Literature DB >> 23254459

Effective removal of co-purified inhibitors from extracted DNA samples using synchronous coefficient of drag alteration (SCODA) technology.

Sarah Schmedes1, Pamela Marshall, Jonathan L King, Bruce Budowle.   

Abstract

Various types of biological samples present challenges for extraction of DNA suitable for subsequent molecular analyses. Commonly used extraction methods, such as silica membrane columns and phenol-chloroform, while highly successful may still fail to provide a sufficiently pure DNA extract with some samples. Synchronous coefficient of drag alteration (SCODA), implemented in Boreal Genomics' Aurora Nucleic Acid Extraction System (Boreal Genomics, Vancouver, BC), is a new technology that offers the potential to remove inhibitors effectively while simultaneously concentrating DNA. In this initial study, SCODA was tested for its ability to remove various concentrations of forensically and medically relevant polymerase chain reaction (PCR) inhibitors naturally found in tissue, hair, blood, plant, and soil samples. SCODA was used to purify and concentrate DNA from intentionally contaminated DNA samples containing known concentrations of hematin, humic acid, melanin, and tannic acid. The internal positive control (IPC) provided in the Quantifiler™ Human DNA Quantification Kit (Life Technologies, Foster City, CA) and short tandem repeat (STR) profiling (AmpFℓSTR® Identifiler® Plus PCR Amplification Kit; Life Technologies, Foster City, CA) were used to measure inhibition effects and hence purification. SCODA methodology yielded overall higher efficiency of purification of highly contaminated samples compared with the QIAquick® PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). SCODA-purified DNA yielded no cycle shift of the IPC for each sample and yielded greater allele percentage recovery and relative fluorescence unit values compared with the QIAquick® purification method. The Aurora provided an automated, minimal-step approach to successfully remove inhibitors and concentrate DNA from challenged samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23254459     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-012-0810-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  26 in total

1.  Extraction platform evaluations: a comparison of AutoMate Express™, EZ1® Advanced XL, and Maxwell® 16 Bench-top DNA extraction systems.

Authors:  Carey P Davis; Jonathan L King; Bruce Budowle; Arthur J Eisenberg; Meredith A Turnbough
Journal:  Leg Med (Tokyo)       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 1.376

2.  Simple and highly effective DNA extraction methods from old skeletal remains using silica columns.

Authors:  Hwan Young Lee; Myung Jin Park; Na Young Kim; Jeong Eun Sim; Woo Ick Yang; Kyoung-Jin Shin
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 4.882

3.  Integrated DNA and fingerprint analyses in the identification of 60-year-old mummified human remains discovered in an Alaskan glacier.

Authors:  Odile M Loreille; Ryan L Parr; Kevin A McGregor; Colleen M Fitzpatrick; Chriss Lyon; Dongya Y Yang; Camilla F Speller; Michael R Grimm; Michael J Grimm; Jodi A Irwin; Edward M Robinson
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 1.832

4.  Effect of DNA structure on the formation of collagen-DNA complex.

Authors:  Michiko Kaya; Yoshiharu Toyama; Kenji Kubota; Yoshinobu Nodasaka; Masanori Ochiai; Motoyoshi Nomizu; Norio Nishi
Journal:  Int J Biol Macromol       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 6.953

5.  Collagen-DNA complex.

Authors:  David V Svintradze; George M Mrevlishvili; Nunu Metreveli; Ketevan Jariashvili; Luisa Namicheishvili; Joana Skopinska; Alina Sionkowska
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 6.988

6.  A comparison of the effects of PCR inhibition in quantitative PCR and forensic STR analysis.

Authors:  Maribel E Funes-Huacca; Kerry Opel; Robyn Thompson; Bruce R McCord
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 7.  Forensic implications of PCR inhibition--A review.

Authors:  Reza Alaeddini
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 4.882

8.  Development of internal amplification controls for DNA profiling with the AmpFℓSTR(®) SGM Plus(®) kit.

Authors:  Nathalie Zahra; Sibte Hadi; Judith A Smith; Arati Iyengar; William Goodwin
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.535

9.  Melanin binds reversibly to thermostable DNA polymerase and inhibits its activity.

Authors:  L Eckhart; J Bach; J Ban; E Tschachler
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2000-05-19       Impact factor: 3.575

10.  Developmental validation of the quantifiler real-time PCR kits for the quantification of human nuclear DNA samples.

Authors:  Robert L Green; Ines C Roinestad; Cherisse Boland; Lori K Hennessy
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.832

View more
  4 in total

1.  Permanganate-assisted removal of PCR inhibitors during the DNA Chelex extraction from stained denim samples.

Authors:  Sorina Pîrlea; Mihaela Puiu; Adina Răducan; Dumitru Oancea
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Assessment of impact of DNA extraction methods on analysis of human remain samples on massively parallel sequencing success.

Authors:  Xiangpei Zeng; Kyleen Elwick; Carrie Mayes; Maiko Takahashi; Jonathan L King; David Gangitano; Bruce Budowle; Sheree Hughes-Stamm
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Competitive allele-specific TaqMan PCR (Cast-PCR) is a sensitive, specific and fast method for BRAF V600 mutation detection in Melanoma patients.

Authors:  Raffaela Barbano; Barbara Pasculli; Michelina Coco; Andrea Fontana; Massimiliano Copetti; Michelina Rendina; Vanna Maria Valori; Paolo Graziano; Evaristo Maiello; Vito Michele Fazio; Paola Parrella
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  PCR inhibition in qPCR, dPCR and MPS-mechanisms and solutions.

Authors:  Maja Sidstedt; Peter Rådström; Johannes Hedman
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 4.142

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.