PURPOSE: The objective of our study was to determine if trophectoderm biopsy, vitrification, array-comparative genomic hybridization and single thawed euploid embryo transfer (STEET) can reduce multiple gestations and yield high pregnancy and low miscarriage rates. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study comparing single thawed euploid embryo to routine age matched in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients that underwent blastocyst transfer from 2008 to 2011 and to our best prognosis group donor oocyte recipients (Donor). Our main outcome measures were implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, spontaneous abortion rate and multiple gestation rate. RESULTS: The STEET group had a significantly higher implantation rate (58 %, 53/91) than the routine IVF group (39 %, 237/613) while the Donor group (57 %, 387/684) had a similar implantation rate. The clinical pregnancy rates were not statistically different between the STEET and IVF groups. However, the multiple gestation rate was significantly lower in the STEET group (STEET 2 % versus IVF 34 %, Donor 47 %). CONCLUSIONS: STEET results in a high pregnancy rate, low multiple gestation rate and miscarriage rates. Despite the older age of STEET patients and transfer of twice as many embryos, the implantation rate for STEET was indistinguishable from that for egg donation. STEET offers an improvement to IVF, lowering risks without compromising pregnancy rate.
PURPOSE: The objective of our study was to determine if trophectoderm biopsy, vitrification, array-comparative genomic hybridization and single thawed euploid embryo transfer (STEET) can reduce multiple gestations and yield high pregnancy and low miscarriage rates. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study comparing single thawed euploid embryo to routine age matched in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients that underwent blastocyst transfer from 2008 to 2011 and to our best prognosis group donor oocyte recipients (Donor). Our main outcome measures were implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, spontaneous abortion rate and multiple gestation rate. RESULTS: The STEET group had a significantly higher implantation rate (58 %, 53/91) than the routine IVF group (39 %, 237/613) while the Donor group (57 %, 387/684) had a similar implantation rate. The clinical pregnancy rates were not statistically different between the STEET and IVF groups. However, the multiple gestation rate was significantly lower in the STEET group (STEET 2 % versus IVF 34 %, Donor 47 %). CONCLUSIONS:STEET results in a high pregnancy rate, low multiple gestation rate and miscarriage rates. Despite the older age of STEETpatients and transfer of twice as many embryos, the implantation rate for STEET was indistinguishable from that for egg donation. STEET offers an improvement to IVF, lowering risks without compromising pregnancy rate.
Authors: William B Schoolcraft; Elpida Fragouli; John Stevens; Santiago Munne; Mandy G Katz-Jaffe; Dagan Wells Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2009-11-25 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: D Hvidtjørn; J Grove; D Schendel; C Svaerke; L A Schieve; P Uldall; E Ernst; B Jacobsson; P Thorsen Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2010-06-16 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: S Munné; S Chen; P Colls; J Garrisi; X Zheng; N Cekleniak; M Lenzi; P Hughes; J Fischer; M Garrisi; G Tomkin; J Cohen Journal: Reprod Biomed Online Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 3.828
Authors: Zhihong Yang; Jiaen Liu; Gary S Collins; Shala A Salem; Xiaohong Liu; Sarah S Lyle; Alison C Peck; E Scott Sills; Rifaat D Salem Journal: Mol Cytogenet Date: 2012-05-02 Impact factor: 2.009
Authors: Sang Min Kang; Sang Won Lee; San Hyun Yoon; Joo Cheol Kim; Jin Ho Lim; Seong Goo Lee Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2013-05-30 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Yael G Kramer; Jason D Kofinas; Katherine Melzer; Nicole Noyes; Caroline McCaffrey; Julia Buldo-Licciardi; David H McCulloh; James A Grifo Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2014-06-25 Impact factor: 3.412