Literature DB >> 23954780

Classification of methods in transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) and evolving strategy from historical approaches to contemporary innovations.

Berkan Guleyupoglu1, Pedro Schestatsky, Dylan Edwards, Felipe Fregni, Marom Bikson.   

Abstract

Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES) encompasses all methods of non-invasive current application to the brain used in research and clinical practice. We present the first comprehensive and technical review, explaining the evolution of tES in both terminology and dosage over the past 100 years of research to present day. Current transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation (tPCS) approaches such as Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation (CES) descended from Electrosleep (ES) through Cranial Electro-stimulation Therapy (CET), Transcerebral Electrotherapy (TCET), and NeuroElectric Therapy (NET) while others like Transcutaneous Cranial Electrical Stimulation (TCES) descended from Electroanesthesia (EA) through Limoge, and Interferential Stimulation. Prior to a contemporary resurgence in interest, variations of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation were explored intermittently, including Polarizing current, Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation (GVS), and Transcranial Micropolarization. The development of these approaches alongside Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) and pharmacological developments are considered. Both the roots and unique features of contemporary approaches such as transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) and transcranial Random Noise Stimulation (tRNS) are discussed. Trends and incremental developments in electrode montage and waveform spanning decades are presented leading to the present day. Commercial devices, seminal conferences, and regulatory decisions are noted. We conclude with six rules on how increasing medical and technological sophistication may now be leveraged for broader success and adoption of tES.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alternating; CES; CET; Contemporary; Cranial; Direct; Dosage; EA; ECT; EN; ES; Electroanesthesia; Electronarcosis; Electrosleep; Electrostimulation; Electrotherapy; FEAST; HD-tDCS; Historical; History; Interferential; Limoge; NET; Pulsed; Stimulation; TCES; TCET; Transcerebral; Transcutaneous; tACS; tDCS; tES; tPCS; tRNS

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23954780      PMCID: PMC3833074          DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.07.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  103 in total

Review 1.  Transcranial direct current stimulation--update 2011.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.406

2.  Comparatively weak after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on cortical excitability in humans.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Klára Boros; Csaba Poreisz; Leila Chaieb; Daniella Terney; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Transcranial current stimulation focality using disc and ring electrode configurations: FEM analysis.

Authors:  Abhishek Datta; Maged Elwassif; Fortunato Battaglia; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 4.  Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES - tDCS; tRNS, tACS) methods.

Authors:  Walter Paulus
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 2.868

Review 5.  Why do some promising brain-stimulation devices fail the next steps of clinical development?

Authors:  Rodrigo C L Edelmuth; Michael A Nitsche; Linamara Battistella; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.166

6.  Computational models of transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Asif Rahman; Abhishek Datta
Journal:  Clin EEG Neurosci       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.843

7.  Electrodes for high-definition transcutaneous DC stimulation for applications in drug delivery and electrotherapy, including tDCS.

Authors:  Preet Minhas; Varun Bansal; Jinal Patel; Johnson S Ho; Julian Diaz; Abhishek Datta; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.390

8.  A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of bilateral and right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy at different stimulus intensities.

Authors:  H A Sackeim; J Prudic; D P Devanand; M S Nobler; S H Lisanby; S Peyser; L Fitzsimons; B J Moody; J Clark
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2000-05

9.  Electroanesthesia studies: a new current pattern and control of fading.

Authors:  R H Smith; J H Andrew; H Suzuki; J Tatsuno
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1968 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  Feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation for decreasing post-ERCP pain: a randomized, sham-controlled, pilot study.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Borckardt; Joseph Romagnuolo; Scott T Reeves; Alok Madan; Heather Frohman; Will Beam; Mark S George
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  46 in total

Review 1.  Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines.

Authors:  A Antal; I Alekseichuk; M Bikson; J Brockmöller; A R Brunoni; R Chen; L G Cohen; G Dowthwaite; J Ellrich; A Flöel; F Fregni; M S George; R Hamilton; J Haueisen; C S Herrmann; F C Hummel; J P Lefaucheur; D Liebetanz; C K Loo; C D McCaig; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; V Moliadze; M A Nitsche; R Nowak; F Padberg; A Pascual-Leone; W Poppendieck; A Priori; S Rossi; P M Rossini; J Rothwell; M A Rueger; G Ruffini; K Schellhorn; H R Siebner; Y Ugawa; A Wexler; U Ziemann; M Hallett; W Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 2.  Safety of noninvasive brain stimulation in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Chandramouli Krishnan; Luciana Santos; Mark D Peterson; Margaret Ehinger
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 3.  Transcranial electrical stimulation nomenclature.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Devin Adair; Greg Kronberg; William J Tyler; Andrea Antal; Abhishek Datta; Bernhard A Sabel; Michael A Nitsche; Colleen Loo; Dylan Edwards; Hamed Ekhtiari; Helena Knotkova; Adam J Woods; Benjamin M Hampstead; Bashar W Badran; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 4.  Corticospinal and spinal adaptations to motor skill and resistance training: Potential mechanisms and implications for motor rehabilitation and athletic development.

Authors:  Jamie Tallent; Alex Woodhead; Ashlyn K Frazer; Jessica Hill; Dawson J Kidgell; Glyn Howatson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  A Description and Critical Analysis of the Therapeutic Uses of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Implications for Clinical Practice and Research.

Authors:  David E Vance; Pariya L Fazeli; Shameka L Cody; Tyler R Bell; Caitlin Northcutt Pope
Journal:  Nursing (Auckl)       Date:  2016-09-14

Review 6.  New modalities and directions for dystonia care.

Authors:  Genko Oyama; Nobutaka Hattori
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  Regulatory Considerations for the Clinical and Research Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS): review and recommendations from an expert panel.

Authors:  F Fregni; M A Nitsche; C K Loo; A R Brunoni; P Marangolo; J Leite; S Carvalho; N Bolognini; W Caumo; N J Paik; M Simis; K Ueda; H Ekhitari; P Luu; D M Tucker; W J Tyler; J Brunelin; A Datta; C H Juan; G Venkatasubramanian; P S Boggio; M Bikson
Journal:  Clin Res Regul Aff       Date:  2015-03-01

Review 8.  Animal models of transcranial direct current stimulation: Methods and mechanisms.

Authors:  Mark P Jackson; Asif Rahman; Belen Lafon; Gregory Kronberg; Doris Ling; Lucas C Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  A Halo-Shaped Electrode Holder System for HD-tDCS is a Practical and Flexible Alternative to the EEG Cap 4×1-Ring Montage.

Authors:  E M Caparelli-Dáquer; A F Valente; F Nigri; D J Edwards; A H Medeiros
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 8.955

10.  Tolerability of Repeated Application of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation with Limited Outputs to Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Bhaskar Paneri; Devin Adair; Chris Thomas; Niranjan Khadka; Vaishali Patel; William J Tyler; Lucas Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 8.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.