomal subunit biosynthesis.

Authors:  Arpita Bhattacharya; Kerri B McIntosh; Ian M Willis; Jonathan R Warner
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Buffering of deoxyribonucleotide pool homeostasis by threonine metabolism.

Authors:  John L Hartman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-07-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Stringent mating-type-regulated auxotrophy increases the accuracy of systematic genetic interaction screens with Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant arrays.

Authors:  Indira Singh; Rebecca Pass; Sine Ozmen Togay; John W Rodgers; John L Hartman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The preference for error-free or error-prone postreplication repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae exposed to low-dose methyl methanesulfonate is cell cycle dependent.

Authors:  Dongqing Huang; Brian D Piening; Amanda G Paulovich
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 9.  Budding yeast for budding geneticists: a primer on the Saccharomyces cerevisiae model system.

Authors:  Andrea A Duina; Mary E Miller; Jill B Keeney
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Altered dosage and mislocalization of histone H3 and Cse4p lead to chromosome loss in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Wei-Chun Au; Matthew J Crisp; Steven Z DeLuca; Oliver J Rando; Munira A Basrai
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.