Literature DB >> 11030533

Shockwave frequency affects fragmentation in a kidney stone model.

M J Weir1, N Tariq, R J Honey.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the effect of altering shockwave frequency on the efficiency of stone fragmentation using the MFL 5000 spark-gap lithotripter.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Standardized solid plaster stones, 12.0 +/- 0.5 mm in diameter, were fragmented at an energy setting of 20 kV. The shockwave frequencies tested were 60, 80, and 117 per minute. Stones were fragmented throughout the entire lifespan of the electrode, from 0 to >100% consumption, at each frequency tested. Electrode pressure output was studied for each frequency.
RESULTS: A greater number of shocks was required to fragment the plaster balls at higher frequencies (regression coefficient 1.93; p < 0.003). An inverse relation was found between the number of shocks necessary to break the stones and electrode consumption (regression coefficient -2.16; p < 0.001). The analysis of delivered pressure from the electrode failed to demonstrate a linear relation with frequency (regression coefficient -0.40; p < 0.728) or consumption (regression coefficient -1.11; p < 0.158).
CONCLUSIONS: The number of shocks required to fragment a stone is influenced in part by the frequency at which the shockwaves are delivered. Increasing the shockwave frequency from 60 to 117 per minute in this study caused a significant rise in the number of shocks required to break the stone. The pressure output of the electrode was similar at the frequencies tested, thus making the difference in stone fragmentation secondary to the mechanism of stone disintegration and not the function of the electrode.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11030533     DOI: 10.1089/08927790050152113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  19 in total

1.  An efficient treatment strategy for histotripsy by removing cavitation memory.

Authors:  Tzu-Yin Wang; Zhen Xu; Timothy L Hall; J Brian Fowlkes; Charles A Cain
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Best of the AUA Annual Meeting: Highlights From the 2010 American Urological Association Meeting, May 29-June 3, 2010, San Francisco, CA.

Authors:  J Curtis Nickel; Akira Furuta; Michael B Chancellor; Claus G Roehrborn; Dean G Assimos; Ellen Shapiro; Michael K Brawer
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2010

3.  Why stones break better at slow shockwave rates than at fast rates: in vitro study with a research electrohydraulic lithotripter.

Authors:  Yuri A Pishchalnikov; James A McAteer; James C Williams; Irina V Pishchalnikova; R Jason Vonderhaar
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Acoustic bubble removal to enhance SWL efficacy at high shock rate: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Alexander P Duryea; William W Roberts; Charles A Cain; Hedieh A Tamaddoni; Timothy L Hall
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Removal of residual nuclei following a cavitation event using low-amplitude ultrasound.

Authors:  Alexander P Duryea; Charles A Cain; Hedieh A Tamaddoni; William W Roberts; Timothy L Hall
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Celebrating 75 years.

Authors:  Darren Beiko; R John D'A Honey; Kenneth T Pace; John D Denstedt; Hassan Razvi; Denis H Hosking; Richard W Norman; James W L Wilson
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Enhanced High-Rate Shockwave Lithotripsy Stone Comminution in an In Vivo Porcine Model Using Acoustic Bubble Coalescence.

Authors:  Hedieh Alavi Tamaddoni; William W Roberts; Alexander P Duryea; Charles A Cain; Timothy L Hall
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Turbulent water coupling in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Jaclyn Lautz; Georgy Sankin; Pei Zhong
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Controlled cavitation to augment SWL stone comminution: mechanistic insights in vitro.

Authors:  Alexander P Duryea; William W Roberts; Charles A Cain; Timothy L Hall
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.725

10.  Does treatment rate impact the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for kidney or ureteral stones?

Authors:  K Muruganandham; Aneesh Srivastava
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2007-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.