Literature DB >> 15795570

Trochanteric gamma nail and compression hip screw for trochanteric fractures: a randomized, prospective, comparative study in 210 elderly patients with a new design of the gamma nail.

A Lizaur Utrilla1, J Sanz Reig, F Miralles Muñoz, C Bendala Tufanisco.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the results between a new intramedullary Gamma nail and a compression hip screw in the treatment of trochanteric fractures.
DESIGN: Prospective randomized.
SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: Two hundred ten consecutive patients older than 65 years with trochanteric femoral fractures.
INTERVENTIONS: Treatment with a compression hip screw or a new design of the Trochanteric Gamma nail (180 mm in length with a mediolateral angle of 4 degrees and available only with a proximal diameter of 17 mm and distal diameter of 11 mm). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Operative and fluoroscopy times, blood loss, functional outcome, complication rate, and failure of fixation.
RESULTS: The Trochanteric Gamma nail was used in 104 patients and the compression hip screw in 106. The 2 groups were similar in terms of their preoperative data, with a median follow-up of 13.6 months (range 12-30). The results show no difference in operating time (P = 0.21), but the Trochanteric Gamma nail group had a significantly shorter fluoroscopy time (P = 0.006), and the number of patients transfused and the mean of units of blood transfused were significantly less in the Trochanteric Gamma nail group (P = 0.013, 0.046, respectively). Mortality within 12 months was similar in both groups (P = 0.83). All fractures were radiographically healed at the last visit. There was no difference in intraoperative and postoperative complications or rate of fixation failure between the 2 groups, and no case of secondary shaft fracture of the femur was encountered in this study. In the entire series, there was no difference in the functional outcome (P = 0.74), but the postoperative walking ability was better in those patients with unstable fractures who were treated with the Trochanteric Gamma nail (P = 0.017).
CONCLUSIONS: The new Trochanteric Gamma nail is an effective method for the treatment of trochanteric femoral fractures in elderly patients. The indication for either Trochanteric Gamma nail or compression hip screw is similar in stable fractures, but we recommend the use of the Trochanteric Gamma nail for unstable trochanteric fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15795570     DOI: 10.1097/01.bot.0000151819.95075.ad

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  76 in total

1.  Comparison of functional recovery in the very early period after surgery between plate and nail fixation for correction of stable femoral intertrochanteric fractures: a controlled clinical trial of 18 patients.

Authors:  Koun Yamauchi; Kazunari Fushimi; Goshi Shirai; Masashi Fukuta
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2014-06

2.  Treatment of reverse oblique trochanteric femoral fractures with proximal femoral nail.

Authors:  Korhan Ozkan; Engin Eceviz; Koray Unay; Levent Tasyikan; Budak Akman; Abdullah Eren
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-03-28       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Cephalomedullary fixation for intertrochanteric fractures: an operative technical tip.

Authors:  Lin Jin; Liping Zhang; Zhiyong Hou; Wei Chen; Pengcheng Wang; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-03-22

Review 4.  Reduction techniques for difficult subtrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Zinon T Kokkalis; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Dimitris I Ntourantonis; Vasilios G Igoumenou; Thekla Antoniadou; Renos Karamanis; Panayiotis D Megaloikonomos; Georgios N Panagopoulos; Dimitrios Giannoulis; Eleftheria Souliotis; Theodosis Saranteas; Panayiotis J Papagelopoulos; Elias Panagiotopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-05-31

5.  Outcome of treatment of fracture neck of femur using hemiarthroplasty versus dynamic hip screw.

Authors:  Dd Mue; Mn Salihu; F0 Awonusi; Wt Yongu; Jn Kortor; Ic Elachi
Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg       Date:  2013-04

Review 6.  [Pertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly].

Authors:  G H Sandmann; P Biberthaler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Biomechanical evaluation of the risk of secondary fracture around short versus long cephalomedullary nails.

Authors:  William E Daner; John R Owen; Jennifer S Wayne; Ryan B Graves; Mark C Willis
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-06-08

8.  A comparative biomechanical study of proximal femoral nail (InterTAN) and proximal femoral nail antirotation for intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Yanfeng Huang; Chunlin Zhang; Yi Luo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Statistical fallacies in orthopedic research.

Authors:  Abhaya Indrayan
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Is distal locking with IMHN necessary in every pertrochanteric fracture?

Authors:  Jirí Skála-Rosenbaum; Jan Bartonícek; Radek Bartoska
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.