Literature DB >> 21211569

Transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex during fMRI.

Andrea Antal1, Rafael Polania, Carsten Schmidt-Samoa, Peter Dechent, Walter Paulus.   

Abstract

Measurements of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) have shown that anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulations (tDCS) have facilitatory or inhibitory effects on corticospinal excitability in the stimulated area of the primary motor cortex (M1). Here, we investigated the online effects of short periods of anodal and cathodal tDCS on human brain activity of healthy subjects and associated hemodynamics by concurrent blood-oxygenation-level-dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) at 3T. Using a block design, 20s periods of tDCS at 1 mA intensity over the left M1 altered with 20s periods without tDCS. In different fMRI runs, the effect of anodal or cathodal tDCS was assessed at rest or during finger tapping. A control experiment was also performed, in which the electrodes were placed over the left and right occipito-temporo-parietal junction. Neither anodal nor cathodal tDCS over the M1 for 20s stimulation duration induced a detectable BOLD signal change. However, in comparison to a voluntary finger tapping task without stimulation, anodal tDCS during finger tapping resulted in a decrease in the BOLD response in the supplementary motor area (SMA). Cathodal stimulation did not result in significant change in BOLD response in the SMA, however, a tendency toward decreased activity could be seen. In the control experiment neither cathodal nor anodal stimulation resulted in a significant change of BOLD signal during finger tapping in any brain area including SMA, PM, and M1. These findings demonstrate that the well-known polarity-dependent shifts in corticospinal excitability that have previously been demonstrated using measurements of MEPs after M1 stimulation are not paralleled by analogous changes in regional BOLD signal. This difference implies that the BOLD signal and measurements of MEPs probe diverse physiological mechanisms. The MEP amplitude reflects changes in transsynaptic excitability of large pyramidal neurons while the BOLD signal is a measure of net synaptic activity of all cortical neurons.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21211569     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  88 in total

1.  Transcranial static magnetic field stimulation in man: making things as simple as possible?

Authors:  Walter Paulus
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Behavioural and neurofunctional impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on somatosensory learning.

Authors:  Raphael Hilgenstock; Thomas Weiss; Ralph Huonker; Otto W Witte
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Transcranial electrical stimulation modifies the neuronal response to psychosocial stress exposure.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Thomas Fischer; Catarina Saiote; Robert Miller; Leila Chaieb; Danny J J Wang; Franziska Plessow; Walter Paulus; Clemens Kirschbaum
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Functional near-infrared spectroscopy maps cortical plasticity underlying altered motor performance induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Bilal Khan; Timea Hodics; Nathan Hervey; George Kondraske; Ann M Stowe; George Alexandrakis
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Transcranial direct-current stimulation modulates offline visual oscillatory activity: A magnetoencephalography study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Timothy J McDermott; Mackenzie S Mills; Nathan M Coolidge; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  Transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates response inhibition through dynamic modulation of the fronto-basal ganglia network.

Authors:  Marco Sandrini; Benjamin Xu; Rita Volochayev; Oluwole Awosika; Wen-Tung Wang; John A Butman; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  Timing-dependent priming effects of tDCS on ankle motor skill learning.

Authors:  Aishwarya Sriraman; Tatsuya Oishi; Sangeetha Madhavan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Imaging artifacts induced by electrical stimulation during conventional fMRI of the brain.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Marom Bikson; Abhishek Datta; Belen Lafon; Peter Dechent; Lucas C Parra; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation over primary motor cortex (anode) and contralateral supraorbital area (cathode) on clinical pain severity and mobility performance in persons with knee osteoarthritis: An experimenter- and participant-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled pilot clinical study.

Authors:  Hyochol Ahn; Adam J Woods; Mark E Kunik; Abhishek Bhattacharjee; Zhiguo Chen; Eunyoung Choi; Roger B Fillingim
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 8.955

10.  The use of magnetic resonance spectroscopy as a tool for the measurement of bi-hemispheric transcranial electric stimulation effects on primary motor cortex metabolism.

Authors:  Sara Tremblay; Vincent Beaulé; Sébastien Proulx; Louis-Philippe Lafleur; Julien Doyon; Małgorzata Marjańska; Hugo Théoret
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 1.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.