Literature DB >> 25561156

A comparison of pregnancy outcomes between day 3 and day 5/6 embryo transfers: does day of embryo transfer really make a difference?

Susan M Maxwell1, Katherine Melzer-Ross, David H McCulloh, James A Grifo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if day of embryo transfer (ET) affects gestational age (GA) and/or birth weight (BW) at a single university fertility center that primarily performs day 5/6 ET.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 2392 singleton live births resulting from IVF/ICSI at a single large university fertility center from 2003 to 2012. Patients were stratified by day 3 or day 5/6 ET. Outcome variables included patient age, gravidity, prior miscarriages, prior assisted reproduction technology cycles, number of embryos transferred, number of single ET, infertility diagnosis, neonatal sex, GA at birth, and BW. Subanalyses were performed on subgroups of preterm infants. A comparison was made between the study data and the Society of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (SART) published data.
RESULTS: There was no difference in GA at birth (39 ± 2.1 weeks for day 3 ET, 39 ± 1.9 weeks for day 5/6 ET) or BW between ET groups (3308 ± 568 g for day 3 ET, 3268 ± 543 g for day 5/6 ET). There was also no difference in the number of preterm deliveries (8.5 % for day 3 ET vs. 10.8 % for day 5/6 ET). The day 5/6 ET study data had significantly fewer pre-term deliveries than the SART day 5/6 ET data.
CONCLUSION: In contrast to published SART data, GA and BW were not influenced by day of ET. Data may be more uniform at a single institution. Day 5/6 ET continues to offer improved pregnancy rates without compromising birth outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25561156      PMCID: PMC4354181          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-014-0404-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  24 in total

1.  Array CGH analysis shows that aneuploidy is not related to the number of embryos generated.

Authors:  Baris Ata; Brian Kaplan; Hal Danzer; Michael Glassner; Michael Opsahl; Seang Lin Tan; Santiago Munné
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 3.828

2.  Comprehensive chromosome screening is highly predictive of the reproductive potential of human embryos: a prospective, blinded, nonselection study.

Authors:  Richard T Scott; Kathleen Ferry; Jing Su; Xin Tao; Katherine Scott; Nathan R Treff
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Clinical application of comprehensive chromosomal screening at the blastocyst stage.

Authors:  William B Schoolcraft; Elpida Fragouli; John Stevens; Santiago Munne; Mandy G Katz-Jaffe; Dagan Wells
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Extended embryo culture and an increased risk of preterm delivery.

Authors:  Suleena Kansal Kalra; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Kurt T Barnhart; Christos Coutifaris
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Blastocyst culture selects for euploid embryos: comparison of blastomere and trophectoderm biopsies.

Authors:  Alexis Adler; Hsaio-Ling Lee; David H McCulloh; Esmeralda Ampeloquio; Melicia Clarke-Williams; Brooke Hodes Wertz; James Grifo
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.828

6.  Culture and transfer of human blastocysts increases implantation rates and reduces the need for multiple embryo transfers.

Authors:  D K Gardner; P Vella; M Lane; L Wagley; T Schlenker; W B Schoolcraft
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 7.  Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Demián Glujovsky; Debbie Blake; Cindy Farquhar; Ariel Bardach
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-07-11

8.  FISH reanalysis of inner cell mass and trophectoderm samples of previously array-CGH screened blastocysts shows high accuracy of diagnosis and no major diagnostic impact of mosaicism at the blastocyst stage.

Authors:  Antonio Capalbo; Graham Wright; Thomas Elliott; Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Laura Rienzi; Zsolt Peter Nagy
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Studies on the duration of egg transport by the human oviduct. II. Ovum location at various intervals following luteinizing hormone peak.

Authors:  H B Croxatto; M E Ortiz; S Díaz; R Hess; J Balmaceda; H D Croxatto
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1978-11-15       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study.

Authors:  Zhihong Yang; Jiaen Liu; Gary S Collins; Shala A Salem; Xiaohong Liu; Sarah S Lyle; Alison C Peck; E Scott Sills; Rifaat D Salem
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 2.009

View more
  7 in total

1.  The impact of paternal factors on cleavage stage and blastocyst development analyzed by time-lapse imaging-a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Anton Neyer; Martin Zintz; Astrid Stecher; Magnus Bach; Barbara Wirleitner; Nicolas H Zech; Pierre Vanderzwalmen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  A predictive model for high-quality blastocyst based on blastomere number, fragmentation, and symmetry.

Authors:  Cheng-He Yu; Ruo-Peng Zhang; Juan Li; Zhou-Cun A
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Effect of embryo and blastocyst transfer on the birthweight of live-born singletons from FET cycles.

Authors:  Junshun Fang; Lihua Zhu; Dong Li; Zhipeng Xu; Guijun Yan; Haixiang Sun; Ningyuan Zhang; Linjun Chen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Effect of mesenchymal stem cells and mouse embryonic fibroblasts on the development of preimplantation mouse embryos.

Authors:  Vera Maria Peters; David C Spray; Rosalia Mendez-Otero
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.416

5.  Birthweight in infants conceived through in vitro fertilization following blastocyst or cleavage-stage embryo transfer: a national registry study.

Authors:  Julia F Litzky; Sheree L Boulet; Navid Esfandiari; Yujia Zhang; Dmitry M Kissin; Regan N Theiler; Carmen J Marsit
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Comparative neonatal outcomes in singleton births from blastocyst transfers or cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xingling Wang; Mingze Du; Yichun Guan; Bijun Wang; Junwei Zhang; Zihua Liu
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 5.211

7.  Multivariate analysis of the factors associated with live births during in vitro fertilisation in Southeast Asia: a cross-sectional study of 104,015 in vitro fertilisation records in Taiwan.

Authors:  Hsi-Cheng Yu; Wen-May Rei; Shu-Ti Chiou; Chung-Yeh Deng
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.357

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.