Literature DB >> 23300043

Cochlear implant with a non-removable magnet: preliminary research at 3-T MRI.

F Dubrulle1, A Sufana Iancu, C Vincent, G Tourrel, O Ernst.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To perform preliminary tests in vitro and with healthy volunteers to determine the 3-T MRI compatibility of a cochlear implant with a non-removable magnet.
METHODS: In the in vitro phase, we tested six implants for temperature changes and internal malfunctioning. We measured the demagnetisation of 65 internal magnets with different tilt angles between the implant's magnetic field (bi) and the main magnetic field (b0). In the in vivo phase, we tested 28 operational implants attached to the scalps of volunteers with the head in three different positions.
RESULTS: The study did not find significant temperature changes or electronic malfunction in the implants tested in vitro. We found considerable demagnetisation of the cochlear implant magnets in the in vitro and in vivo testing influenced by the position of the magnet in the main magnetic field. We found that if the bi/b0 angle is <90°, there is no demagnetisation; if the bi/b0 angle is >90°, there is demagnetisation in almost 60 % of the cases. When the angle is around 90°, the risk of demagnetisation is low (6.6 %).
CONCLUSION: The preliminary results on cochlear implants with non-removable magnets indicate the need to maintain the contraindication of passage through 3-T MRI. KEY POINTS: • Magnetic resonance imaging can affect cochlear implants and vice versa. • Demagnetisation of cochlear implant correlates with the angle between bi and b0. • The position of the head in the MRI influences the demagnetisation. • Three-Tesla MRI for cochlear implants is still contraindicated. • However some future solutions are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23300043     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2760-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  19 in total

1.  [Clinical utilization of magnetic resonance imaging for patients with cochlear implants].

Authors:  W D Baumgartner; S Youssefzadeh; C Czerny; J Hamzavi; O Adunka; W Gstoettner
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2000-06-02       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 2.  Is magnetic resonance imaging still a contraindication in cochlear-implanted patients?

Authors:  Sebastien Schmerber; Emile Reyt; Jean-Pierre Lavieille
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2003-01-16       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T after cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Benjamin T Crane; Barbara Gottschalk; Michael Kraut; Nafi Aygun; John K Niparko
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 4.  MRI compatibility issues in otology.

Authors:  Michael H Fritsch; Kristine M Mosier
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.064

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging with the Digisonic SP Neurelec cochlear implant.

Authors:  C Vincent; I Ruzza; F M Vaneecloo; F Dubrulle
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Reversing the polarity of a cochlear implant magnet after magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ju Hyun Jeon; Mi Ran Bae; Jae Won Chang; Jae Young Choi
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 1.863

7.  Cochlear implants: in vitro investigation of electromagnetic interference at MR imaging--compatibility and safety aspects.

Authors:  C Teissl; C Kremser; E S Hochmair; I J Hochmair-Desoyer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  MR compatibility of Med EL cochlear implants: clinical testing at 1.0 T.

Authors:  S Youssefzadeh; W Baumgartner; R Dorffner; W Gstöttner; S Trattnig
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Absence of radiofrequency heating from auditory implants during magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  C K Chou; J A McDougall; K W Can
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.010

10.  Cochlear implant magnet displacement during magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Sophie Deneuve; Nathalie Loundon; Nicolas Leboulanger; Isabelle Rouillon; Erea Noel Garabedian
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  2 in total

1.  Significant Artifact Reduction at 1.5T and 3T MRI by the Use of a Cochlear Implant with Removable Magnet: An Experimental Human Cadaver Study.

Authors:  Franca Wagner; Wilhelm Wimmer; Lars Leidolt; Mattheus Vischer; Stefan Weder; Roland Wiest; Georgios Mantokoudis; Marco D Caversaccio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Two-phase survey on the frequency of use and safety of MRI for hearing implant recipients.

Authors:  Paul van de Heyning; Griet Mertens; Vedat Topsakal; Ruben de Brito; Wilhelm Wimmer; Marco D Caversaccio; Stefan Dazert; Stefan Volkenstein; Mario Zernotti; Lorne S Parnes; Hinrich Staecker; Iain A Bruce; Gunesh Rajan; Marcus Atlas; Peter Friedland; Piotr H Skarzynski; Serafima Sugarova; Vladislav Kuzovkov; Abdulrahman Hagr; Robert Mlynski; Joachim Schmutzhard; Shin-Ichi Usami; Luis Lassaletta; Javier Gavilán; Benoit Godey; Christopher H Raine; Rudolf Hagen; Georg M Sprinzl; Kevin Brown; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Eva Karltorp
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.503

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.