Literature DB >> 11821287

Chromosomal mosaicism throughout human preimplantation development in vitro: incidence, type, and relevance to embryo outcome.

Magdalena Bielanska1, Seang Lin Tan, Asangla Ao.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A large percentage of in-vitro generated cleavage stage human embryos are chromosomally mosaic, consisting of both normal (diploid) and abnormal (non-diploid) cells. The present study characterized mosaicism at each stage of cleavage division and examined its effect on preimplantation development in vitro.
METHODS: A total of 216 normally fertilized (two-pronucleate) embryos which were not selected for transfer to the patients were analysed for chromosomal abnormalities using multi-colour fluorescence in-situ hybridization DNA probes specific for three to five of nine different chromosomes (X, Y, 2, 7, 13, 16, 18, 21, 22).
RESULTS: Overall, 48.1% of embryos were mosaic. The frequency of mosaic embryos increased from 15.2 to 49.4 to 58.1%, from the 2-4-cell to 5-8-cell to morula stages respectively, and the types of non-diploid cells detected were mostly aneuploid or chaotic. The incidence of mosaicism at the blastocyst stage was 90.9%; however, most of the mosaicism comprised diploid and polyploid cells. Arrested mosaic embryos had a higher incidence of chaotic abnormalities, and higher proportions of abnormal cells compared with the non-arrested group.
CONCLUSIONS: Post-zygotic errors leading to mosaicism may occur, and persist throughout preimplantation development in vitro. Our results suggest that mosaicism involving multiple chromosomal imbalances and/or imbalances affecting a high proportion of cells in an embryo appear to impair development to the blastocyst stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11821287     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/17.2.413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  51 in total

1.  The relationship of pronuclear stage morphology and chromosome status at cleavage stage.

Authors:  Chun-Kai Chen; Guan-Yi Shen; Shang-Gwo Horng; Chia-Woei Wang; Hong-Yuan Huang; Hsin-Shin Wang; Yung-Kuei Soong
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Genetic and epigenetic X-chromosome variations in a parthenogenetic human embryonic stem cell line.

Authors:  Weiqiang Liu; Yifei Yin; Yonghua Jiang; Chaohui Kou; Yumei Luo; Shengchang Huang; Yuhong Zheng; Shaoying Li; Qing Li; Liyuan Guo; Shaorong Gao; Xiaofang Sun
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Comparison of growth rates of fresh and frozen-thawed embryos according to chromosomal status.

Authors:  Rohini Edirisinghe; Rodney Jemmott; John Allan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Use of cross-species in-situ hybridization (ZOO-FISH) to assess chromosome abnormalities in day-6 in-vivo- or in-vitro-produced sheep embryos.

Authors:  Gianfranco Coppola; Basil Alexander; Dino Di Berardino; Elizabeth St John; Parvathi K Basrur; W Allan King
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  Chromosomal mosaicism in mouse two-cell embryos after paternal exposure to acrylamide.

Authors:  Francesco Marchetti; Jack Bishop; Xiu Lowe; Andrew J Wyrobek
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Evaluation of PCR-based preimplantation genetic diagnosis applied to monogenic diseases: a collaborative ESHRE PGD consortium study.

Authors:  Jos Dreesen; Aspasia Destouni; Georgia Kourlaba; Birte Degn; Wulf Christensen Mette; Filipa Carvalho; Celine Moutou; Sioban Sengupta; Seema Dhanjal; Pamela Renwick; Steven Davies; Emmanouel Kanavakis; Gary Harton; Joanne Traeger-Synodinos
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  A greater number of euploid blastocysts in a given cohort predicts excellent outcomes in single embryo transfer cycles.

Authors:  Scott Morin; Katherine Melzer-Ross; David McCulloh; Jamie Grifo; Santiago Munné
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Mechanisms of mosaicism, chimerism and uniparental disomy identified by single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis.

Authors:  Laura K Conlin; Brian D Thiel; Carsten G Bonnemann; Livija Medne; Linda M Ernst; Elaine H Zackai; Matthew A Deardorff; Ian D Krantz; Hakon Hakonarson; Nancy B Spinner
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  Genome-wide microarray evidence that 8-cell human blastomeres over-express cell cycle drivers and under-express checkpoints.

Authors:  Ann A Kiessling; Ritsa Bletsa; Bryan Desmarais; Christina Mara; Kostas Kallianidis; Dimitris Loutradis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 10.  Approaches to improve the diagnosis and management of infertility.

Authors:  P Devroey; B C J M Fauser; K Diedrich
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 15.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.