Literature DB >> 23254319

Increasing lead burden correlates with externalized cables during systematic fluoroscopic screening of Riata leads.

Liza P Moorman1, J Randall Moorman, John P DiMarco, Rohit Malhotra, Andrew Darby, Kenneth Bilchick, John D Ferguson, J Michael Mangrum, Sandeep Kamath, Pamela K Mason.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Riata and Riata ST defibrillator leads (St. Jude Medical, Sylmar, CA, USA) have been recalled due to increased risk of insulation failure leading to externalized cables. As this mechanical failure does not necessarily correlate with electrical failure, it can be difficult to diagnose. Fluoroscopic screening can identify insulation failure. Studies have suggested that insulation failure is predominantly seen in 8-Fr, single-coil models. Our patients have exclusively dual-coil leads and a high proportion of 7-Fr leads.
METHODS: Fluoroscopic screening was performed in 48 patients with recalled Riata leads. Twenty-three patients had 8-Fr Riata leads and 25 patients had 7-Fr Riata ST leads. Images were recorded in at least three projections and studies were reviewed by seven attending electrophysiologists.
RESULTS: Externalized cables were seen in ten patients (21 %), and another five patients (10 %) had abnormal cable spacing. All device interrogations showed normal parameters. Patients with abnormal leads had more leads in situ (2.5 ± 0.7 vs. 1.6 ± 0.8 leads; P = 0.002) and a higher rate of nonischemic cardiomyopathy (80 vs. 24 %; P = 0.03). There were no differences between the groups with regards to patient age, body mass index, lead age, lead parameters, or vascular access site. There was no difference with regard to lead size (P = 0.76).
CONCLUSIONS: The Riata family of leads has a high incidence of mechanical failure, as demonstrated on fluoroscopic screening. In this study, the 7-Fr models were just as likely to mechanically fail as the 8-Fr models. Increasing lead burden and a diagnosis of nonischemic cardiomyopathy correlated with insulation failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23254319      PMCID: PMC3932032          DOI: 10.1007/s10840-012-9760-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  14 in total

1.  Complications associated with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator replacement in response to device advisories.

Authors:  Paul A Gould; Andrew D Krahn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-04-26       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Unrecognized failure of a narrow caliber defibrillation lead: the role of defibrillation threshold testing in identifying an unprotected individual.

Authors:  Darryl P Leong; Lieselot van Erven
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 1.976

3.  Clinical predictors of Fidelis lead failure: report from the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Device Committee.

Authors:  David H Birnie; Ratika Parkash; Derek V Exner; Vidal Essebag; Jeffrey S Healey; Atul Verma; Benoit Coutu; Teresa Kus; Iqwal Mangat; Felix Ayala-Paredes; Pablo Nery; George Wells; Andrew D Krahn
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead disintegration at the level of the tricuspid valve.

Authors:  Gabor Z Duray; Carsten W Israel; Jörn Schmitt; Stefan H Hohnloser
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 5.  Premature failure of a Riata defibrillator lead without impedance change or inappropriate sensing: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Angela Krebsbach; Fawaz Alhumaid; Charles A Henrikson; Hugh Calkins; Ronald D Berger; Alan Cheng
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-03-08

6.  Unusual failure of a multilumen, small-diameter implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead.

Authors:  Zaccaria Jalal; Nicolas Derval; Sylvain Ploux; Pierre Bordachar
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 6.343

7.  Riata implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead failure: analysis of explanted leads with a unique insulation defect.

Authors:  Robert G Hauser; Deepa McGriff; Linda Kallinen Retel
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 6.343

8.  Risks of spontaneous injury and extraction of an active fixation pacemaker lead: report of the Accufix Multicenter Clinical Study and Worldwide Registry.

Authors:  G N Kay; J A Brinker; D T Kawanishi; C J Love; M A Lloyd; R C Reeves; G Pioger; J A Fee; M K Overland; L G Ensign; G L Grunkemeier
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-12-07       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Insulation defects of thin high-voltage ICD leads: an underestimated problem?

Authors:  Damir Erkapic; Gabor Z Duray; Tamas Bauernfeind; Salvatore De Rosa; Stefan H Hohnloser
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-04-01

10.  Prevalence of asymptomatic and electrically undetectable intracardiac inside-out abrasion in silicon-coated Riata® and Riata® ST implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads.

Authors:  Mathieu Schmutz; Etienne Delacrétaz; Nicola Schwick; Laurent Roten; Jürg Fuhrer; Claudia Boesch; Hildegard Tanner
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 4.164

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cost of a recall of a single-center experience managing the Riata defibrillator lead.

Authors:  Sarah Hussain; Liza Moorman; J Randall Moorman; John P DiMarco; Rohit Malhotra; Andrew Darby; Kenneth Bilchick; J Michael Mangrum; John D Ferguson; Pamela K Mason
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 2.778

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.