Literature DB >> 23365997

A pilot study on effects of 4×1 high-definition tDCS on motor cortex excitability.

Egas M Caparelli-Daquer1, Trelawny J Zimmermann, Eric Mooshagian, Lucas C Parra, Justin K Rice, Abhishek Datta, Marom Bikson, Eric M Wassermann.   

Abstract

High-Definition transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HD-tDCS) using specialized small electrodes has been proposed as a focal, non-invasive neuromodulatory technique. Here we provide the first evidence of a change in cortical excitability after HD-tDCS of the motor cortex, using TMS motor evoked potential (MEP) as the measure of excitability. Stimulation for 20 minutes at 1 mA with an anode centered over the hand area of the motor cortex and four surrounding return electrodes (anodal 4×1 montage) produced a significant increase in MEP amplitude and variability after stimulation, compared to sham stimulation. Stimulation was well tolerated by all subjects with adverse effects limited to transient sensation under the electrodes. A high-resolution computational model confirmed predictions of increased focality using the 4×1 HD tDCS montage compared to conventional tDCS. Simulations also indicated that variability in placement of the center electrode relative to the location of the target (central sulcus) could account for increasing variability. These results provide support for the careful use of this technique where focal tDCS is desired.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23365997      PMCID: PMC4912047          DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc        ISSN: 1557-170X


  22 in total

1.  Transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex during fMRI.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Rafael Polania; Carsten Schmidt-Samoa; Peter Dechent; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Electrode montages for tDCS and weak transcranial electrical stimulation: role of "return" electrode's position and size.

Authors:  M Bikson; Abhishek Datta; Asif Rahman; Jen Scaturro
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Transcranial DC stimulation in fibromyalgia: optimized cortical target supported by high-resolution computational models.

Authors:  Mariana E Mendonca; Marcus B Santana; Abrahão F Baptista; Abhishek Datta; Marom Bikson; Felipe Fregni; Cintia P Araujo
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 4.  Transcranial direct current stimulation as a therapeutic tool for the treatment of major depression: insights from past and recent clinical studies.

Authors:  Destiny N Murphy; Paulo Boggio; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychiatry       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.741

5.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in a realistic head model.

Authors:  Rosalind J Sadleir; Tracy D Vannorsdall; David J Schretlen; Barry Gordon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Transcranial current stimulation focality using disc and ring electrode configurations: FEM analysis.

Authors:  Abhishek Datta; Maged Elwassif; Fortunato Battaglia; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Electrodes for high-definition transcutaneous DC stimulation for applications in drug delivery and electrotherapy, including tDCS.

Authors:  Preet Minhas; Varun Bansal; Jinal Patel; Johnson S Ho; Julian Diaz; Abhishek Datta; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.390

8.  Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans.

Authors:  M A Nitsche; W Paulus
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-11-27       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation for decreasing post-ERCP pain: a randomized, sham-controlled, pilot study.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Borckardt; Joseph Romagnuolo; Scott T Reeves; Alok Madan; Heather Frohman; Will Beam; Mark S George
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 10.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: a noninvasive tool to facilitate stroke recovery.

Authors:  Gottfried Schlaug; Vijay Renga
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.166

View more
  33 in total

1.  Modulating conscious movement intention by noninvasive brain stimulation and the underlying neural mechanisms.

Authors:  Zachary H Douglas; Brian Maniscalco; Mark Hallett; Eric M Wassermann; Biyu J He
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Extended Multiple-Field High-Definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) is well tolerated and safe in healthy adults.

Authors:  Christopher A Turski; Alanna Kessler-Jones; Clara Chow; Bruce Hermann; David Hsu; Jana Jones; Susanne K Seeger; Rick Chappell; Melanie Boly; Chrysanthy Ikonomidou
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.406

3.  Intention Modulates the Effect of Punishment Threat in Norm Enforcement via the Lateral Orbitofrontal Cortex.

Authors:  Yuan Zhang; Hongbo Yu; Yunlu Yin; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Incomplete evidence that increasing current intensity of tDCS boosts outcomes.

Authors:  Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Paola Marangolo; Benjamin M Hampstead; Sven Bestmann; Elisabeth Galletta; Helena Knotkova; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 5.  Classification of methods in transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) and evolving strategy from historical approaches to contemporary innovations.

Authors:  Berkan Guleyupoglu; Pedro Schestatsky; Dylan Edwards; Felipe Fregni; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Automated MRI segmentation for individualized modeling of current flow in the human head.

Authors:  Yu Huang; Jacek P Dmochowski; Yuzhuo Su; Abhishek Datta; Christopher Rorden; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Working memory capacity differentially influences responses to tDCS and HD-tDCS in a retro-cue task.

Authors:  Filiz Gözenman; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Non-Invasive Electrical Brain Stimulation Montages for Modulation of Human Motor Function.

Authors:  Marco Curado; Brita Fritsch; Janine Reis
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  A Halo-Shaped Electrode Holder System for HD-tDCS is a Practical and Flexible Alternative to the EEG Cap 4×1-Ring Montage.

Authors:  E M Caparelli-Dáquer; A F Valente; F Nigri; D J Edwards; A H Medeiros
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 10.  Electrifying the motor engram: effects of tDCS on motor learning and control.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.