Literature DB >> 21917539

Forensic implications of PCR inhibition--A review.

Reza Alaeddini1.   

Abstract

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is currently the method of choice for the identification of human remains in forensic coursework. DNA samples from crime scenes often contain co-purified impurities which inhibit PCR. PCR inhibition is the most common cause of PCR failure when adequate copies of DNA are present. Inhibitors have been routinely reported in forensic investigations of DNA extracted from a variety of templates. Humic compounds, a series of substances produced during decay process have been considered as the materials contaminating DNA in soil, natural waters and recent sediments. Those compounds have been frequently assigned as PCR inhibitors. The current report reviews the characteristics of PCR inhibition, including the proposed mechanisms of inhibition, detection methods and the available technologies to remove or overcome the inhibitory activities. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21917539     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet        ISSN: 1872-4973            Impact factor:   4.882


  35 in total

1.  Comparative study of seven commercial kits for human DNA extraction from urine samples suitable for DNA biomarker-based public health studies.

Authors:  Latifa El Bali; Aurélie Diman; Alfred Bernard; Nancy H C Roosens; Sigrid C J De Keersmaecker
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2014-12

2.  Methodological Guidelines for Accurate Detection of Viruses in Wild Plant Species.

Authors:  Christelle Lacroix; Kurra Renner; Ellen Cole; Eric W Seabloom; Elizabeth T Borer; Carolyn M Malmstrom
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  A validation study of the Nucleix DSI-Semen kit--a methylation-based assay for semen identification.

Authors:  Bobby L LaRue; Jonathan L King; Bruce Budowle
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  Developmental validation of the STRscan-17LC kit: a 6 Dye STR kit enhanced stability and ability to detect degraded samples.

Authors:  Bowei Jiang; Wei He; Chuan Jin; Ying Liu; Dan Wen; Chudong Wang; Moutanou Modeste Judes Zeye; Jienan Li; Lagabaiyila Zha
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  As solid as a rock-comparison of CE- and MPS-based analyses of the petrosal bone as a source of DNA for forensic identification of challenging cranial bones.

Authors:  Galina Kulstein; Thorsten Hadrys; Peter Wiegand
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 2.686

6.  A method for extracting DNA from hard tissues for use in forensic identification.

Authors:  Jarunya Samsuwan; Thanutham Somboonchokepisal; Thunyathorn Akaraputtiporn; Tunwarut Srimuang; Phuris Phuengsukdaeng; Aunchulee Suwannarat; Apiwat Mutirangura; Nakarin Kitkumthorn
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2018-09-13

7.  Pressure cycling technology (PCT) reduces effects of inhibitors of the PCR.

Authors:  Pamela L Marshall; Jonathan L King; Nathan P Lawrence; Alexander Lazarev; Vera S Gross; Bruce Budowle
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 2.686

8.  Effective removal of co-purified inhibitors from extracted DNA samples using synchronous coefficient of drag alteration (SCODA) technology.

Authors:  Sarah Schmedes; Pamela Marshall; Jonathan L King; Bruce Budowle
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 9.  Microbial Degradation of Forensic Samples of Biological Origin: Potential Threat to Human DNA Typing.

Authors:  Hirak Ranjan Dash; Surajit Das
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.695

10.  A role for iron and oxygen chemistry in preserving soft tissues, cells and molecules from deep time.

Authors:  Mary H Schweitzer; Wenxia Zheng; Timothy P Cleland; Mark B Goodwin; Elizabeth Boatman; Elizabeth Theil; Matthew A Marcus; Sirine C Fakra
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.