Literature DB >> 18297299

Magnetic resonance imaging with the Digisonic SP Neurelec cochlear implant.

C Vincent1, I Ruzza, F M Vaneecloo, F Dubrulle.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to evaluate the MR compatibility of the Neurelec Digisonic SP cochlear implant by performing in vitro and in vivo tests. All tests were performed on 1.5 T machine. Torque and force were measured to observe a potential displacement of the internal receiver. Demagnetisation of the internal magnet was monitored inside the MRI scanner and outside the MRI scanner (in the MRI room). Potential-induced voltage on electrodes was measured in vitro, performing the usual MR sequences. Heating around the internal receiver was measured after the same MR sequences. Following in vitro tests, in vivo MR imaging (brain and posterior fossa MRI) was performed to evaluate the induced signal void and geometrical distortion. In vivo test was performed with one volunteer who had a cochlear implant device fixed to the surface of the skin with a bandage. All the in vitro tests were in compliance with standard EN 45502-2-3 relating to Cochlear Implants. In vivo MRI scans demonstrated an image distortion for spin echo sequences of 7 cm maximum around the internal magnet. Magnetic resonance imaging with the Neurelec Digisonic SP cochlear implant is possible with no measurable adverse effects for either the patient or the device. Image artefact around the internal magnet, however, is unavoidable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18297299     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-007-0576-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  8 in total

1.  Safety study of the Cochlear Nucleus 24 device with internal magnet in the 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging scanner.

Authors:  Samuel P Gubbels; Sean O McMenomey
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  MRI safety of Med-El C40/C40+ cochlear implants.

Authors:  E S Hochmair
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2001-09

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility testing of the Clarion 1.2 cochlear implant.

Authors:  B P Weber; J E Goldring; T Santogrossi; H Koestler; G Tziviskos; R Battmer; T h Lenarz
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1998-09

4.  Cochlear implants: in vitro investigation of electromagnetic interference at MR imaging--compatibility and safety aspects.

Authors:  C Teissl; C Kremser; E S Hochmair; I J Hochmair-Desoyer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Evaluation of MRI compatibility of the modified nucleus multichannel auditory brainstem and cochlear implants.

Authors:  J W Heller; D E Brackmann; D L Tucci; J A Nyenhuis; C K Chou
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1996-09

6.  MR compatibility of Med EL cochlear implants: clinical testing at 1.0 T.

Authors:  S Youssefzadeh; W Baumgartner; R Dorffner; W Gstöttner; S Trattnig
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  Clinical application of magnetic resonance imaging in 30 cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  W D Baumgartner; S Youssefzadeh; J Hamzavi; C Czerny; W Gstoettner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on internal magnet strength in Med-El Combi 40+ cochlear implants.

Authors:  P Ashley Wackym; Michelle A Michel; Robert W Prost; Kristin L Banks; Christina L Runge-Samuelson; Jill B Firszt
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.325

  8 in total
  11 in total

1.  Cochlear implant with a non-removable magnet: preliminary research at 3-T MRI.

Authors:  F Dubrulle; A Sufana Iancu; C Vincent; G Tourrel; O Ernst
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  [Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with magnetic hearing implants: overview and procedural management].

Authors:  S Nospes; W Mann; A Keilmann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Effects and consequences of Digisonic SP cochlear implant on radiotherapy planning.

Authors:  Nicolas Guevara; Ibrahim Atean; David Benoit; Yoann Pointreau; Gaëlle Angellier; Serge Marcie; Sonia Saaï; Dan Gnansia; Juliette Thariat
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Neuroimaging with near-infrared spectroscopy demonstrates speech-evoked activity in the auditory cortex of deaf children following cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Alexander B G Sevy; Heather Bortfeld; Theodore J Huppert; Michael S Beauchamp; Ross E Tonini; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 5.  [MRI in patients with auditory implants equipped with implanted magnets-an update : Overview and procedural management].

Authors:  S Nospes; M A Brockmann; A Läßig
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Minimally invasive pocket technique for the implantation of Neurelec Digisonic SP cochlear implant.

Authors:  Martine Vanlommel; Samuel Lipski; Pierre Dolhen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compatibility of the Polymer-based Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  Jin Ho Kim; Kyou Sik Min; Soon Kwan An; Joon Soo Jeong; Sang Beom Jun; Min Hyoung Cho; Young-Don Son; Zang-Hee Cho; Sung June Kim
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.372

8.  Significant Artifact Reduction at 1.5T and 3T MRI by the Use of a Cochlear Implant with Removable Magnet: An Experimental Human Cadaver Study.

Authors:  Franca Wagner; Wilhelm Wimmer; Lars Leidolt; Mattheus Vischer; Stefan Weder; Roland Wiest; Georgios Mantokoudis; Marco D Caversaccio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging after cochlear implants.

Authors:  Naif Bawazeer; Hella Vuong; Sophie Riehm; Francis Veillon; Anne Charpiot
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2018-11-09

10.  Cochlear implantation in children with white matter lesions: Prediction of hearing outcomes by multiple regression analysis.

Authors:  Sufang Wang; Yannan Wang; Yongxin Li; Yanyan Wei; Fugen Han; Hongbo Ren; Ying Xu; Yanhong Cui
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.