Literature DB >> 8554632

Absence of radiofrequency heating from auditory implants during magnetic resonance imaging.

C K Chou1, J A McDougall, K W Can.   

Abstract

The possibility of tissue heating due to an auditory brainstem implant (ABI) or a modified cochlear implant (CI) during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head was tested on a full-sized human phantom using a realistic phantom head consisting of simulated skull, brain, and muscle. Dielectric properties of the brain, muscle, and bone materials were similar to those of human tissues at 64 MHz. The body consisted of homogeneous phantom muscle enclosed in a human-shaped fiberglass shell. Thermographic and fiber-optic temperature measurements were conducted to reveal any heating. Thermograms of sagittal, frontal, and horizontal planes of the head with the ABI and CI electrodes were taken immediately before and after a 26 min MRI scan. The MRI sequence was set at 94 excitations and 25 ms echo time to induce maximum radiofrequency heating, as suggested by the General Electric Company. The difference of these two thermograms gives the heating results. In two uncut phantom heads. Teflon tubes were placed along the implanted ABI and CI, and temperature data were recorded via fiber-optic probes before, during, and after the MRI. Results showed no observable heating associated with the ABI and the modified CI during worst-case MRI of the head.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8554632     DOI: 10.1002/bem.2250160507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics        ISSN: 0197-8462            Impact factor:   2.010


  5 in total

1.  MR imaging-related heating of deep brain stimulation electrodes: in vitro study.

Authors:  Daniel A Finelli; Ali R Rezai; Paul M Ruggieri; Jean A Tkach; John A Nyenhuis; Greg Hrdlicka; Ashwini Sharan; Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez; Paul H Stypulkowski; Frank G Shellock
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Electrode insertion depth in cochlear implantees estimated during surgery, on plain film radiographs and with electrode function testing.

Authors:  Robert H R Bettman; Adriaan F van Olphen; Frans W Zonneveld; Egbert H Huizing
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2003-05-23       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Is magnetic resonance imaging still a contraindication in cochlear-implanted patients?

Authors:  Sebastien Schmerber; Emile Reyt; Jean-Pierre Lavieille
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2003-01-16       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Cochlear implant with a non-removable magnet: preliminary research at 3-T MRI.

Authors:  F Dubrulle; A Sufana Iancu; C Vincent; G Tourrel; O Ernst
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Significant Artifact Reduction at 1.5T and 3T MRI by the Use of a Cochlear Implant with Removable Magnet: An Experimental Human Cadaver Study.

Authors:  Franca Wagner; Wilhelm Wimmer; Lars Leidolt; Mattheus Vischer; Stefan Weder; Roland Wiest; Georgios Mantokoudis; Marco D Caversaccio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.