Literature DB >> 36267107

Furosemide improves the stone clearance rate of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for kidney stones but not ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Feng Yao1, Ke Li1, ShiQuan Huang1, XueSong Cheng1, XiaoLiang Jiang2.   

Abstract

Introduction: We conducted a meta-analysis (MA) to investigate the effects of furosemide on the prognosis of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) therapy to remove renal (RS) and ureteric stones (US).
Methods: We screened scientific databases including PubMed, Clinicalkey, Google Scholar, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane, from the date of establishment until March 2022, to search for randomized controlled trials evaluating SWL, in combination with furosemide (experimental group) or with SWL alone (control group), in treating RS or US. Our search terms included furosemide, extracorporeal SWL, and urolithiasis. For this MA, we employed the Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan version 5.3.0.
Results: Six trials, involving 1344 participants, with RS (n = 1097) and/or US (n = 247), met our predefined criteria. This included 137 proximal ureteral stones (PUSs), 35 mid-ureteral stones (MUS), and 75 distal ureteral stones (DUS). In case of RS, the experimental group exhibited significantly enhanced clearance, relative to controls (risk ratio [RR] = 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.07-1.25, p = 0.0002), yet there was no obvious difference in the PUS, MUS, and DUS (RR = 1.14, 95% CI = 0.97-1.33, p = 0.10; odds ratio [OR] = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.40-3.95, p = 0.69; RR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.99-1.49, p = 0.06). There was also no marked difference between fragmentations in either group. Only reports of SWL treatment of RS provided adequate data on shocks, sessions, and complications for our analysis. Unfortunately, there was no significant alteration between the two groups.
Conclusion: According to our analysis, furosemide strongly accelerates the clearance rate of SWL-treated RS. However, it does not enhance the fragmentation rate. Given this evidence, we propose that furosemide does not significantly improve the efficacy of SWL therapy in removing US. Registration: Our work is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020204780).
© The Author(s), 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy; furosemide; urolithiasis

Year:  2022        PMID: 36267107      PMCID: PMC9577065          DOI: 10.1177/17562872221128473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Adv Urol        ISSN: 1756-2872


  24 in total

1.  Ureteral Stent Placement During Shockwave Lithotripsy: Characterizing Guideline Discordant Practice.

Authors:  Abhinav Khanna; Manoj Monga; Daniel Sun; Tianming Gao; Jesse Schold; Robert Abouassaly
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 2.  alpha-Blockers to assist stone clearance after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yefang Zhu; Diederick Duijvesz; Maroeska M Rovers; Tycho M Lock
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  In situ extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral calculi: investigation of factors influencing stone fragmentation and appropriate number of sessions for changing treatment modality.

Authors:  H H Kim; J H Lee; M S Park; S E Lee; S W Kim
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 4.  Epidemiology of stone disease across the world.

Authors:  Igor Sorokin; Charalampos Mamoulakis; Katsuhito Miyazawa; Allen Rodgers; Jamsheer Talati; Yair Lotan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Is high diuresis an important prerequisite for successful SWL-disintegration of ureteral stones?

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius; Trine Aronsen; Stina Bohgard; Marita Fredriksson; Elsie-Marie Jonason; Monica Olsson; Kristina Sjöström
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2009-12-08

6.  Efficacy of intravenous hydration during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in improving ureteral stone treatment success rate.

Authors:  Weiming Cheng; Yi-Chun Chiu; Yu-Hua Fan; Chang-Chi Chang; Kuo-Wei Kao
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 3.369

7.  Does a slower treatment rate impact the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for solitary kidney or ureteral stones?

Authors:  Job Chacko; Michael Moore; Noel Sankey; Paramjit S Chandhoke
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis.

Authors:  Christian Türk; Aleš Petřík; Kemal Sarica; Christian Seitz; Andreas Skolarikos; Michael Straub; Thomas Knoll
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 9.  The efficacy and safety of silodosin for the treatment of ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Diandong Yang; Jitao Wu; Hejia Yuan; Yuanshan Cui
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 2.264

10.  Efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy with furosemide and hydration in renal stone management: A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Safiullah Sohu; Munawar Hussain Soomro; Riaz Hussain Mangrio; Arif Ali Shaikh; Azizullah Mirani; Khoob Chand; Malik Hussain Jalbani
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2019-07-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.