Literature DB >> 25200178

Electrifying the motor engram: effects of tDCS on motor learning and control.

Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry1, Reza Shadmehr.   

Abstract

Learning to control our movements is accompanied by neuroplasticity of motor areas of the brain. The mechanisms of neuroplasticity are diverse and produce what is referred to as the motor engram, i.e., the neural trace of the motor memory. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) alters the neural and behavioral correlates of motor learning, but its precise influence on the motor engram is unknown. In this review, we summarize the effects of tDCS on neural activity and suggest a few key principles: (1) Firing rates are increased by anodal polarization and decreased by cathodal polarization, (2) anodal polarization strengthens newly formed associations, and (3) polarization modulates the memory of new/preferred firing patterns. With these principles in mind, we review the effects of tDCS on motor control, motor learning, and clinical applications. The increased spontaneous and evoked firing rates may account for the modulation of dexterity in non-learning tasks by tDCS. The facilitation of new association may account for the effect of tDCS on learning in sequence tasks while the ability of tDCS to strengthen memories of new firing patterns may underlie the effect of tDCS on consolidation of skills. We then describe the mechanisms of neuroplasticity of motor cortical areas and how they might be influenced by tDCS. We end with current challenges for the fields of brain stimulation and motor learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25200178      PMCID: PMC4199902          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-4087-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  246 in total

1.  Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; Astrid Schauenburg; Nicolas Lang; David Liebetanz; Cornelia Exner; Walter Paulus; Frithjof Tergau
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Contralateral and ipsilateral motor effects after transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Bradley W Vines; Dinesh G Nair; Gottfried Schlaug
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Long-term motor cortex plasticity induced by an electronic neural implant.

Authors:  Andrew Jackson; Jaideep Mavoori; Eberhard E Fetz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-10-22       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance.

Authors:  Sander Nieuwenhuis; Birte U Forstmann; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Probing for hemispheric specialization for motor skill learning: a transcranial direct current stimulation study.

Authors:  Heidi M Schambra; Mitsunari Abe; David A Luckenbaugh; Janine Reis; John W Krakauer; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Dopaminergic modulation of motor maps in rat motor cortex: an in vivo study.

Authors:  J A Hosp; K Molina-Luna; B Hertler; C Osei Atiemo; A R Luft
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Polarity-sensitive modulation of cortical neurotransmitters by transcranial stimulation.

Authors:  Charlotte J Stagg; Jonathan G Best; Mary C Stephenson; Jacinta O'Shea; Marzena Wylezinska; Z Tamas Kincses; Peter G Morris; Paul M Matthews; Heidi Johansen-Berg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Immediate effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on postural stability and functional mobility in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Geert Verheyden; Joanne Purdey; Malcolm Burnett; Jonathan Cole; Ann Ashburn
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 10.338

9.  Polarity and timing-dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in explicit motor learning.

Authors:  C J Stagg; G Jayaram; D Pastor; Z T Kincses; P M Matthews; H Johansen-Berg
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Reducing excessive GABA-mediated tonic inhibition promotes functional recovery after stroke.

Authors:  Andrew N Clarkson; Ben S Huang; Sarah E Macisaac; Istvan Mody; S Thomas Carmichael
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  16 in total

1.  Brain-computer interface: current and emerging rehabilitation applications.

Authors:  Janis J Daly; Jane E Huggins
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Using tDCS to facilitate motor learning in speech production: The role of timing.

Authors:  Adam Buchwald; Holly Calhoun; Stacey Rimikis; Mara Steinberg Lowe; Rebecca Wellner; Dylan J Edwards
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Why is the explicit component of motor adaptation limited in elderly adults?

Authors:  Koenraad Vandevoorde; Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Suppression of Motor Sequence Learning and Execution Through Anodal Cerebellar Transcranial Electrical Stimulation.

Authors:  Angela Voegtle; Clara Terlutter; Katharina Nikolai; Amr Farahat; Hermann Hinrichs; Catherine M Sweeney-Reed
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 3.648

5.  Combining motor learning and brain stimulation to enhance post-stroke neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Yves Vandermeeren; Stéphanie Lefebvre
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.135

Review 6.  The contribution of interindividual factors to variability of response in transcranial direct current stimulation studies.

Authors:  Lucia M Li; Kazumasa Uehara; Takashi Hanakawa
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 5.505

7.  Near-Infrared Spectroscopy - Electroencephalography-Based Brain-State-Dependent Electrotherapy: A Computational Approach Based on Excitation-Inhibition Balance Hypothesis.

Authors:  Snigdha Dagar; Shubhajit Roy Chowdhury; Raju Surampudi Bapi; Anirban Dutta; Dipanjan Roy
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Anodal tDCS over the Primary Motor Cortex Facilitates Long-Term Memory Formation Reflecting Use-Dependent Plasticity.

Authors:  Orjon Rroji; Kris van Kuyck; Bart Nuttin; Nicole Wenderoth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Tagging motor memories with transcranial direct current stimulation allows later artificially-controlled retrieval.

Authors:  Daichi Nozaki; Atsushi Yokoi; Takahiro Kimura; Masaya Hirashima; Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Reversed Polarity bi-tDCS over M1 during a Five Days Motor Task Training Did Not Influence Motor Learning. A Triple-Blind Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Laura Flix-Díez; Miguel Delicado-Miralles; Francisco Gurdiel-Álvarez; Enrique Velasco; María Galán-Calle; Sergio Lerma Lara
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-05-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.