Literature DB >> 17509208

Maternal age, morphology, development and chromosome abnormalities in over 6000 cleavage-stage embryos.

S Munné1, S Chen, P Colls, J Garrisi, X Zheng, N Cekleniak, M Lenzi, P Hughes, J Fischer, M Garrisi, G Tomkin, J Cohen.   

Abstract

Previous studies assessing the relationship between embryo development, maternal age and chromosome abnormalities were either small or analysed mostly embryos not suitable for replacement. The present study includes >6000 embryos, including many suitable for replacement. Embryos with the best morphology and development were 44% euploid in patients younger than 35, decreasing to 21% in patients 41 and older. The worst morphology group had only 30% normal embryos from patients younger than 35, and 12% in embryos from patients 41 and older. Thus morphological analysis was able to improve the population of normal embryos only from 30 to 44% in the best of cases. Regarding specific abnormalities, 20% of embryos were aneuploid, 32% aneuploid plus other abnormalities, and the rest had post-meiotic abnormalities. Of those, only aneuploidy increased with maternal age. There were no big differences in the frequency of chromosome abnormalities depending on patient indication, within a similar age group. In summary, previous trends detected in suboptimal embryos were also confirmed in the best embryos for replacement. Although dysmorphism and advanced maternal age are both related to chromosome abnormalities, these parameters can yield at most <50% euploid embryos, and other techniques such as preimplantation diagnosis are required to ensure that only euploid embryos are replaced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17509208     DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61057-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  62 in total

1.  Centrosome amplification and chromosomal instability in human and animal parthenogenetic cell lines.

Authors:  Tiziana A L Brevini; Georgia Pennarossa; Sara Maffei; Gianluca Tettamanti; Arianna Vanelli; Sara Isaac; Amir Eden; Sergio Ledda; Magda de Eguileor; Fulvio Gandolfi
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.739

2.  Twenty-four chromosome FISH in human IVF embryos reveals patterns of post-zygotic chromosome segregation and nuclear organisation.

Authors:  D Ioannou; K G L Fonseka; E J Meershoek; A R Thornhill; A Abogrein; M Ellis; D K Griffin
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  The utility of embryo banking in order to increase the number of embryos available for preimplantation genetic screening in advanced maternal age patients.

Authors:  John J Orris; Tyl H Taylor; Janice W Gilchrist; Susan V Hallowell; Michael J Glassner; J David Wininger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Initial maternal serum human chorionic gonadotropin levels in pregnancies achieved after assisted reproductive technology are higher after preimplantation genetic screening and after frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort.

Authors:  Elie Hobeika; Sonali Singh; Shaveta Malik; Eric S Knochenhauer; Michael L Traub
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Quality of embryos transferred and progesterone levels are the most important predictors of live birth after fresh embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Qianfang Cai; Fei Wan; Dina Appleby; Linli Hu; Hanwang Zhang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  A greater number of euploid blastocysts in a given cohort predicts excellent outcomes in single embryo transfer cycles.

Authors:  Scott Morin; Katherine Melzer-Ross; David McCulloh; Jamie Grifo; Santiago Munné
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  PGS-FISH in reproductive medicine and perspective directions for improvement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sandra Zamora; Ana Clavero; M Carmen Gonzalvo; Juan de Dios Luna Del Castillo; Jose Antonio Roldán-Nofuentes; Juan Mozas; Jose Antonio Castilla
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 8.  Preimplantation genetic screening: does it help or hinder IVF treatment and what is the role of the embryo?

Authors:  Kim Dao Ly; Ashok Agarwal; Zsolt Peter Nagy
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Euploidy in relation to blastocyst sex and morphology.

Authors:  Ange Wang; Jonathan Kort; Barry Behr; Lynn M Westphal
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Miscarriage rates after dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) supplementation in women with diminished ovarian reserve: a case control study.

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; Eddy Ryan; Andrea Weghofer; Sonia Blanco-Mejia; David H Barad
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.