Literature DB >> 21462225

A comparison of the effects of PCR inhibition in quantitative PCR and forensic STR analysis.

Maribel E Funes-Huacca1, Kerry Opel, Robyn Thompson, Bruce R McCord.   

Abstract

In this paper we compare the effects of three representative PCR inhibitors using quantitative PCR (qPCR) and multiplex STR amplification in order to determine the effect of inhibitor concentration on allele dropout and to develop better ways to interpret forensic DNA data. We have used humic acid, collagen and calcium phosphate at different concentrations to evaluate the profiles of alleles inhibited in these amplifications. These data were correlated with previously obtained results from quantitative PCR including melt curve effects, efficiency changes and cycle threshold (Ct) values. Overall, the data show that there are two competing processes that result from PCR inhibition. The first process is a general loss of larger alleles. This appears to occur with all inhibitors. The second process is more sequence specific and occurs when the inhibitor binds DNA, altering the cycle threshold and the melt curve. This sequence-specific inhibition results in patterns of allele loss that occur in addition to the overall loss of larger alleles. The data demonstrate the applicability of utilizing real-time PCR results to predict the presence of certain types of PCR inhibition in STR analysis.
Copyright © 2011 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21462225     DOI: 10.1002/elps.201000584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electrophoresis        ISSN: 0173-0835            Impact factor:   3.535


  9 in total

1.  Towards developing forensically relevant single-cell pipelines by incorporating direct-to-PCR extraction: compatibility, signal quality, and allele detection.

Authors:  Nidhi Sheth; Harish Swaminathan; Amanda J Gonzalez; Ken R Duffy; Catherine M Grgicak
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  A preliminary assessment of the ForenSeq™ FGx System: next generation sequencing of an STR and SNP multiplex.

Authors:  Ashley L Silvia; Nathan Shugarts; Jenifer Smith
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Pressure cycling technology (PCT) reduces effects of inhibitors of the PCR.

Authors:  Pamela L Marshall; Jonathan L King; Nathan P Lawrence; Alexander Lazarev; Vera S Gross; Bruce Budowle
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  Effective removal of co-purified inhibitors from extracted DNA samples using synchronous coefficient of drag alteration (SCODA) technology.

Authors:  Sarah Schmedes; Pamela Marshall; Jonathan L King; Bruce Budowle
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Characterization of degradation and heterozygote balance by simulation of the forensic DNA analysis process.

Authors:  Oskar Hansson; Thore Egeland; Peter Gill
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 6.  In pursuit of sensitivity: Lessons learned from viral nucleic acid detection and quantification on the Raindance ddPCR platform.

Authors:  Samuel Long
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 4.647

7.  Separation of Mycobacterium abscessus into subspecies or genotype level by direct application of peptide nucleic acid multi-probe- real-time PCR method into sputa samples.

Authors:  Kijeong Kim; Seok-Hyun Hong; Byoung-Jun Kim; Bo-Ram Kim; So-Young Lee; Ga-Na Kim; Tae Sun Shim; Yoon-Hoh Kook; Bum-Joon Kim
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 8.  Current Technologies and Recent Developments for Screening of HPV-Associated Cervical and Oropharyngeal Cancers.

Authors:  Sunny S Shah; Satyajyoti Senapati; Flora Klacsmann; Daniel L Miller; Jeff J Johnson; Hsueh-Chia Chang; M Sharon Stack
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Subduing the influence of PCR inhibitors on amplifying aged, degraded, and low copy number DNA: PCR enhancer cocktail-p and rescue PCR.

Authors:  Brian M Kemp; Brittany Bingham; Ryan Frome; Marie Labonte; Erica Palmer; Ella S Parsons; Kenneth W Gobalet; Jeffrey Rosenthal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.