Literature DB >> 18441418

Transcranial current stimulation focality using disc and ring electrode configurations: FEM analysis.

Abhishek Datta1, Maged Elwassif, Fortunato Battaglia, Marom Bikson.   

Abstract

We calculated the electric fields induced in the brain during transcranial current stimulation (TCS) using a finite-element concentric spheres human head model. A range of disc electrode configurations were simulated: (1) distant-bipolar; (2) adjacent-bipolar; (3) tripolar; and three ring designs, (4) belt, (5) concentric ring, and (6) double concentric ring. We compared the focality of each configuration targeting cortical structures oriented normal to the surface ('surface-radial' and 'cross-section radial'), cortical structures oriented along the brain surface ('surface-tangential' and 'cross-section tangential') and non-oriented cortical surface structures ('surface-magnitude' and 'cross-section magnitude'). For surface-radial fields, we further considered the 'polarity' of modulation (e.g. superficial cortical neuron soma hyper/depolarizing). The distant-bipolar configuration, which is comparable with commonly used TCS protocols, resulted in diffuse (un-focal) modulation with bi-directional radial modulation under each electrode and tangential modulation between electrodes. Increasing the proximity of the two electrodes (adjacent-bipolar electrode configuration) increased focality, at the cost of more surface current. At similar electrode distances, the tripolar-electrodes configuration produced comparable peak focality, but reduced radial bi-directionality. The concentric-ring configuration resulted in the highest spatial focality and uni-directional radial modulation, at the expense of increased total surface current. Changing ring dimensions, or use of two concentric rings, allow titration of this balance. The concentric-ring design may thus provide an optimized configuration for targeted modulation of superficial cortical neurons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18441418     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/5/2/007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  96 in total

1.  Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with skull defects and skull plates: high-resolution computational FEM study of factors altering cortical current flow.

Authors:  Abhishek Datta; Marom Bikson; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Effect of tDCS with an extracephalic reference electrode on cardio-respiratory and autonomic functions.

Authors:  Yves Vandermeeren; Jacques Jamart; Michel Ossemann
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.288

Review 3.  Fundamentals of transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation dose: definition, selection, and reporting practices.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Timothy A Wagner; Pedro C Miranda; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus; Sarah H Lisanby; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Cutaneous perception during tDCS: role of electrode shape and sponge salinity.

Authors:  Preet Minhas; Abhishek Datta; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad.

Authors:  Abhishek Datta; Varun Bansal; Julian Diaz; Jinal Patel; Davide Reato; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  Electrode montages for tDCS and weak transcranial electrical stimulation: role of "return" electrode's position and size.

Authors:  M Bikson; Abhishek Datta; Asif Rahman; Jen Scaturro
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Transcranial direct current stimulation for major depression: a general system for quantifying transcranial electrotherapy dosage.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Peter Bulow; John W Stiller; Abhishek Datta; Fortunato Battaglia; Sergei V Karnup; Teodor T Postolache
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.598

8.  Clinician accessible tools for GUI computational models of transcranial electrical stimulation: BONSAI and SPHERES.

Authors:  Dennis Q Truong; Mathias Hüber; Xihe Xie; Abhishek Datta; Asif Rahman; Lucas C Parra; Jacek P Dmochowski; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 9.  Animal models of transcranial direct current stimulation: Methods and mechanisms.

Authors:  Mark P Jackson; Asif Rahman; Belen Lafon; Gregory Kronberg; Doris Ling; Lucas C Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  One-dimensional representation of a neuron in a uniform electric field.

Authors:  Thomas Radman; Abhishek Datta; Raddy L Ramos; Joshua C Brumberg; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2009
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.