Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 CORR Insights™: Intramedullary nails result in more reoperations than sliding hip screws in two-part intertrochanteric fractures.

Literature DB >> 23334706

CORR Insights™: Intramedullary nails result in more reoperations than sliding hip screws in two-part intertrochanteric fractures.

Abstract

This CORR Insights™ is a commentary on the article "Intramedullary Nails Result in More Reoperations Than Sliding Hip Screws in Two-part Intertrochanteric Fractures" by Matre et al. available at DOI- 10.1007/s11999-012-2728-2 .

Entities: Disease

Mesh：

Year: 2013 PMID： 23334706 PMCID： PMC3586013 DOI： 10.1007/s11999-013-2791-3

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res ISSN： 0009-921X Impact factor: 4.176

12 in total

1. A randomised comparison of AMBI, TGN and PFN for treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures.

Authors: S Papasimos; C M Koutsojannis; A Panagopoulos; P Megas; E Lambiris
Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 3.067

2. Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures.

Authors: M R Baumgaertner; S L Curtin; D M Lindskog
Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 1998-03 Impact factor: 4.176

3. Gamma nails and dynamic hip screws for peritrochanteric fractures. A randomised prospective study in elderly patients.

Authors: K S Leung; W S So; W Y Shen; P W Hui
Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Br Date: 1992-05

4. Trochanteric gamma nail and compression hip screw for trochanteric fractures: a randomized, prospective, comparative study in 210 elderly patients with a new design of the gamma nail.

Authors: A Lizaur Utrilla; J Sanz Reig; F Miralles Muñoz; C Bendala Tufanisco
Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 2.512

5. The standard Gamma nail or the Medoff sliding plate for unstable trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. A randomised, controlled trial.

Authors: R Miedel; S Ponzer; H Törnkvist; A Söderqvist; J Tidermark
Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Br Date: 2005-01

6. Prospective randomized controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus dynamic screw and plate for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur.

Authors: C I Adams; C M Robinson; C M Court-Brown; M M McQueen
Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 2.512

7. Intramedullary hip screw versus sliding hip screw for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly.

Authors: P Harrington; A Nihal; A K Singhania; F R Howell
Journal: Injury Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 2.586

8. Use of an intramedullary hip-screw compared with a compression hip-screw with a plate for intertrochanteric femoral fractures. A prospective, randomized study of one hundred patients.

Authors: D C Hardy; P Y Descamps; P Krallis; L Fabeck; P Smets; C L Bertens; P E Delince
Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 1998-05 Impact factor: 5.284

9. Intertrochanteric fractures of the femur: a randomized prospective comparison of the Gamma nail and the Ambi hip screw.

Authors: C W Hoffman; T G Lynskey
Journal: Aust N Z J Surg Date: 1996-03

10. A randomized study of the compression hip screw and Gamma nail in 426 fractures.

Authors: Leif Ahrengart; Hans Törnkvist; Per Fornander; Karl-Göran Thorngren; Lauri Pasanen; Per Wahlström; Seppo Honkonen; Urban Lindgren
Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 4.176

1 in total

Review 1. Recent advances in the treatment of hip fractures in the elderly.

Authors: Joshua C Rozell; Mark Hasenauer; Derek J Donegan; Mark Neuman
Journal: F1000Res Date: 2016-08-11

1 in total