Chemically modified proteins are invaluable tools for studying the molecular details of biological processes, and they also hold great potential as new therapeutic agents. Several methods have been developed for the site-specific modification of proteins, one of the most widely used being expressed protein ligation (EPL) in which a recombinant α-thioester is ligated to an N-terminal Cys-containing peptide. Despite the widespread use of EPL, the generation and isolation of the required recombinant protein α-thioesters remain challenging. We describe here a new method for the preparation and purification of recombinant protein α-thioesters using engineered versions of naturally split DnaE inteins. This family of autoprocessing enzymes is closely related to the inteins currently used for protein α-thioester generation, but they feature faster kinetics and are split into two inactive polypeptides that need to associate to become active. Taking advantage of the strong affinity between the two split intein fragments, we devised a streamlined procedure for the purification and generation of protein α-thioesters from cell lysates and applied this strategy for the semisynthesis of a variety of proteins including an acetylated histone and a site-specifically modified monoclonal antibody.
Chemically modified proteins are invaluable tools for studying the molecular details of biological processes, and they also hold great potential as new therapeutic agents. Several methods have been developed for the site-specific modification of proteins, one of the most widely used being expressed protein ligation (EPL) in which a recombinant α-thioester is ligated to an N-terminal Cys-containing peptide. Despite the widespread use of EPL, the generation and isolation of the required recombinant protein α-thioesters remain challenging. We describe here a new method for the preparation and purification of recombinant protein α-thioesters using engineered versions of naturally split DnaE inteins. This family of autoprocessing enzymes is closely related to the inteins currently used for protein α-thioester generation, but they feature faster kinetics and are split into two inactive polypeptides that need to associate to become active. Taking advantage of the strong affinity between the two split intein fragments, we devised a streamlined procedure for the purification and generation of protein α-thioesters from cell lysates and applied this strategy for the semisynthesis of a variety of proteins including an acetylated histone and a site-specifically modified monoclonal antibody.
The chemical modification of proteins
is an established tool for
studying the structure, function, and regulation of this class of
biopolymer.[1] Moreover, in recent years,
a great deal of effort has been directed toward the modification of
proteins for therapeutic applications.[2] Traditionally, protein conjugation chemistries have exploited the
reactivity of surface-exposed nucleophilic amino acids, such as cysteine
or lysine, however, these methods typically result in heterogeneous
mixtures of products, which can complicate biological studies or efficacious
medicinal applications. To address this concern, several strategies
have been developed for the site-specific modification of proteins,
ranging from total chemical synthesis (usually via native chemical
ligation, NCL)[3] to the genetic incorporation
of unnatural amino acids[4] or bio-orthogonal
functional groups.[5] In between these two
extremes lie a variety of semisynthetic approaches.[5−7]The most
widely used protein semisynthesis technique is an extension
of NCL termed expressed protein ligation (EPL) in which a recombinant
protein α-thioester building block is ligated to a synthetic
molecule equipped with a 1,2-aminothiol moiety (most commonly an N-terminal
Cys-containing peptide) through the formation of a native peptide
bond[8,9] (Scheme 1). Since
its inception, EPL has been applied to a wide variety of proteins,
including enzymes,[10] ion channels,[11] transcription factors,[12] transmembrane receptors,[13] and antibodies[14] (for reviews see refs (15 and 16)). One of the basic requirements
of EPL is a thioester group at the C-terminus of a recombinant protein.
This reactive handle is introduced by exploiting a process known as
protein splicing (Scheme 1), which is mediated
by an autoprocessing domain called an intein.[16,17] Protein splicing typically takes place through the formation of
one or more protein thioester intermediates, which ultimately resolve
to form a native peptide bond between the sequences flanking the intein
(referred to as N- and C-exteins). By using appropriate intein mutants,
it is possible to intercept these intermediates with exogenous thiols,
resulting in an N-extein of choice being cleaved from the mutant intein
as a reactive α-thioester derivative suitable for chemical ligation.[8,18]
Scheme 1
Protein Splicing (A), trans-Splicing (B) and EPL (C)
ExN and
ExC represent N- and C-exteins, respectively. IntN and IntC represent N- and C-intein fragments, respectively.
Protein Splicing (A), trans-Splicing (B) and EPL (C)
ExN and
ExC represent N- and C-exteins, respectively. IntN and IntC represent N- and C-intein fragments, respectively.Despite the many successes of EPL, the approach
often suffers from
low overall efficiency due to complications associated with the generation
of protein α-thioesters. In particular, fusions to inteins are,
to varying extents, susceptible to premature extein cleavage, both in vivo and during initial purification from cell lysates,
which reduces the isolated yield of the intein fusion needed for the
subsequent thiolysis step.[19] Importantly,
the cleaved extein side-product is unreactive toward EPL, and its
separation from the desired α-thioester or the ligation product
is often difficult for large proteins, such as antibodies.[19] To compound matters, the thiolysis reaction
itself can be slow and inefficient, further strengthening the need
to develop customized purification regimes, involving multiple chromatographic
steps, to isolate the desired product from complex mixtures.[20−22] Collectively, these technical issues mean that a considerable investment
in time and resources is usually required before a semisynthetic protein
is obtained in useful quantities.Streamlined EPL using split inteins. (A)
Schematic of the procedure
for the isolation of an α-thioester derivative of a protein
of interest (POI) using engineered split intein fragments (IntN and IntC). EPL can be performed in a one-pot fashion
during thiolysis from the split intein or immediately after elution,
without need of any further purification. (B) Sequences of NpuC (WT) and the NpuCAA mutant used on the split intein
column. Catalytic residues mutated in NpuCAA are shown
in bold, and the linker sequence added for immobilization onto the
solid support is underlined. Sequences are numbered according to the
intein sequence alignment shown in Figure S2.To overcome the various drawbacks associated with
the intein thiolysis
process central to EPL, we envisioned an alternative strategy based
on naturally occurring split inteins. Unlike inteins used in standard
EPL, which are contiguous polypeptides that catalyze protein splicing
in cis, split inteins consist of two discrete polypeptides,
herein termed IntN and IntC, which, upon association,
catalyze protein splicing in trans (protein trans-splicing, PTS, Scheme 1).[23] Split inteins have two important properties
that make them attractive for an improved EPL strategy. First, cognate
IntN and IntC pairs often bind tightly to one
another; dissociation constants in the low nanomolar range, reflecting
extremely fast on-rates, have been reported for members of the naturally
split DnaE inteins from cyanobacteria.[24,25] This ability
of split inteins to self-associate has recently been exploited by
Lu et al. as part of a traceless protein purification system, in this
case using an artificially split intein pair.[26] The potential utility of split inteins in EPL is further enhanced
by the remarkable splicing efficiency of some members of the family.[27,28] For instance, many of the split DnaE inteins have half-lives for
the splicing reaction of less than a minute, as compared to several
hours in the case of the cis-splicing inteins commonly
used in EPL.[27,28] Moreover, recent mechanistic
investigations indicate that these “ultrafast” DnaE
inteins have a highly activated N-terminal splice junction, making
them superior reagents for protein α-thioester generation.[28] Given the unique properties of split inteins,
in particular, the ultrafast split DnaE inteins, we conceived the
integrated protein modification system shown in Figure 1 in which the split intein association is employed both to
purify the desired protein from complex biological mixtures and to
trigger the generation of a desired protein α-thioester for
EPL. In principle, this complementation system should address the
major issues attendant to the standard EPL protocol, including premature
cleavage of the intein, which cannot occur in the case of a split
intein fragment absent its cognate partner.[29,30]
Figure 1
Streamlined EPL using split inteins. (A)
Schematic of the procedure
for the isolation of an α-thioester derivative of a protein
of interest (POI) using engineered split intein fragments (IntN and IntC). EPL can be performed in a one-pot fashion
during thiolysis from the split intein or immediately after elution,
without need of any further purification. (B) Sequences of NpuC (WT) and the NpuCAA mutant used on the split intein
column. Catalytic residues mutated in NpuCAA are shown
in bold, and the linker sequence added for immobilization onto the
solid support is underlined. Sequences are numbered according to the
intein sequence alignment shown in Figure S2.
Results and Discussion
Split Intein Mediated Thiolysis and EPL
To implement
our system, we designed a mutant of the ultrafast (Npu) split DnaE intein suitable for efficient
α-thioester generation. Specifically, we mutated the catalytic
C-terminal residue in the IntC fragment (Asn137) and the
first residue in the C-extein (Cys+1) to Ala, to allow for efficient
build up of the desired splicing intermediates upon exposure to an
N-extein-NpuN fusion (Figure 1).
Preliminary studies showed that mixing N-extein-NpuN fusions
(where N-extein corresponded to various model proteins) with the mutant
NpuC (NpuCAA) led to highly efficient N-extein
α-thioester formation in a thiol-dependent manner (Figures S3 and S4). Importantly, only very low
levels of intein cleavage (i.e., unwanted hydrolysis) were observed
in the absence of thiols, thereby fulfilling a requirement of our
integrated strategy.Encouraged by these results, we adapted
the system for the one-pot purification and generation of C-terminally
modified proteins by taking full advantage of the strong and specific
interaction between the split intein fragments. Accordingly, the NpuCAA peptide was immobilized on a solid support through a unique
Cys residue engineered within its C-extein region (Figure S5). The resulting NpuCAA column (hereafter
referred to as IntC column) was then evaluated as an affinity-modification
resin. Three test proteins maltose binding protein (MBP), ubiquitin
(Ub), and protein histidine phosphatase type 1 (PHPT1) were genetically
fused to NpuN and expressed in . In each case, cells were lysed, and the soluble
fraction was loaded onto the IntC column to allow binding
of the NpuN tagged protein to the immobilized NpuCAA. After a brief incubation (∼ 5 min at rt) the column was
extensively washed to remove contaminants, and thiolysis was triggered
by addition of a buffer containing the thiol, mercaptoethansulfonate
(MES). In all three cases, the desired α-thioester protein eluted
from the IntC column with high recovery (75–95%)
and high purity (∼95% as determined by RP-HPLC and mass spectrometry)
(Figure 2). Total isolated yields of purified
protein α-thioesters varied from one protein to another and
ranged from 2.5 mg (per L of bacterial culture) for Ub-MES to 40 mg
for MBP-MES. The calculated loading capacity of the IntC column used in these experiments was 3–6 mg of protein per
mL of beads (0.12 μmols/mL), but higher or lower loadings could
easily be achieved by modifying the amount of NpuC-AA immobilized
on the solid support. Furthermore, we showed that the IntC column could be regenerated and reused at least 5 times with only
minimal loss of capacity (Figures S11 and S12). The utility of the α-thioester derivatives of Ub, MBP, and
PHPT1 obtained from the column was demonstrated by ligating each of
them to an N-terminal Cys-containing fluorescent peptide (CGK(Fl))
to give the corresponding semisynthetic products in excellent yield
(Figure S10). Importantly, one-pot thiolysis/ligation
reactions could be carried out, which allowed us to obtain a site-specifically
modified protein directly from cell lysates without isolating the
intermediate thioester (Figure 3).
Figure 2
Purification
of α-thioester proteins expressed in . (A) MBP, (B) PHPT1, and (C) Ub mercaptoethansulfonate
(MES) α-thioesters were purified in one step from cell lysates using the IntC column.
The purifications were monitored by coomassie stained SDS-PAGE analysis
(top) (inp: input, FT: column flow-through, W1-3: washes, E1-4: elutions,
and bds: resin beads). RP-HPLC (detection at 214 nm) and ESI-TOF MS
analysis of the eluted fractions (bottom left and right, respectively)
confirmed the identity of all protein α-thioesters and indicated
high purity.
Figure 3
One-pot purification/ligation of ubiquitin to the H-CGK(Fluorescein)-NH2 peptide (CGK(Fl)). Ub-NpuN from cell lysates was bound to the IntC column, as shown in Figure 2, and after removal
of contaminants through extensive washes, intein cleavage and ligation
were triggered by addition of 200 mM MES and 1 mM CGK(Fl) peptide.
Coomassie stained SDS-PAGE analysis and in gel fluorescence of the
purification/ligation (left). RP-HPLC (detection at 214 and 440 nm)
and ESI-TOF MS (right) of the eluted fractions confirm the desired
ligated protein was obtained in one step directly from cell lysates
with a ligation yield close to 95% (quantified by RP-HPLC).
Purification
of α-thioester proteins expressed in . (A) MBP, (B) PHPT1, and (C) Ub mercaptoethansulfonate
(MES) α-thioesters were purified in one step from cell lysates using the IntC column.
The purifications were monitored by coomassie stained SDS-PAGE analysis
(top) (inp: input, FT: column flow-through, W1-3: washes, E1-4: elutions,
and bds: resin beads). RP-HPLC (detection at 214 nm) and ESI-TOF MS
analysis of the eluted fractions (bottom left and right, respectively)
confirmed the identity of all protein α-thioesters and indicated
high purity.One-pot purification/ligation of ubiquitin to the H-CGK(Fluorescein)-NH2 peptide (CGK(Fl)). Ub-NpuN from cell lysates was bound to the IntC column, as shown in Figure 2, and after removal
of contaminants through extensive washes, intein cleavage and ligation
were triggered by addition of 200 mM MES and 1 mM CGK(Fl) peptide.
Coomassie stained SDS-PAGE analysis and in gel fluorescence of the
purification/ligation (left). RP-HPLC (detection at 214 and 440 nm)
and ESI-TOF MS (right) of the eluted fractions confirm the desired
ligated protein was obtained in one step directly from cell lysates
with a ligation yield close to 95% (quantified by RP-HPLC).
Dependance on the Identity of the C-Terminal Amino Acid
An attractive feature of EPL is that it can allow for the preparation
of site-specifically modified proteins in a virtually traceless manner.
This is contingent on the ability to efficiently generate recombinant
protein α-thioesters when any of the 20 proteinogenic amino
acids are present at the C-terminus of the protein. The activity of
split inteins is known to be sensitive to the identity of the amino
acids immediately flanking the splice junction.[28,31,32] Thus, we were eager to test the generality
of our strategy and asked whether we could generate α-thioesters
of all 20 amino acids, using ubiquitin as the N-extein template. Twenty
Ub-NpuN fusion proteins were individually expressed in and purified over the IntC column
as before. Thiol-induced cleavage yields from the solid support were
determined by SDS-PAGE analysis of the eluted and resin beads fractions,
and levels of competing side reactions (mainly hydrolysis) were measured
by RP-HPLC and ESI-TOF MS. The results clearly show that for most
amino acids >60% of the bound proteins were recovered after MES
treatment.
Furthermore, 80–95% of the eluted material was the desired
α-thioester product. The only exceptions were Pro and Glu, for
which recovery were 49 and 50%, respectively (Figure 4). The Asn mutant displayed high levels of cleavage from the
split intein, but almost no α-thioester could be isolated due
to side-chain cyclization to form a C-terminal succinimide. A second
problematic residue was Asp, for which we observed some premature
cleavage during initial binding to the IntC resin. Moreover,
RP-HPLC analysis of the eluted fractions upon thiolysis revealed two
species with the molecular weight of the desired α-thioester.
These results were not wholly unexpected, as Asp is known to cleave
prematurely from contiguous inteins through side-chain cyclization,[33,34] and its α-thioesters have been reported to migrate to the
side-chain carboxylate yielding mixtures of α- and β-isomers.[35] These minor constraints aside, it is clear from
these studies that our streamlined EPL system is compatible when the
majority of amino acids are present as the last residue in the protein
of interest.
Figure 4
Effect of C-terminal amino acid identity on α-thioester
formation.
The 20 mutants of the protein Ub-X-NpuN were expressed
in varying the identity of
the C-terminal amino acid of Ub (X) from the WT Gly to all other proteinogenic
amino acids. Thiol-induced cleavage yields from the IntC column were calculated from the SDS-PAGE analysis of the eluted
fractions and left over resin beads. Ratios of α-thioester vs
side products were determined from RP-HPLC and ESI-TOF MS analysis
of the eluted fractions. The major competing reaction for all amino
acids was hydrolysis with the exception of Asn for which its succinimide
form was isolated instead. * See main text for a discussion on the
problems associated with Asp. Error bars ± SD (n = 3).
Effect of C-terminal amino acid identity on α-thioester
formation.
The 20 mutants of the protein Ub-X-NpuN were expressed
in varying the identity of
the C-terminal amino acid of Ub (X) from the WT Gly to all other proteinogenic
amino acids. Thiol-induced cleavage yields from the IntC column were calculated from the SDS-PAGE analysis of the eluted
fractions and left over resin beads. Ratios of α-thioester vs
side products were determined from RP-HPLC and ESI-TOF MS analysis
of the eluted fractions. The major competing reaction for all amino
acids was hydrolysis with the exception of Asn for which its succinimide
form was isolated instead. * See main text for a discussion on the
problems associated with Asp. Error bars ± SD (n = 3).
Thioester Formation under Denaturing Conditions
Next
we investigated if our system was compatible with denaturing conditions.
Protein semisynthesis frequently requires the preparation of protein
fragments, which are often poorly behaved and need to be purified
in the presence of strong chaotropic agents. We first confirmed that
the model protein Ub-NpuN could bind the IntC column in the presence of 2 and 4 M urea and that the corresponding
Ub α-thioester could be generated with similar yields as obtained
under native conditions (Figure S14). This
is consistent with a previous study, which demonstrated Npu DnaE could
splice in the presence of high concentration of denaturants.[27] We then turned to a more challenging target,
namely a fragment of histone H2B (residues 1–116), a polypeptide
that is prone to aggregation and difficult to generate as an α-thioester
derivative using standard EPL procedures.[36] We expressed human histone H2B(1–116) fused to NpuN in , extracted it from inclusion
bodies in 6 M urea, and diluted it to 2 M urea prior to loading on
the IntC-intein column. The incubation was performed for
3 h at pH 6.0 to maximize binding while avoiding premature cleavage
through hydrolysis. The pH was then raised to 7.2, and thiolysis was
carried out for 36 h at rt (note that the presence of the denaturant
slows down the thiolysis rate). Using these conditions, hH2B(1–116)-MES
was obtained in excellent purity (>90% by RP-HPLC) and isolated
yield
(∼20 mg per L of culture). This represents a significant improvement
over previous protocols which afford less protein (4 mg per L of culture)
and require the use of multiple chromatographic purification steps
including RP-HPLC.[36] Importantly, the hH2B(1–116)-MES
thioester obtained from the IntC column could be directly
used in EPL reactions without further purification. Accordingly, we
successfully ligated the protein to a hH2B(117–125) peptide
containing an acetylated Lys at position 120[37] to yield semisynthetic hH2B-K120Ac (Figure 5).
Figure 5
Semisynthesis of hH2B-K120Ac under denaturing conditions. (A) Coomassie
stained SDS-PAGE analysis of hH2B(1–116) α-thioester
generation in the presence of 2 M urea (sup: cell lysate supernatant,
trit: 1% triton wash of the inclusion bodies, inp: solubilized inclusion
bodies used as input for the IntC column). E1–E3
were collected after 18 h of incubation with MES and E4–E6
after an additional 18 h. E1–E6 were pooled, concentrated to
150 μM, and ligated to the peptide H-CVTK(Ac)YTSAK-OH at 1 mM
for 3 h at rt. (B) RP-HPLC (left) of the ligation reaction mixture
and MS (right) of the ligated hH2B-K120Ac product.
Semisynthesis of hH2B-K120Ac under denaturing conditions. (A) Coomassie
stained SDS-PAGE analysis of hH2B(1–116) α-thioester
generation in the presence of 2 M urea (sup: cell lysate supernatant,
trit: 1% triton wash of the inclusion bodies, inp: solubilized inclusion
bodies used as input for the IntC column). E1–E3
were collected after 18 h of incubation with MES and E4–E6
after an additional 18 h. E1–E6 were pooled, concentrated to
150 μM, and ligated to the peptide H-CVTK(Ac)YTSAK-OH at 1 mM
for 3 h at rt. (B) RP-HPLC (left) of the ligation reaction mixture
and MS (right) of the ligated hH2B-K120Ac product.
Site-Specific Modification of a Monoclonal Antibody
Finally, we tested our streamlined EPL methodology for the modification
of a monoclonal antibody. The site-specific modification of antibodies
has become highly desirable in the area of biopharmaceuticals and
diagnostics.[38,39] Currently, most commercially
utilized methods to conjugate cargo to antibodies are relatively nonspecific
and result in polydisperse mixtures that may vary from batch-to-batch.
Since this heterogeneity can adversely affect both efficacy and safety
of the conjugate, attention has turned toward technologies that afford
site-specifically modified antibodies.[14,40−44] Indeed, protein semisynthesis via standard EPL and PTS has recently
been used to generate monoclonal antibody conjugates with full activity.[14] Given this, we were eager to see whether our
streamlined EPL process could be used in the facile generation of
antibody conjugates. As a model immunoglobulin (IgG) for our studies,
we used an antibody against the DEC205 receptor, a C-type lectin found
predominantly on dendritic cells.[45] Accordingly,
we designed a construct in which NpuN was fused to the
C-terminus of the heavy chain of the antibody (αDEC205-NpuN). Initial expression tests of αDEC205-NpuN in 293T cells resulted in very low levels of the antibody being
secreted (Figure 6A). We have observed previously
that the identity of the IntN can have an effect on expression
levels of its fusions.[28] Consequently,
we asked whether we could obtain higher levels of secreted αDEC205-IntN by varying the identity of the intein N-fragment. Several
new αDEC205-IntN constructs were generated in which
IntN corresponded to the N-fragment of a series of ultrafast
split DnaE inteins, namely, Ava, Csp, Cra, Cwa, Mcht, Oli, and Ter.
We also tested an NpuN mutant (C-S) where the noncatalytic
cysteines, Cys28 and Cys59, were mutated to Ser, to determine whether
these residues influence secretion and maturation of the IgG tetramer
(Figure 6A). Importantly, each of the IntN fragments in this set can cross-react with the C-fragment
of Npu without significant loss of splicing efficiency.[28] Thus, the IntC column already in
hand is compatible with all of these αDEC205-IntN fusions. The contiguous Mxe GyrA intein was also fused to αDEC205
to test whether the use of N-intein fragments negatively affected
expression levels compared to a full-length intein. An expression
screen of this αDEC205-IntN library was performed
in 293T cells, revealing that the AvaN and CspN fusions reproducibly exhibited higher expression levels than the
other N-inteins, with the former being the best. Indeed, the expression
levels of the αDEC-AvaN construct were at least as
good as the αDEC-GyrA construct. Based on this, the αDEC205-AvaN fusion was chosen and purified over the IntC column
in an analogous manner to that of the soluble proteins described above
(Figure 6B). Elutions from the column contained
the thiolyzed αDEC205, which was subsequently ligated to the
CGK(Fl) peptide (Figure 6C). Size exclusion
chromatography (SEC) coupled to multiple angle light scattering (MALS)
analysis confirmed that the antibody retained its tetrameric folded
state after thiolysis and ligation (Figure 6D). We also performed MS analysis of the deglycosylated and fully
reduced antibody, which confirmed the formation of a stable, nonreducible
amide bond between the αDEC205 heavy chain and the fluorescent
peptide with a 75% yield (Figure 6E). Importantly,
we demonstrated that the semisynthetic αDEC-CGK(Fl) retains
its ability to bind the DEC205 receptor to the same extent as a control
αDEC205, previously shown to be fully functional in
vivo(46) (Figure 7). Binding of αDEC-CGK(Fl) to the DEC205 receptor could
be monitored not only by flow cytometry using an antimouse IgG secondary
antibody (Figure 7) but also through the site-specifically
incorporated fluorescein (Figure S20).
Figure 6
Purification
of a monoclonal antibody α-thioester using a
split intein and its site-specific modification. (A) Test expression
of αDEC205 genetically fused to the contiguous Mxe GyrA intein
and different split DnaE inteins through the C-terminus of its heavy
chain (HC). Western blot of 293T cell supernatants of several αDEC205-Int
fusions using an antibody against mouse IgG. A loading control is
shown below. (B) Purification of αDEC205-MES thioester using
the split intein column. (C) Elution fractions containing αDEC205-MES
were concentrated to 20 μM and ligated to the CGK(Fl) fluorescent
peptide at 1 mM for 48 h at rt. (D) SEC-MALS analysis of the ligated
antibody showing that it retains its tetrameric structure after thiolysis
and ligation (Mw = 151 kDa, Mw calcd = 148 kDa). (E) ESI-TOF MS analysis of degycosylated
and fully reduced HC after ligation, showing 75% of the HC is labeled.
Expected mass for ligation product = 50221.2 Da. Free HC = 49575.0
Da.
Figure 7
Binding of αDEC205-CGK(Fl) to the DEC205 receptor.
(A) Dose
dependent binding of αDEC205-CGK(Fl) to CHO cells expressing
the mouse DEC205 receptor monitored by flow cytometry using a PE-labeled
α-mouse IgG. Binding to control CHO/NEO cells, which do not
express the receptor is shown in gray. (B) As in (A) but using a control
α-DEC205 antibody.
Purification
of a monoclonal antibody α-thioester using a
split intein and its site-specific modification. (A) Test expression
of αDEC205 genetically fused to the contiguous Mxe GyrA intein
and different split DnaE inteins through the C-terminus of its heavy
chain (HC). Western blot of 293T cell supernatants of several αDEC205-Int
fusions using an antibody against mouseIgG. A loading control is
shown below. (B) Purification of αDEC205-MES thioester using
the split intein column. (C) Elution fractions containing αDEC205-MES
were concentrated to 20 μM and ligated to the CGK(Fl) fluorescent
peptide at 1 mM for 48 h at rt. (D) SEC-MALS analysis of the ligated
antibody showing that it retains its tetrameric structure after thiolysis
and ligation (Mw = 151 kDa, Mw calcd = 148 kDa). (E) ESI-TOF MS analysis of degycosylated
and fully reduced HC after ligation, showing 75% of the HC is labeled.
Expected mass for ligation product = 50221.2 Da. Free HC = 49575.0
Da.Binding of αDEC205-CGK(Fl) to the DEC205 receptor.
(A) Dose
dependent binding of αDEC205-CGK(Fl) to CHO cells expressing
the mouseDEC205 receptor monitored by flow cytometry using a PE-labeled
α-mouseIgG. Binding to control CHO/NEO cells, which do not
express the receptor is shown in gray. (B) As in (A) but using a control
α-DEC205 antibody.
Conclusion
We have shown that split DnaE inteins can
be engineered for the
efficient generation and isolation of protein α-thioesters.
Furthermore, the strategy can be seamlessly integrated with EPL, and
one pot purification/ligations can be performed without isolation
of the α-thioester intermediates. We note, however, that the
ligation step (i.e., NCL) still requires the use of high concentrations
(high μM or above) of N-terminal cysteinepeptide for efficient
reactions. The strong and specific interaction between the two intein
fragments facilitates the purification of protein α-thioesters
under a variety of conditions, including strong denaturants, and the
isolation of these products directly from cell lysates proceeds significantly
faster than via many mainstream EPL strategies, which often take multiple
days and several intermediate enrichment/purification steps. Additionally,
while split intein fusions are usually associated with low levels
of expression, we show here that certain DnaE IntN fragments
express to the same levels as commonly used contiguous inteins when
fused to a monoclonal Ab. Moreover, the absence of premature cleavage
events allowed us to generate semisynthetic proteins, such as H2B-K120Ac
in far superior yields than those of previously established protocols.
Importantly, we have shown the utility of this methodology for the
modification of complex biomolecules such as an IgG. Thus, streamlined
EPL via our split DnaE intein column should provide an efficient route
to site-specifically modified proteins for basic biochemical research
as well as translational applications.
Experimental Section
Preparation of IntC Column
NpuC-AA-Cys-OMepeptide (0.5 μmols per mL of resin) was dissolved
in 2 column volumes (CV) of coupling buffer (50 mM Tris·HCl at
pH 8.5, 250 μL for 125 μL resin) and treated with 25 mM
TCEP from a 1 M stock for 15 min. The peptide solution was then added
to 1 CV of agarose SulfoLink resin (from Pierce, loading: 18.4 μmol
iodoacetyl groups/mL of resin) in a small fritted column and incubated
for 15 min on a nutator, followed by 30 min standing at rt. The column
flow-through was collected, and the column was washed twice with 2
CV of coupling buffer. Unreacted iodoacetyl groups on the resin were
blocked by a treatment with 50 mM H-Cys-OMe in coupling buffer for
15 min on a nutator, followed by 30 min standing at rt. Column was
washed twice with 1 CV of coupling buffer, 2 CV of 1 M NaCl, and finally
2 CV of water. IntC columns were stored in storage buffer
(100 mM phosphate, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.05% NaN3,
pH 7.2), at 4 °C for up to 2 weeks.
Purification of POI-MES α-Thioesters from Cell Lysates
Soluble Fraction
BL21(DE3)
cells transformed with the desired POI-NpuN plasmid were
grown in 1 L of LB containing 100 μg/mL of ampicillin at 37
°C until OD600 = 0.6. Protein expression was induced
by addition of 0.5 mM IPTG. After harvesting the cells by centrifugation
(10 500 rcf, 30 min), the cell pellets were transferred to
50 mL conical tubes with 20 mL of high-salt binding buffer (100 mM
phosphate, 500 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM TCEP, pH 7.2) with complete
protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche) and stored at −80 °C.
Resuspended cells were lysed by sonication, and the soluble fraction
recovered by centrifugation (17 000 rcf, 10 min). Onto 62.5
μL of IntC column, 300 μL of the soluble fraction
were loaded and incubated at rt for 5 min. After incubation, the flow-through
was collected, and the column was washed with 300 μL of high-salt
binding buffer, 300 μL of wash buffer (100 mM phosphate, 300
mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM TCEP, pH 7.2), and 300 μL of binding
buffer (100 mM phosphate, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM TCEP, pH 7.2).
The column was capped and incubated with 150 μL of elution buffer
(100 mM phosphate, 150 mM NaCl, 200 mM MES, 10 mM TCEP, 1 mM EDTA,
pH 7.2) for 18 h. Flow-through was collected, and the column was washed
three times with 150 μL elution buffer.
One-Pot EPL using IntC Column
Onto 62.5
μL of IntC column, 300 μL cell lysate containing
Ub-NpuN was loaded and incubated as described before. After
incubation, the column flow-through was collected. The column was
washed with 300 μL high-salt binding buffer, 300 μL wash
buffer, and 300 μL binding buffer. The column was capped and
incubated with 75 μL EPL buffer (100 mM phosphate, 150 mM NaCl,
200 mM MES, 50 mM MPAA, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM TCEP, pH 7.9) containing
1 mM CGK(Fl) peptide for 18 h. The flow-through was collected, and
the column was washed three times with 75 μL elution buffer.
All fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Gels were first imaged using
the green fluorescence channel on a GE ImageQuant LAS 4010 imager
and then coomassie stained.
Preparation of αDEC205-CGK(Fl) via Streamlined EPL Using
the IntC Column
HEK293T cells were transiently
cotransfected with antimouse-DEC205-LC and antimouse-DEC205-HC-AvaN using lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen), according to the manufacturer’s
instructions. Typical cotransfections were performed in 10 cm plates.
After 4 days incubation at 37 °C with 5% CO2, cell
supernatants were harvested and spun down at 2000 rcf for 20 min at
4 °C, filtered through a 0.22 μm filter, and supplemented
with complete protease inhbitors. For a typical purification, 50 mL
of αDEC205-AvaN transfected cell supernatants were
concentrated to a final volume of 5 mL and exchanged into binding
buffer. The resulting Ab solution (input) was applied to an IntC column of 300 μL beads (loading: 1.8 μmol NpuCpeptide/mL) and incubated at rt for 30 min. Column flow-through was
collected, and column washed three times with 3 CV of wash buffer
and once with 3 CV of binding buffer. The column was capped and incubated
with 3 CV of Ab elution buffer (100 mM phosphate, 150 mM NaCl, 200
mM MES, 1 mM TCEP, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.2) for 20 h. The column flow-through
was collected, and the column washed three times with 3 CV of Ab elution
buffer. Elutions containing αDEC205-MES were combined and concentrated
down to 20 μM. Ligation was initiated by addition of 1 mM CGK(Fl)
peptide and 1 mM TCEP and adjusting pH to 7.5–8.0. The reaction
was incubated in the dark at rt for 48 h and monitored by SDS-PAGE
imaged using a fluorescence scanner and coomassie staining. Once the
reaction was completed, the ligated Ab was diluted to 200–500
μL and dialyzed into 100 mM phosphate, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA,
1 mM TCEP, pH 7.2.
Authors: S Chong; F B Mersha; D G Comb; M E Scott; D Landry; L M Vence; F B Perler; J Benner; R B Kucera; C A Hirvonen; J J Pelletier; H Paulus; M Q Xu Journal: Gene Date: 1997-06-19 Impact factor: 3.688
Authors: Gil Amitai; Brian P Callahan; Matt J Stanger; Georges Belfort; Marlene Belfort Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-06-17 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Scott Barbuto; Juliana Idoyaga; Miquel Vila-Perelló; Maria P Longhi; Gaëlle Breton; Ralph M Steinman; Tom W Muir Journal: Nat Chem Biol Date: 2013-02-17 Impact factor: 15.040
Authors: Zhihua Liu; Silvia Frutos; Matthew J Bick; Miquel Vila-Perelló; Galia T Debelouchina; Seth A Darst; Tom W Muir Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-04-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Martin D Witte; Christopher S Theile; Tongfei Wu; Carla P Guimaraes; Annet E M Blom; Hidde L Ploegh Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2013-08-29 Impact factor: 13.491