Literature DB >> 18667941

Cochlear implant magnet displacement during magnetic resonance imaging.

Sophie Deneuve1, Nathalie Loundon, Nicolas Leboulanger, Isabelle Rouillon, Erea Noel Garabedian.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Magnet displacement is a rare but possible complication in patients with cochlear implants. We report 1 case in a young child that occurred during magnetic resonance imaging scanning, despite precautionary measures taken by the surgeon and the radiographer. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective case report.
SETTING: This case is presented by the ENT Department of Armand Trousseau Paediatrics Hospital, Paris, France. PATIENT: An 8-year-old child, implanted with a Freedom Contour Nucleus cochlear implant, was referred for a 1.5-T cerebral magnetic resonance imaging because of a progressive neurologic disorder.
CONCLUSION: This rare complication underlines the importance of risk information and preventive measures required, even in case of compatible devices, for performing a magnetic resonance imaging examination in patients wearing a cochlear implant with removable magnet.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18667941     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181825695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  15 in total

1.  Magnet displacement: a rare complication following cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Corina Wild; John Allum; Rudolf Probst; Daniel Abels; Claude Fischer; Daniel Bodmer
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Cochlear implant with a non-removable magnet: preliminary research at 3-T MRI.

Authors:  F Dubrulle; A Sufana Iancu; C Vincent; G Tourrel; O Ernst
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  [Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with magnetic hearing implants: overview and procedural management].

Authors:  S Nospes; W Mann; A Keilmann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Focused tight dressing does not prevent cochlear implant magnet migration under 1.5 Tesla MRI.

Authors:  D Cuda; A Murri; G Succo
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.124

5.  Neuroimaging with near-infrared spectroscopy demonstrates speech-evoked activity in the auditory cortex of deaf children following cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Alexander B G Sevy; Heather Bortfeld; Theodore J Huppert; Michael S Beauchamp; Ross E Tonini; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  A repot of surgical complications in a series of 262 consecutive pediatric cochlear implantations in iran.

Authors:  Mohammad Ajallouyean; Susan Amirsalari; Jaleh Yousefi; Mohammad-Ali Raeesi; Shokofeh Radfar; Mahdieh Hassanalifard
Journal:  Iran J Pediatr       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 0.364

7.  Cochlear implantation in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 and patients with vestibular schwannoma in the only hearing ear.

Authors:  Erika Celis-Aguilar; Luis Lassaletta; Javier Gavilán
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-02-28

8.  Imaging in cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Antje Aschendorff
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-04-26

9.  Significant Artifact Reduction at 1.5T and 3T MRI by the Use of a Cochlear Implant with Removable Magnet: An Experimental Human Cadaver Study.

Authors:  Franca Wagner; Wilhelm Wimmer; Lars Leidolt; Mattheus Vischer; Stefan Weder; Roland Wiest; Georgios Mantokoudis; Marco D Caversaccio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging after cochlear implants.

Authors:  Naif Bawazeer; Hella Vuong; Sophie Riehm; Francis Veillon; Anne Charpiot
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2018-11-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.