Literature DB >> 21497140

Transcranial DC stimulation in fibromyalgia: optimized cortical target supported by high-resolution computational models.

Mariana E Mendonca1, Marcus B Santana, Abrahão F Baptista, Abhishek Datta, Marom Bikson, Felipe Fregni, Cintia P Araujo.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In this study we aimed to determine current distribution and short-term analgesic effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in fibromyalgia using different electrode montages. For each electrode montage, clinical effects were correlated with predictions of induced cortical current flow using magnetic resonance imaging-derived finite element method head model. Thirty patients were randomized into 5 groups (Cathodal-M1 [primary motor cortex], Cathodal-SO [supra-orbital area], Anodal-M1, Anodal-SO, and Sham) to receive tDCS application (2 mA, 20 minutes) using an extracephalic montage. Pain was measured using a visual numerical scale (VNS), pressure pain threshold (PPT), and a body diagram (BD) evaluating pain area. There was significant pain reduction in cathodal-SO and anodal-SO groups indexed by VNS. For PPT there was a trend for a similar effect in anodal-SO group. Computer simulation indicated that the M1-extracephalic montage produced dominantly temporo-parietal current flow, consistent with lack of clinical effects with this montage. Conversely, the SO-extracephalic montage produced current flow across anterior prefrontal structures, thus supporting the observed analgesic effects. Our clinical and modeling findings suggest that electrode montage, considering both electrodes, is critical for the clinical effects of M1-tDCS as electric current needs to be induced in areas associated with the pain matrix. These results should be taken into consideration for the design of pain tDCS studies. PERSPECTIVE: Results in this article support that electrode montage is a critical factor to consider for the clinical application of tDCS for pain control, as there is an important correlation between the location of induced electrical current and tDCS-induced analgesic effects.
Copyright © 2011 American Pain Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21497140     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  48 in total

1.  No Effect of 2 mA Anodal tDCS Over the M1 on Performance and Practice Effect on Grooved Pegboard Test and Trail Making Test B

Authors:  Asbjørn J Fagerlund; Janita L Freili; Therese L Danielsen; Per M Aslaksen
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2015-08-31

2.  Exogenously induced brain activation regulates neuronal activity by top-down modulation: conceptualized model for electrical brain stimulation.

Authors:  Lauren Naomi Spezia Adachi; Alexandre Silva Quevedo; Andressa de Souza; Vanessa Leal Scarabelot; Joanna Ripoll Rozisky; Carla de Oliveira; Paulo Ricardo Marques Filho; Liciane Fernandes Medeiros; Felipe Fregni; Wolnei Caumo; Iraci L S Torres
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Transcranial electrical stimulation nomenclature.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Devin Adair; Greg Kronberg; William J Tyler; Andrea Antal; Abhishek Datta; Bernhard A Sabel; Michael A Nitsche; Colleen Loo; Dylan Edwards; Hamed Ekhtiari; Helena Knotkova; Adam J Woods; Benjamin M Hampstead; Bashar W Badran; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 4.  Incomplete evidence that increasing current intensity of tDCS boosts outcomes.

Authors:  Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Paola Marangolo; Benjamin M Hampstead; Sven Bestmann; Elisabeth Galletta; Helena Knotkova; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Pain Distress Tolerance: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Timothy Y Mariano; Mascha van't Wout; Benjamin L Jacobson; Sarah L Garnaat; Jason L Kirschner; Steven A Rasmussen; Benjamin D Greenberg
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.750

6.  Clinician accessible tools for GUI computational models of transcranial electrical stimulation: BONSAI and SPHERES.

Authors:  Dennis Q Truong; Mathias Hüber; Xihe Xie; Abhishek Datta; Asif Rahman; Lucas C Parra; Jacek P Dmochowski; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  Automated MRI segmentation for individualized modeling of current flow in the human head.

Authors:  Yu Huang; Jacek P Dmochowski; Yuzhuo Su; Abhishek Datta; Christopher Rorden; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  A pilot study on effects of 4×1 high-definition tDCS on motor cortex excitability.

Authors:  Egas M Caparelli-Daquer; Trelawny J Zimmermann; Eric Mooshagian; Lucas C Parra; Justin K Rice; Abhishek Datta; Marom Bikson; Eric M Wassermann
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2012

9.  Differential frontal involvement in shifts of internal and perceptual attention.

Authors:  Ryan T Tanoue; Kevin T Jones; Dwight J Peterson; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 8.955

10.  Hemodynamic responses in rat brain during transcranial direct current stimulation: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study.

Authors:  Chang-Hee Han; Hyuna Song; Yong-Guk Kang; Beop-Min Kim; Chang-Hwan Im
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 3.732

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.